The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

http://sports.ign.com/madden06/redskins.html

There's a lot in here you will like. But there's also some you won't like.

Discuss.

Skinz
http://sports.ign.com/madden06/redskins.html

Boyz
http://sports.ign.com/madden06/cowboys.html

Birds
http://sports.ign.com/madden06/eagles.html

G-Men
http://sports.ign.com/madden06/giants.html

Our defense got burnt on the ratings this year.

Not really. C.Griffin and Springs did So did Evans and Salavea, but there not big names yet, and that's what madden does if your not a house-hold name.

But I can live with this:

P. Daniels 83
B.Noble 78
C.Griffin 88
R.Wynn 81

Arrington 95
Washington 92
Holdman 86
Barrow 85
Marshall 80

Springs 87
Rogers 80
Harris 81

Taylor 91
Bowen 83

I can play with a defense, that only has one starter under 80.

P.S

ey should be about an 82, and Portis should not have taken a hit.

The only player they really underrated was Springs.
Madden was real generous with Santana's ratings

Also... wheres Manuel White!!!

Do you guys remember in Madden 05 Coles' speed was 99.

Why was his speed rated so high? Not that he is slow but he is not the fastest guy in the NFL.

I am angry with Springs rating, at the end of last season with the updated rosters, Springs was an 89. So why did he fall to 87? Dont get me started on why Portis' overall fell?

how can mccune strength rating be so low? that's stupid. a 72, he should be like a 1000

vife wrote:how can mccune strength rating be so low? that's stupid. a 72, he should be like a 1000

Actually, I think a 72 is generous. He is a 5th round rookie who has yet to do ANYTHING on the field. I mean, I know he's a great story and I root for him too, but at least he is in the game, Manny Wright was picked before him (4th round) and isn't even listed.

Taylor a 91 in his second year? Something tells me that he's a solid pick for franchise mode--he'd probably get up to 99 within 2 years!

In my opinion (I don't want to start any fights, though), Madden has always over-rated Lavar. But I'm glad to see Washington (finally) getting some recognition in the ratings. Can anyone tell me what he was as of the final update in last year's game?


It looks like Moss will be a beast according to Madden's ratings. I love having a receiver with near maximum speed in that game.


Also, Salavea got cut a little short, I think. A 71 is not good enough to be a role-player in that game, which (in real life) Salavea does very well.


It looks like it'll be another good year in terms of how fun it is to be the Skins on Madden. Usually all I really want is a decent O-line, a good back, and a good secondary. It was tough to play the game a couple of years ago with Trung at the helm and an under-rated O-line.

But do you know what mccune benches and stuff?! he's mad strong

FanfromAnnapolis wrote:Taylor a 91 in his second year? Something tells me that he's a solid pick for franchise mode--he'd probably get up to 99 within 2 years!

In my opinion (I don't want to start any fights, though), Madden has always over-rated Lavar. But I'm glad to see Washington (finally) getting some recognition in the ratings. Can anyone tell me what he was as of the final update in last year's game?


It looks like Moss will be a beast according to Madden's ratings. I love having a receiver with near maximum speed in that game.


Also, Salavea got cut a little short, I think. A 71 is not good enough to be a role-player in that game, which (in real life) Salavea does very well.


It looks like it'll be another good year in terms of how fun it is to be the Skins on Madden. Usually all I really want is a decent O-line, a good back, and a good secondary. It was tough to play the game a couple of years ago with Trung at the helm and an under-rated O-line.

LaVar was 98 in the last roster update of Madden 2005

ejay183 wrote:LaVar was 98 in the last roster update of Madden 2005

Right, but what about Marcus Washington?

Here's Ramsey's "Vision Cone"




Here's Boonell's




How in the heck can Brunell have a bigger cone than Ramsey!?!?!


And by the way, here's Peyton's...

I agree with Brunells cone being bigger than Ramseys although I think Ramseys cone is still a bit small.

Brunells isn't retarded, he's just physically deficient. His cone should be that size but the ball should never go past 10 yards.

Ramsey is going to take some serious work. However, since the PS2 and PSP versions are compatible, I can save my game to my PSP and play it at work!!!

Peyton...I have nothing to say.

jeez.... this is gonna be hard...I only play with the SKINS.

LMFAO OMG LOOK AT PEYTONS... His awareness must be crazy

Punu wrote:jeez.... this is gonna be hard...I only play with the SKINS.

Well you do have the option to turn it off. I used the Skins in a madden tourney I played in last year. I came in 2nd . However if Ramseys cone is going to be that small I may just pick a team with a killer QB and save myself the headache.

We have yet to play it so it may be a good thing. I plan on using the cone as a decoy anyway. Just like in real life, a QB cannot stare down a WR.

I wish we could all get together and play for real... does anyone live near mason?

Punu wrote:I wish we could all get together and play for real... does anyone live near mason?

People could always play online.

Naw i mean for real real... in person

http://www.maddenguides.com/teams/Washington.htm

go there and read the number of plays and such that they have they broke it down into percentages of run/pass plays and all that jazz--kind of odd that we have 42 shotgun plays and we have a 2 to 1 pass/run ratio?!?! that just strikes me as odd