Page 1 of 1
Replay Specialist, Redskins Part Ways
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:10 pm
by 1niksder
Replay Specialist, Redskins Part Ways
By Nunyo Demasio
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 5, 2005; Page E02
Washington Redskins Coach Joe Gibbs recently decided against retaining Larry Hill, who was hired before last season as a full-time replay official, according to two sources with knowledge of the development. Hill's one-year contract expired last month.
The addition of Hill -- a former referee considered among the best in his profession -- initially was viewed as a typically innovative move by Gibbs: The Redskins were the sole NFL organization with a consultant whose main job was to attend every game and advise the head coach on replay challenges. Nonetheless, the Redskins lost most of their replay challenges, leading to clock mismanagement in certain games. (At one point, after a Nov. 21 loss to the Philadelphia Eagles, the Redskins lost five of their first six challenges.)
However, according to one offensive assistant, the setup was flawed because Hill frequently was overruled when he recommended against a challenge. Gibbs publicly conceded unilaterally issuing a few replay challenges that were lost, but never disclosed a breakdown of Hill's decisions.
The Redskins are expected to use a traditional setup, with assistants having heavy input before Gibbs makes a final decision. Gibbs largely hired Hill -- who sat in the coaches' booth watching television feeds -- to avoid assistants becoming emotionally attached to plays.
Gibbs, who is on vacation, as is his staff, until July 25, was unavailable to comment. Hill couldn't be reached to comment.
According to a league source, new Miami Dolphins coach Nick Saban intends to hire a replay official with similar duties to Hill's. But Saban -- who has contacted the NFL for a pool of retired officials -- is seeking someone with an increased workload.
Hill's other duties included overseeing referees to work practices; monitoring penalty tendencies of players and meeting with Gibbs's staff to deconstruct calls. Because no other team had hired a former referee in such a capacity -- Hill was an NFL referee the previous five years, including the 2004 Super Bowl -- the Redskins received permission from the league office.
While Gibbs was on an 11-year hiatus before returning in 2004, the NFL underwent several changes, including replay challenges. Although the league had an instant replay system during Gibbs's first tenure, coaches weren't allowed to challenge calls. Now, coaches get two replay challenges per game. When ruled correct in challenging, the play is reversed. (Also, if the coach wins both times, he earns a third challenge.) But unsuccessful challenges result in a lost timeout.
Note: FedEx Field on July 28 will host a soccer game between D.C. United and Chelsea of the English Premier League. The game is scheduled to start at 8 p.m.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01003.html
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:04 am
by redskins12287
I remember being so confused on most of those challeneges. I just could not understand how Gibbs could challenge some of those calls that were so obvious that he should not challenge them.
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:31 am
by air_hog
Thank God, that guy was my least favorite person in the organization.
It seemed as if at some times during the year, he was playing for the other team by have Gibbs call the dumbest challenges.
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:58 am
by skins2win
However, according to one offensive assistant, the setup was flawed because Hill frequently was overruled when he recommended against a challenge. Gibbs publicly conceded unilaterally issuing a few replay challenges that were lost, but never disclosed a breakdown of Hill's decisions.
It was almost comical at times last season. I think that it was said that Hill rarely got a good look at the play before the call had to be made.
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:51 am
by washington53
that guy did some bad decisions lets hope we can get someone good out there to win us some challenges
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:40 pm
by Redskin in Canada
The calls should be made by head coach with the assistance of assistants on the field. There is hardly any time to allow anybody else to make a call from a booth. To be fair to Hill, it is very difficult to tell whether some of the worse challenges were called by him or by Gibbs under the advice of any other coach. Obviously Gibbs was not thrilled with the experiment.

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:50 pm
by BernieSki
That is good news. This guys was wrong more times then he was right, from what I remember.
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:50 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
Redskin in Canada wrote:The calls should be made by head coach with the assistance of assistants on the field. There is hardly any time to allow anybody else to make a call from a booth. To be fair to Hill, it is very difficult to tell whether some of the worse challenges were called by him or by Gibbs under the advice of any other coach. Obviously Gibbs was not thrilled with the experiment.

"there is hardly any time to to allow anybody else to make a call" ? I made them fine from my living room watching Fox reply. I can't understand, with today's technology and communication capability, how they screwed up so many obvious calls. Give Gibbs a cell phone and I'll call them in from my living room.....for free!!

Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:06 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
1fan4ramsey wrote:Redskin in Canada wrote:The calls should be made by head coach with the assistance of assistants on the field. There is hardly any time to allow anybody else to make a call from a booth. To be fair to Hill, it is very difficult to tell whether some of the worse challenges were called by him or by Gibbs under the advice of any other coach. Obviously Gibbs was not thrilled with the experiment.

"there is hardly any time to to allow anybody else to make a call" ? I made them fine from my living room watching Fox reply. I can't understand, with today's technology and communication capability, how they screwed up so many obvious calls. Give Gibbs a cell phone and I'll call them in from my living room.....for free!!


Some of those calls were disgustingly retarded.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:29 am
by gay4pacman
We were the worst replay/challenge team in the league. We need to get that aspect of our team pulled together.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:40 am
by hatsOFF2gibbs
Nice! Now we can actually have someone reliable to do the job. I heard JGibbs' grandbaby is applying!
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:38 am
by John Manfreda
good he sucked
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:47 am
by Deadskins
An ex-ref is not a person you want to consult on replays. They are wrong half the time anyway. I usually see the need for a replay during the live action. I wonder if he was watching the game on TV anyway. Standing on the sideline is also a very difficult perspective to judge that, so Gibbs shouldn't override the replay guy unless he sees the play directly in front of him.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:12 pm
by Redskin in Canada
JSPB22 wrote: They are wrong half the time anyway.
That is why we should have only paid attention to him half the time! Only problem is... What half?
I am sure they will have a better system in place this year.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 1:09 pm
by MarcusBeNimble
i nearly lost my mind several times last year when challenges were being issued. Larry Hill pretty much failed his job for the team. wether or not Gibbs used some of his own opinion to make decisions, i bet you Hill screwed up several on his own.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 1:09 pm
by MarcusBeNimble
i nearly lost my mind several times last year when challenges were being issued. Larry Hill pretty much failed his job for the team. wether or not Gibbs used some of his own opinion to make decisions, i bet you Hill screwed up several on his own.