The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 7:16 pm**

I think we should get him great locker room presence and solid pass rusher fits gibbs personality if he dosnt ask for much we should grab him

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 7:20 pm**

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....how many linebackers do we need and this guy is expensive...whats wrong with our linebackers rihht now?

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 7:54 pm**

Plus, we just got Holdman. Enough is enough...we have too many LBs already. I've lost count.....8-9-10???

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 8:44 pm**

Hey! The guy IS a free agent and has a recognizable name. Of course we need him.

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 8:55 pm**

riggofan, just because he is a recognizable naem does not mean we need him. Your thinking like DannyBoy " Aha ive heard his name many times lets sign him" we have way more than enough LBS. We do not need this guy. What we need is a DE, and thats it. no more LBS, other wise weel be switching to 2-6 defense which doesnt exist.

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:07 pm**

I say okay if we can use him at DE. I think we have enough LB's, but I am not sold with our DE's

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:20 pm**

washington53 wrote: no more LBS, other wise weel be switching to 2-6 defense which doesnt exist.

Well we could always be the first :wink:

Really though...we are getting a little full at LB, but if he can make the switch to DE and be successful...why not? If GW thinks he can, I have faith in him.

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:22 pm**

If GW thinks a rooster can lay an egg i have faith in him.

And yeah Hogfather we can always be the first

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:42 pm**

washington53 wrote:If GW thinks a rooster can lay an egg i have faith in him.

I don't have that much faith in GW, but if he asked me to run through a wall...I would

and just for the record, I was kidding about the 2-6 defense. I just wanted to make that clear, just in case you might have thought differently.

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:44 pm**

the raiders will sign him just because he's old and he has a big name

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 9:55 pm**

washington53 wrote:riggofan, just because he is a recognizable naem does not mean we need him. Your thinking like DannyBoy " Aha ive heard his name many times lets sign him" we have way more than enough LBS. We do not need this guy. What we need is a DE, and thats it. no more LBS, other wise weel be switching to 2-6 defense which doesnt exist.

2-6?!?!?!?!?! Thats freakin great!!!

Seriously, I agree that we have too many linebackers right now. Lets let Barrow, Marshall........ok I'm saying it because he's huge.....McCune compete for the starting spot.

Honestly, if Barrow is healthy he'll win it hands down. If he's not healthy then I gotta go with Marshall winning it. I can't wait until Training Camp and the Preseason!!!

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 10:34 pm**

Bulware

Would it kill you to make a statement or write a topic line that makes sense.

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2005 10:45 pm**

I dont knowq abouty Bulware.....hes one of those guys that we will pick up and he will suddenly be over the hill

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2005 3:37 pm**

you cant even spell his name right

Posted: **Thu May 12, 2005 5:53 pm**

Hogfather wrote:
washington53 wrote:If GW thinks a rooster can lay an egg i have faith in him.

I don't have that much faith in GW, but if he asked me to run through a wall...I would

and just for the record, I was kidding about the 2-6 defense. I just wanted to make that clear, just in case you might have thought differently.

lol Hogfather i know you were kidding, i was kidding too

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2005 7:43 am**

First of all it's spelled Boulware. And we don't have the $$$ to spend on him. :twisted:

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2005 12:31 pm**

No. We have Lavar the mouth who needs to shut up and produce.

Besides, he'd cost too much.

Posted: **Fri May 13, 2005 6:54 pm**

anyone believe KFFL?

Redskins | Some Interest in Boulware - from www.KFFL.com
Fri, 13 May 2005 11:34:24 -0700

ESPN.com's Len Pasquarelli reports the Washington Redskins are showing some level of interest in free agent LB Peter Boulware (Ravens).

I personally don't want him, I really like our LBs..in fact, GW will have a hard time without him trying to determine which of our current guys will be #5, #6 and #7 LBs...Of course Special Teams is what will make and break these guys.

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2005 12:55 am**

Boulware will be paid big money by some other team based on what he did five years ago.
it won't be us. Those days are thankfully gone.

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2005 1:00 am**

Loy34 wrote:you cant even spell his name right

You can't even spell his name correctly.

Dear Moron,

Please check the above line to see how your line might have been written had you attended High School.

Posted: **Sat May 14, 2005 1:04 am**

crazyhorse1 wrote:
Loy34 wrote:you cant even spell his name right

You can't even spell his name correctly.

Dear Moron,

Please check the above line to see how your line might have been written had you attended High School.

Dear CrazyHorse...
Be prepared to be censored. I can't wait. You're contributing absolutely nothing here.
Look around you. There's higher ground to be had.

Posted: **Sun May 15, 2005 9:30 pm**

Cant afford him, no roster spots open.

Posted: **Wed May 18, 2005 7:58 pm**

THE NEWS

Free agent linebacker Peter Boulware visited Houston Tuesday to undergo a physical exam, and if the Texans are reassured about the status of Boulware's knee and toe they may make him an offer. Boulware, the Ravens' all-time sacks leader, missed all of last season with knee and toe injuries.

OUR VIEW

The Texans aren't Boulware's only suitor, as the Browns and Seahawks are among other interested parties. But the Texans have ranked near the bottom of the league in sacks each of the past three seasons and could use any help getting to the passer they can find.

http://www.fanball.com/fb/index.cfm