Page 1 of 1

Redskins to Post: You’re a Filter—We’ll Do Our Own News!

Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 10:13 pm
by Jake
Redskins to Post: You’re a Filter—We’ll Do Our Own News!

Sportswriters are used to competing for breaking news with one another. In Washington, they now have to compete for scoops with the teams they cover.

On Wednesday, the Washington Redskins signed a $31-million contract extension with wide receiver Santana Moss. Minutes later they announced the deal on their Web site, Redskins.com, and ran streaming video of an interview with his agent, Drew Rosenhaus.

The Washington Post ran the news on its Web site at about the same time. The next day’s paper ran a story with details of the deal that the Redskins would not divulge.

The gauntlet is down: The Post and the Redskins are going head to head.

“They become another competitor,” says Post sports editor Emilio Garcia-Ruiz. But he adds: “I think the fans see right through this.”

Redskins spokesman Karl Swanson says the team is ramping up its Web site and putting up news because fans couldn’t see through the “filter” of DC’s news outlets. Both Redskins owner Daniel Snyder and coach Joe Gibbs are behind the effort to portray the Redskins “unfiltered.”

“We want people to see things for themselves, as opposed to information filtered through editors or producers,” Swanson says. “Our focus is to be a news source.”

There’s nothing new in sports teams’ offering video on their Web sites. If anything, the Redskins are late to the game; the Dallas Cowboys Web site has long featured video. And there’s nothing new about a team’s trying to put its spin on a trade or a contract dispute.

But trying to scoop reporters? “What the Redskins are doing is highly unusual,” says Glen Crevier, sports editor for the Minneapolis Star Tribune and vice president of the Associated Press Sports Editors. “I am not sure of any other team using this procedure to break news.

“Obviously,” he adds, “the Redskins feel a high degree of animosity and lack of trust toward the Post. It’s an unfortunate situation to say the least.”

The Post fawned all over the Redskins when they brought back legendary coach Joe Gibbs before last season. But coverage during the season turned less friendly. Post reporter Nunyo Demasio forged relationships with players and agents and used them to break stories that didn’t always please the Redskins, especially the one about linebacker LaVar Arrington’s tussling with Snyder over $6.5 million he felt the team owed him.

Things turned uglier after the 6–10 losing season.

Gibbs was infuriated when his joke about being a short-timer as coach turned into a news story that he might leave the team. He quit his regular radio show and started to turn away from news outlets. He directed Redskins officials to figure out a better way to connect with fans.

Snyder started seriously feuding with the Post in February, after Demasio broke a story that star receiver Laveranues Coles was dissatisfied and wanted out.

Then columnist Sally Jenkins sliced and diced Snyder’s management style in a column. The Redskins yanked all but 12 of the Post’s block of corporate seats. Then the newspaper ran a piece about Snyder’s clearing a hillside on federal land between his mansion and the Potomac River to improve his view. Then Snyder gave a long, rare interview to the Washington Times.

“There definitely has been a level of frustration about getting out the complete picture of what we’re doing,” says Karl Swanson.

So the Redskins started enlarging their Web site to present their side of the story.

“At the end of the day,” says Swanson, “Dan Snyder said let’s do this.”

The Skins hired Larry Michael to develop the site and become executive producer of media. A Silver Spring native, Michael was an executive producer at Westwood One radio for 20 years before Snyder lured him to the Redskins, first to be part of Redskins radio broadcasts.

“We are in the early stages of ramping up,” Michael says. “Our goal is to be the best Web site in the NFL. We want to give you what you can’t see on TV. You haven’t seen anything yet.”

Fans can already see video of Brock Forsey working out at Redskins Park in a tryout that won him a contract. They can see Joe Gibbs explaining why the team released backup quarterback Tim Hasselbeck.

“It was on Redskins.com first,” says Swanson.

Post editor Garcia-Ruiz says to the Redskins: Bring it on.

“The notion that their news will be unfiltered is nonsense,” he says. “It will give them the chance to put their spin on the news. It’s Orwellian. The fans won't be fooled.

“If season-ticket holders complain because they can’t see the field because their seats are behind a pillar, you’re not going to see it on Redskins.com,” he says.

Will fans see more of media-shy Dan Snyder on his Web site?

Says Swanson: “If there’s a call for it.”

While you wait for the call, look for Joe Gibbs interviews every day next week.

—HARRY JAFFE
hjaffe@washingtonian.com


http://www.washingtonian.com/inwashingt ... /0506.html

Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 10:47 pm
by JPFair
“Our goal is to be the best Web site in the NFL.


I gotta say, if that's their goal they have a LOOOOONGGGG way to go. Redskins.com, as it is now, is among the absolute worst NFL team sites in the league. If they truly want to become the best site in the NFL, they have to do a 100% makeover.

Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 11:33 pm
by ATV
Funny, today after I saw the video of the tryout with the new Running Back I was close to starting a new thread pertaining to how the Redskin's website seem to increasingly push out more information. It's remarkable. I think this is a good thing anyhow - I like seeing all this footage of the players and coaches. The WP will still be around. I can't say I blame Gibbs and Co. for these actions, either...I'd be pissed too. Good for them, good for us.

Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 11:43 pm
by Skinsfan55
JP, are you being sarcastic?

When was your last visit to Redskins.com? They underwent a 100% makeover last season and it's pretty sharp. Ton of info, lots of stories and a glut of multimedia.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:01 am
by Redskins4Life
Skinsfan55 wrote:JP, are you being sarcastic?

When was your last visit to Redskins.com? They underwent a 100% makeover last season and it's pretty sharp. Ton of info, lots of stories and a glut of multimedia.


I was thinking the same thing. It's not among one of the best sites, but the worst? Definitely not

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:36 am
by JPFair
I think, since the makeover, they've improved. But to be the best website, I think they still have a long way to go. I'm glad though, cuz even though I read both the Post and The Times, I'm looking forward to Redskins.com being the most reliable and most informative site of em all.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:44 am
by vtfootball07
I checked Redskins.com every day last year for breaking news and couldn't find it, so I came here or to the Post. I love being able to go online and see streaming video of Gibbs, Williams and Cerrato speaking about different things. I really like being able to see Forsey's workout. I believe that this is all part of what Larry Michael brings to the team. Whenever I used to be in the area to watch games on TV, I would always turn the volume down on the TV and listen to Sonny, Sam, and Frank, with Larry Michael mixed in. I'm very pleased with the strides that they have been making and have no problem with them cutting the Post off.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 11:19 am
by 1niksder
www.redskins.com has made some nice improvements over the past 3 years and is getting better but the best place to get current/up to date/multi-source Redskins News is at http://www.the-hogs.net/RedskinsNews/main.php

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 11:33 am
by terps and skins
i really like the new redskins.com and how they show videos.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 11:51 am
by Michaelf382
Wait!! DID someone hear that? I think its the WAAAAAAMBULANCE coming directly through the washington posts building. What a bunch of complainers. If you are a family of 6 or 5 or whatever, and you have a father and mother that fight constantly, do you want the world to know? is it anyone elses business. NO. Same thing with the skins, who are we to fault them for trying to keep their dirty laundry in house. All the post does is add fuel trying to make a forest fire. Low and behold, everyone that is at redskins park including Gibbs and Snyder are all HUMAN! We are all prone to make mistakes. Last time I looked, noone on this earth was tapped by the hand of God to be the second coming of Christ, or for our Jewish friends, the first coming. Im sick of the post playing this Holier than thou bull. Like they arent playing dirty, paying off sources, blackmailing to get info or else they divulge someones dirty laundry. I want to scream! Im not painting the skins or anyone else for that matter as perfect, including myself, just saying noone is so stop acting like it WP

:explode:

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 12:06 pm
by El Mexican
Saying that Skins official site will give us the -- the fans -- all the info we need is absolutely ridiculous.

Imagine the White House saying: "Hey, don´t read the newspapers. We´ve got all you need right here, in our very-controlled-lip-tight-multimedia-filled-website".

Its like going back 100 years and destroying the importance the free press has had in everyones lives.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 2:22 pm
by washington53
Definatleynot the best but it has improved alot and i enjoy the video and the quick announcments

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 4:19 pm
by Irn-Bru
El Mexican wrote:Saying that Skins official site will give us the -- the fans -- all the info we need is absolutely ridiculous.

Imagine the White House saying: "Hey, don´t read the newspapers. We´ve got all you need right here, in our very-controlled-lip-tight-multimedia-filled-website".

Its like going back 100 years and destroying the importance the free press has had in everyones lives.



We're going to get the media's perspective whether we like it or not. The Redskins (unlike elected officials) aren't under any compulsion to divulge information that they don't want to give. I say, let them do what they want within league rules and let the media report whatever it can. No sense in giving them access to all sorts of things that they (and we) don't need to know about. The Redskins have simply decided that they are going to be the first to break news, and personally I'm fine with that. The WP has been editorializing spots "news" way to much to go unchecked.

I'm tired of the WP making stories up when they're bored, because then we as fans have to deal with all the articles, speculations, and 'expert analysis' from places like ESPN. And a lot of times it's for things that are severely stretched truths (for instance, most reported drama having to do with Lavar Arrington).

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 6:36 pm
by Fios
The Post has itself to thank for this turn of events. And trust me, having worked for a newspaper in the Redskins coverage area, the Post is panicking about this despite the public face they put on it. Newspapers are already in serious circulation decline and the Post counts on the Redskins to stem that tide.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 8:30 pm
by joebagadonuts
JPFair wrote:I think, since the makeover, they've improved. But to be the best website, I think they still have a long way to go. I'm glad though, cuz even though I read both the Post and The Times, I'm looking forward to Redskins.com being the most reliable and most informative site of em all.


what team sites would you say are the best? i'd be interested to take a peek.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:57 pm
by Deadskins
El Mexican wrote:Saying that Skins official site will give us the -- the fans -- all the info we need is absolutely ridiculous.

Imagine the White House saying: "Hey, don´t read the newspapers. We´ve got all you need right here, in our very-controlled-lip-tight-multimedia-filled-website".

Its like going back 100 years and destroying the importance the free press has had in everyones lives.

Doesn't the White House say that right now? We no longer have a free press. All the media in this country is owned and controlled by six multi-national conglomerates. You only get the news they want you to hear.

Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 10:22 pm
by JPFair
I used to think that Carolina had one of the best, and the absolute worst was Denver. But, lately, I've noticed that they all seem to be singing from the same music sheet, i.e. the NFL has stricter control over it all, and more and more they're trying to make each site similar, if not the same as the other.