Page 1 of 1
K2 All Over Again?
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 7:57 pm
by Clinton Portis
Was Mike Williams K2...and Carlos Rodgers- Sean Taylor?
It looks like a bad choice now....and some people would have rather had Mike...but I get a feeling that this is a really good pick!
Lets go SKINS!
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:02 pm
by oafusp
ALL I KNOW IS THAT THE REDSKINS OFFENSE WAS RANKED #30 LAST SEASON.
THE DEFENSE WAS RANKED #3
A N D
WE LOST 2 STARTING WIDE RECEIVERS AND REPLACED THEM WITH 2 SMALL RECEIVERS AND ONE OF THEM IS HOLDING OUT ALREADY.
A N D
WE COULD HAVE SOLVED THE WHOLE FREAKIN PROBLEM BY RESIGNING A PROVEN STARTING CORNER BACK INSTEAD OF LETTING HIM WALK.
WE TOOK A HALF A STEP FORWARD AND 5 STEPS BACK.
MIKW WILLIAMS FELL TO OUR LAP AND WE PASSED AND OVER PAID FOR 2 PLAYERS.
DRUNK AND PISSED OFF.
RESPECT MY OPINION.
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:07 pm
by Redskin in Canada
While #9 pick is still debatable to some.(I would have picked M. Williams immediately). The killer was #25 which is NOT necessary and if even if it was necessary, way too expensive when other more urgent spots needed to be addressed in the short term.
Can the Skins survive disatrous and awful expensive QB selections year after year?
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:15 pm
by oafusp
Redskin in Canada wrote:While #9 pick is still debatable to some.(I would have picked M. Williams immediately). The killer was #25 which is NOT necessary and if even if it was necessary, way too expensive when other more urgent spots needed to be addressed in the short term.
Can the Skins survive disatrous and awful expensive QB selections year after year?
No, they cant...and wont
Why trade away next years 1st round pick, 4th round pick and this years 4th round pick when they could have just traded Gardner and next years 2nd round pick to move up to the 2nd round to select Campbell?
What? what am I saying?
They should not even drafted him in the first place.
This is how bas it has got. It is hard to even think of how or why or what if.
DEBACLE, DEBACLE