Page 1 of 1

Robert Blake Acquitted of Murder

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:48 am
by Jake
Actor Walks After Marathon Trial
By GREG RISLING, AP

LOS ANGELES (March 16) - Robert Blake left court playing a role he hasn't known for a long time: that of a man no longer charged with killing his wife, no longer cast as the lead villain in a bizarre murder trial.

The 71-year-old star of the 1970s detective drama ''Baretta'' was acquitted of murder Wednesday in the 2001 shooting death of his wife, bringing a dramatic end to a trial that played out like 1940s film noir.

The former tough-guy actor sobbed uncontrollably at the defense table, embraced his attorney and exhaled heavily as the verdicts sank in. His lawyers at his side, Blake later stood before a phalanx of reporters and delivered a rambling speech in which he said, ''this small band of dedicated warriors saved my life.''

At one point, Blake asked whether anyone in the audience had something to remove his electronic monitoring bracelet. He then bent down and cut off the device.

''If you want to know how to go through $10 million in five years, ask me,'' said Blake, who was free on bail during his trial but under house arrest. ''I'm broke. I need a job.''

The jury also acquitted Blake of one charge of trying to get someone to kill Bonny Lee Bakley. The jury was deadlocked on a second solicitation charge, voting 11-1 in favor of acquittal. The judge dismissed the count.

The jury of seven men and five women delivered the verdicts on its ninth day of deliberations, following a trial with a cast a characters that included two Hollywood stuntmen who said Blake tried to get them to bump off his wife.

Blake had faced life in prison; prosecutors did not seek the death penalty.

Blake was charged with shooting the 44-year-old Bakley in their car outside the actor's favorite Italian restaurant on May 4, 2001, less than six months after their marriage.

Defense attorney M. Gerald Schwartzbach called it a weak case built largely on the testimony of the two stuntmen - both of whom were once heavy drug users.

No eyewitnesses, blood or DNA evidence linked Blake to the crime. The murder weapon, found in a trash bin, could not be traced to Blake, and witnesses said the minuscule amounts of gunshot residue found on Blake's hands could have come from a different gun he said he carried for protection.

''They couldn't put the gun in his hand,'' jury foreman Thomas Nicholson told reporters outside court, adding the case lacked evidence that could ''connect all the links in the chain.''

Bakley's daughter Holly Gawron, 24, said she was shocked by the verdicts and looked forward to her family's wrongful death lawsuit against Blake. The trial in that case is set to begin July 7.

''I hope somehow that I will be able to find some justice, some form of punishment for him, because he's off celebrating his freedom for murdering my mother,'' she said. ''It's very hard to deal with.''

Prosecutors said Blake believed his wife trapped him into a loveless marriage by getting pregnant. They said Blake soon became smitten with the baby, Rosie, and desperately wanted to keep the child away from Bakley, whom he considered an unfit mother.

Bakley had been married several times, had a record for mail fraud and made a living scamming men out of money with nude pictures of herself and promises of sex.

''He was tricked by Bonny Lee and he hated her for it,'' prosecutor Shellie Samuels said in closing arguments. ''He got taken by a small-time grifter.''

The four-month trial was part of a wave of celebrity court cases in California that have provided endless fodder for the tabloids and cable networks. The Michael Jackson child molestation trial was starting just as the Blake case was wrapping up, and rock 'n' roll producer Phil Spector will stand trial later this year in Los Angeles for allegedly murdering a B-movie actress.

In another murder case seemingly made for the tabloids, Scott Peterson was sent to death row just a few hours before the Blake verdict for killing his pregnant wife and her unborn fetus.

Blake has been in front of the camera from childhood, back when he was sad-eyed little Mickey in the ''Our Gang'' movie shorts, and portrayed a killer who dies on the gallows in the 1967 movie ''In Cold Blood.''

In ''Baretta,'' Blake played a tough-talking, street-smart detective whose catchphrase was ''Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.''

Those acting successes seemed well in the past by the time a divorced and lonely Blake met Bakley at a jazz club five years ago. They had sex in his truck that night, and she was soon carrying Blake's child. They were wed in 2000 in a no-frills ceremony at which the bride wore an electronic monitoring bracelet because she was still on probation for fraud.

Prosecutors said Blake killed his wife after failing to persuade a street thug-turned-minister and two stuntmen from his ''Baretta'' days to do the job. One of the stuntmen said Blake talked about having Bakley ''snuffed'' and mentioned locations for the killing, including the Grand Canyon.

Also, a former detective who worked for Blake as a private investigator testified that the actor proposed to kidnap Bakley, force her to have an abortion and, if that did not work, ''whack her.''

The defense portrayed the stuntmen as drug users prone to hallucinations and delusions, and jurors appeared to agree. The foreman called testimony from one ''disjointed and so irregular'' and considered the other ''a prolific liar.''

Blake told authorities that he walked his wife to the car after dinner, then discovered he had left his gun back in the booth at Vitello's Restaurant. He went back to get it, then returned to the car and found his wife shot, he said.

But some witnesses testified that Blake did not appear to be sincere as he wept and moaned over the slaying that night. One witness said the actor appeared to be ''turning it on and off.''

Blake did not testify. But his lawyer showed the jury a videotape of a jailhouse interview with Barbara Walters in which he denied killing his wife.

''It's all about Rosie. It's always been about Rosie,'' Blake said. ''The greatest gift in the world, and I'm going to try to mess it up by being selfish?''

Rosie, now 4, is being raised by Blake's adult daughter.


AP-NY-03-16-05 19:42 EST

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.


http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article ... 0000000001

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:01 am
by redskindave
Unlike the Scott Peterson case, I think they blew it on this one.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:10 am
by NC43Hog
Interesting how both verdicts came about the same time?

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 11:24 am
by SkinsChic
Another Celeb gets away with murder....IMO !

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:13 pm
by Skinsfan55
In the Civil Trial Robert Blake will get some of what he deserves.

After the trial is over and the Bakely family wins Blake will never be able to profit from Bonnie Lee's murder, any money he makes will be going right to the family of the victim...

We should take some solace in the fact that he's ruined financially...

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:30 pm
by Texas Hog
I may take some heat on this one....but I'm not convinced he did it. I don't think he's that stupid.

Also, although there's no excuse to kill....Bakley was worthless.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:34 pm
by Skinsfan55
You think that someone randomly shot an innocent woman in exactly the fashion that Robert Blake wanted at the exact time Blake had NO alibi?

Hmmmm, I guess I have some nice real estate in Florida you might be interested in.

Oh, and calling a murder victim worthless doesn't show a whole lot of character.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:37 pm
by JansenFan
he had a perfect alibi, He was inside the restaurant looking for his gun in front of a whole room of people.

I still think he was ultimately responsible, but they could not make the connection without reasonable doubt, therefore he could not be convicted.

The Justice system is more about technicalities than Justice these days.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:39 pm
by Skinsfan55
JansenFan wrote:The Justice system is more about technicalities than Justice these days.


Especially when dealing with celebs... :?

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:41 pm
by JansenFan
:up:

You got that right......anyone have an update on how OJ's search for the real killers is going. I heard they were progressing really well....he see's them every morning when he's brushing his teeth.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:46 pm
by Skinsfan55
OJ was able to keep his head above water financially because he could just sign some footballs and sell some memorabilia... Blake won't be so lucky, he's ruined.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:53 pm
by Texas Hog
if you want to challenge my character...take it to smack....otherwise I stick with my opinion, thank you

just because a person is murdered, doesn't clean the slate of their past disingenuousness, conniving and disgraces.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:57 pm
by Skinsfan55
Everyone gets their name dragged through the mud when the public spotlight shines on their private life. Especially when the person is the victim of a crime and attorneys try to blame the victim for their own murder, rape etc.

What did Bonnie do? Sell nude photographs? Oh dear, the angered townspeople should have sent a posse after her!

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:07 pm
by Texas Hog

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:15 pm
by NC43Hog
None of this justifies bringing someones "Character" into the discussion Skinsfan55. Keep it civil or take it to smack.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:29 pm
by Skinsfan55
NC43Hog wrote:None of this justifies bringing someones "Character" into the discussion Skinsfan55. Keep it civil or take it to smack.


I completely stand by my earlier statement, sorry if you disagree but calling a murder victim worthless, regardless of circumstances is reprehensable in my opinion, and shows weak character.

I'd usually give someone the benefit of the doubt on such an issue and dismiss this as a temporary slip up where one forgets, for a moment, the value of human life, but the latest link shows a desire to prove that Bonnie Lee Bakely is worthless and perhaps that she even deserved to die.

You may convince me that someone is sleazy, someone is morally relaxed, someone is mean, hateful or crazy but you're going to have to go a long, long way to make the argument that someone deserved to die or that their life was worthless.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:33 pm
by JansenFan
I think you are missing the point, my friend. What they are saying is that if you want to attack someone's character, the appropriate place to do so is in smack.

The rule is to attack the post, not the poster in other forums. Attacking TH's character is OK, as long as it is done in accordance with the rules.

Clearly we are not in smack, and therefore not in accordance with the rules.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:40 pm
by The Hogster
Somehow I knew OJ's name would come up. But, what kind of alibi did Blake have?
"It couldn't have been me, I was looking for my gun. Darnit I always seem to leave that dang 45 lying around. And when I came back...low and behold someone mozied on up and shot my wife, and rubbed gun residue on my hand" Oh and it was mere coincidence that I had asked people to kill her before.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:48 pm
by Skinsfan55
I didn't say anything other than perhaps his response showed a weak character. That's open to a lot of different options. He could clarify his point, and show how he was misunderstood or he could take the low road...

I don't see what the problem is, it's not like I just came out swinging and started slamming someone for no reason, it's not even like I just came out with a blanket statement that said "hey TH has weak character!" I said a statement he made showed weak character, there is a HUGE difference!

Say I'm a presidential speechwritter and I'm helping the president work on his speech... if I say "Mr. President that's not the best choice of words, that gives an impression of weak character..." am I insulting the President? Of course not.

Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:56 pm
by JansenFan
Skinsfan55 wrote:You think that someone randomly shot an innocent woman in exactly the fashion that Robert Blake wanted at the exact time Blake had NO alibi?

Hmmmm, I guess I have some nice real estate in Florida you might be interested in.

Oh, and calling a murder victim worthless doesn't show a whole lot of character.


Your response above does not addess the post, but rather the character of the poster, thus the reaction you got.