DAVID BOSTON
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:36 am
WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK OF DAVID BOSTON? DO YOU THINK HE'S COMMANDING A BIG CONTRACT GOOD BE THE BIG RECEIVER WE NEED IF WE GOT BOSTON WE COULD FOCUS ON THE D IN THE DRAFT JUST AN IDEA
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
DAVID BOSTON
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:47 am
I am conflicted. On one hand I say no way to that headcase but on the other hand if he has his act together and is cheap then why not?? Better play it safe and stay far far away
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:09 am
He failed his physical. Thats why he was cut. Also, that guys crazy. Dont you remember, he was suspended for a 2 games b/c he got his nipples pierced and he didnt want to get hit a practice b/c it hurt. Please, send him to the CFL.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:06 am
not a chance. That guy is so ripped that every time he gets hit, you risk breaking a bone...
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:35 am
YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THAT WHOLE NIPPLE THING IS UPSERD
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:43 am
I'm sure his nipples are fine now. If he wants to come catch some balls for the Redskins for cheap. Why not?
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 9:06 am
gibbs#1 wrote:YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THAT WHOLE NIPPLE THING IS UPSERD
Dude, lay off the caps lock!
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 9:16 am
gibbs#1 wrote:YOU GUYS ARE RIGHT THAT WHOLE NIPPLE THING IS UPSERD
Well, he spelled "nipple" right.
Anyway, the knock (physically, that is) on Boston has always been the same thing: the man has the ankles of an eleven year old. Sure, he's got some major upper body development...but no ankles.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:45 am
That's all we need, another WR. But this one has a head case. No thanks.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:09 pm
frankcal20 wrote:Please, send him to the CFL.
I would be happy to take in the CFL.
However, I wouldn't mind seeing him in a 'Skins uni. He has the same structure as TO and is just as gifted.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:22 pm
No way gibbs gives this roid muncher a look. He cut a player at the start of the season just for getting arrested for being drunk in public.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:28 pm
Sure, he's got some major upper body development...but no ankles.
I believe that has something to do with the steroids he took. I heard that steroids builds ones muscles at a fast rate that exceeds the growth of the bones. The result is you have a guy who is 260 lbs of solid muscle, but has the bone strength of a man who is 180 lbs.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:59 pm
I agree skinsfan1. Gibbs won't look this way to improve the WR core.
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:56 pm
Overusage of steroids kills your joints.
Too much strain.
A lot of the stories you hear about steroids are true.
'Cept these usually only happen when someone overuses them. If you use them at a safe rate, you'll be fine. Idiots like Boston just make it obvious
Too much strain.
A lot of the stories you hear about steroids are true.
'Cept these usually only happen when someone overuses them. If you use them at a safe rate, you'll be fine. Idiots like Boston just make it obvious
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:56 am
[quote="Hill66"][quote="frankcal20"]Please, send him to the CFL.[/quote]
I would be happy to take in the CFL.
However, I wouldn't mind seeing him in a 'Skins uni. He has the same structure as TO and is just as gifted.[/quote]
The CFL is where 90% of football players go to die. Dont get me wrong, i watch the games on MSG network but he wont be wearing the B&G next year or any year for that matter. That guy is crazy.
I would be happy to take in the CFL.
However, I wouldn't mind seeing him in a 'Skins uni. He has the same structure as TO and is just as gifted.[/quote]
The CFL is where 90% of football players go to die. Dont get me wrong, i watch the games on MSG network but he wont be wearing the B&G next year or any year for that matter. That guy is crazy.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 4:05 am
We don't need a D.Boston we got a DMac!
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:44 pm
No need for him, but he could turn things around - is his pops still a ref?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:55 pm
Yea, but he's not allowed to ref games in-division of Boston or games that would have implications on his team or teams that if they won or lost would have implications.Scooter wrote:No need for him, but he could turn things around - is his pops still a ref?
Whew. Understood?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:47 pm
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:41 pm
Good!skinsfan1 wrote:He's going to San Fran.
Can you imagine the damage to the game in the CFL?
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:20 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Good!skinsfan1 wrote:He's going to San Fran.
Can you imagine the damage to the game in the CFL?
I can't imagine, but send a guy like that to the Eskimos or the Stamps would be hilarious! He’d probably some how get his nipple ring frozen to his tongue. Although he’d probably fit in perfect in Montreal.