Page 1 of 1

what we really need!!!

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:47 pm
by skins#1fan
look guys its obvious that we have no passing game or a deep threat. We need a tall physical wide out. I dont want a short fast guy that has good hands. We have coles as of now and jacobs with speed and thrash. We need a tall physical go to guy like edwards. I like him because He stayed his last year which shows some character instead of rushing. All the other teams do is stack the line of scrimmage against us because there not worried about getting beat deep. If we get Edwards and then you put the speed in jacobs,"coles" and thrash and mccants around this guy we would be dangerous

Re: what we really need!!!

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:40 pm
by Jake
skins#1fan wrote:We need a tall physical wide out.


Darnerien McCants.

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:44 pm
by sch1977
McCants is a joke. We need someone who is a gamebreaker!

Re: what we really need!!!

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:48 pm
by 1niksder
Jake wrote:
skins#1fan wrote:We need a tall physical wide out.


Darnerien McCants.

Thread Killer :wink:

But I agree Darnerien can fill this role as he has in the pass. Going into camp he'll have something to proof and I think he'll get his point accros.

That being said I also think we'll pick up a WR to stretch the field that is also tall we have Jacobs to fill the role of the small speedy wideout

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:00 pm
by patjam77
Mcants won't be the game breaker we need. maybe a #3 guy but not the stud the skins need.

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
by 1niksder
What we really need is......
...to bring back our Defensive FAs and sign Reggie Hayward from Denver


Position: DE
Height: 6-5
Weight: 270
Born: 03/14/1979
College: Iowa State
NFL Experience: 4
2004 Stats: Total 43 Tackles 31.0 Assist 12 Sacks 10.5 Forced fumbles 1 Interceptions 1

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 pm
by Redskins4Life
1niksder wrote:What we really need is......
...to bring back our Defensive FAs and sign Reggie Hayward from Denver


Position: DE
Height: 6-5
Weight: 270
Born: 03/14/1979
College: Iowa State
NFL Experience: 4
2004 Stats: Total 43 Tackles 31.0 Assist 12 Sacks 10.5 Forced fumbles 1 Interceptions 1


Hayward would be an EXCELLENT pickup. Not too expensive, moderately priced, and a young player waiting to break out ala Cornelius Griffin or Marcus Washington.... Good speed pass rusher whos solid against the run, something we're lacking at DE (unless you count C. Clemons but he's more of a situation pass rusher)

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 am
by jdmills23
You said it yourself he is waiting for that break out year. The size is perfect for a DE, 6-5 270 is pretty nice. I haven't seen any threads on this guy, do you have any?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:36 am
by Hill66
sch1977 wrote:McCants is a joke. We need someone who is a gamebreaker!

Okay...I disagree.
He led our offense in 2003 with 6 TD's. He is exactly what you want in a tall possession WR. What is your explanation to this statement. Support your answer...the only time I would've accepted that was if you said...
Brunell is a joke...but that is a whole different ball game.. :lol:

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:21 am
by coachKarl
Edwards reminds me of Gardener, drops alot of passes,trade down and draft Troy Williamson.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:34 am
by Jake
Hill66 wrote:
sch1977 wrote:McCants is a joke. We need someone who is a gamebreaker!

Okay...I disagree.
He led our offense in 2003 with 6 TD's. He is exactly what you want in a tall possession WR. What is your explanation to this statement. Support your answer...the only time I would've accepted that was if you said...
Brunell is a joke...but that is a whole different ball game.. :lol:


My sentiments, exactly.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:09 pm
by terps and skins
lmao about your napoleon dynamite quote at the bottom...
im in for that reggie heyward guy, seems like he could be a stud...that would clear our defensive end struggle, and wouldnt have to focus on that in the draft.

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:31 pm
by FanofallthatisGibbs
We are in a can't lose situation - there will be a great WR, DE, or CB by position 9. We take whatever best player is available by then.

If Smoot is gone, then I think CB might be the best use of the pick, or trade down, get Pollack and some CB later in the draft.