Page 1 of 1
Moss better than Coles?
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:57 pm
by truskinsfan18
I believe Moss can equal or surpass teh production of coles, be cause Coles may not be as much of a big play reciver, and also coles has an injured toe which may be holding him back
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:02 pm
by truskinsfan18
Cant go wrong with a player from the U
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:02 pm
by hatsOFF2gibbs
I don't know if Moss is better than Coles but he'd do fine in our offense. We need a person like him who isn't necessarily big but, quick.
I would be happy if we got him without giving one of our draft picks.
Plus, he'll be cheaper right?
Maybe I overreacted before but our WR position MIGHT just work out.........Please???
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:25 pm
by JansenFan
hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:I don't know if Moss is better than Coles but he'd do fine in our offense. We need a person like him who isn't necessarily big but, quick.
I would be happy if we got him without giving one of our draft picks.
Plus, he'll be cheaper right?
Maybe I overreacted before but our WR position MIGHT just work out.........Please???

Call security!! Someone stole hatsOff's login information and is posting optomistically!!
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 1:36 pm
by hatsOFF2gibbs
Hahaha...... come on now! I'm not that much of a downer am I?

Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:25 pm
by patjam77
Moss is not better than coles. This stinks. Oh well, maybe it will work out.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:44 pm
by USS Redskin
To hell with Coles - I used to be a big fan of his but if he wants to cry and whine, send his dumb ass packin.
I hope the Moss deal happens...
What a jerk Coles is, asking to be released after what the Skins gave up for him and he just wants an outright release. I hope they screw him over good.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:47 pm
by SkinsJock
I think we can all agree that Coles is better but he does not seem to want to be here! Hopefully SMoss does and so now we hope we get a football player for LC and his "need" to be off this team!
There are some things that need to get done before this simple exchange takes place!
This could be good for both teams although I'm sure there are a lot of ny fans who would not agree. But then if you are a ny fan you do not agree about much anyway!
Re: Moss better than Coles?
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:32 pm
by skinsfan#33
truskinsfan18 wrote:I believe Moss can equal or surpass teh production of coles, be cause Coles may not be as much of a big play reciver, and also coles has an injured toe which may be holding him back
The injured toe version of Coles is better than SMoss. A healthy Coles is WWWAAAYYY!!! better than Moss. And Mr. Santana hasn't exactly been healthy him self.
This sounds a lot like the Portis/Bailly trade, the Brunell trade, and every other trade the Skins have made since Danny boy has been in charge: they get what they want but pay WAY too much for it. The Bronco should have given us the 2nd round pick. If you don't think "the Danny" is pushing this trade, think again. Remember four years ago "the Danny" deserately wanted Moss over Gardner and could have drafted him, but he let Schotty draft 50/50 instead. Just think, we could have just drafted Moss then. This team will always end up on the short end of trades for 2 reasons. "The Danny" must get the guy he wants, no matter the cost and this team can't keep anything a secret from the press. The "official source" all need to have their lips sown together!
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 7:05 pm
by DallasCowboysFan
I will take all the 90 catch receivers you want to get rid of! I can't believe there are so many wanting to get rid of this guy. Santana had half that last year.
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 7:24 pm
by ChillWill
This trade stinks. Moss is the guy Snyder wanted several years ago.
There is no comparison between Coles and Moss. The Redskins must be convinced that Coles is damaged beyond repair.
We are eating too much of the cap.
This is a recipe for catastrophe.