Page 1 of 1
surtain for gardner
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:05 pm
by BigSkinNig
maybe itll happen with smoot gone and people about chambers far fetched but just putting it out there
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:24 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Welcome to the board! Interesting name there.
I'd prefer getting a draft pick for Gardner, rather than a free agent. We need to build for the future through the draft. We're gonna sign free agents anyway, why waste the Gardner trade on another. We're short on draft picks.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:32 pm
by EasyMoney
Too many wide receivers in Miami already.
Re: surtain for gardner
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:33 pm
by redskincity
BigSkinNig wrote:maybe itll happen with smoot gone and people about chambers far fetched but just putting it out there
This may be a possibility.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:48 pm
by Mike
Maimi does not need to spend any more money on recievers...David Boston was out all season with an injury, so i believe they are fine at that WR spot.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:01 pm
by SkinsHead56
Mike wrote:Maimi does not need to spend any more money on recievers...David Boston was out all season with an injury, so i believe they are fine at that WR spot.
I forgot the Fish have that 'roided garbage on their team. Maybe they will want Gardner after all.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Gardner for Boston?
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:11 pm
by Mike
I would do that in a sec 
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:10 pm
by SkinsHead56
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Gardner for Boston?
Mike wrote:I would do that in a sec 

I'm not sure why this is even being mentioned (except as a joke... a very bad joke). If Gibbs would not go for Moss then forgetaboutit. Boston put the crap in crap. This guy is a terrible, non team player, over sized, underachiving, bad 'tude, 'roided, legal problem having, overpaid garbage bin.

ok I'll stop now.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:40 pm
by washington53
i would do that in a second too... But Miami wouldnt bc they have enough recievers
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:53 pm
by Clinton Portis
Boston was a success back when he wuz with the Cards...
Then he started doing steroids and that really changed him for the worst. Now he's a slow reciever, with serious water retention problems in his muscles. He is always in legal trouble too...good pickup THEN...not good now.
THEN
G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2000 Arizona Cardinals 16 16 71 1156 16.3 70 7 17 7 48
2001 Arizona Cardinals 16 15 98 1598 16.3 61 8 28 7 72
NOW
2003 San Diego Chargers 14 14 70 880 12.6 46 7 13 2 42
Or at least recently. His numbers decreased in San Diego, and he'll never be as good as he was in 00-01.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:58 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
*continues to stir the pot*
So Boston for Gardner isn't a good deal?

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:59 pm
by Clinton Portis
How about sign Givens, and ask for a pick for Gardner from the Pats or Oakland.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:02 pm
by tcwest10
Boston is a complete physical specimen...until you get to the ankles. His ankles are like a little kid's wrists.
He's also egocentric. Not that this is uncommon, but definitely not something you look for when coupled with the injury issues.
Maybe if his Dad comes with him as part of the deal....
We could have an official in our pocket, just like Dallas does !!

Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:03 pm
by Ramsey's Hog
It would probably be better if we were able to pick up a draft pick. We sold our draft picks for other players in seasons past and it hasn't panned out that well, so let's try the opposite.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:04 pm
by Redskins4Life
If we could get Surtain for Gardner I would go crazy... Surtain is a pro bowl caliber corner whos still young for Gardner who is good IMO but will not fetch us anything better. I like this deal. As for Boston, dont even say something stupid like that
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:13 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Redskins4Life wrote:If we could get Surtain for Gardner I would go crazy... Surtain is a pro bowl caliber corner whos still young for Gardner who is good IMO but will not fetch us anything better. I like this deal. As for Boston, dont even say something stupid like that
Im going to ask for Boss to include [sarcasm][/sarcsm] tags on this board.
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:41 pm
by chicosbailbond
they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..
Miami is 17 million over the cap... If we are going to pluck anyone from their roster it should be Jason Taylor... He would make our D pretty damn nasty... with both of our safeties healthy and lavar back with Jason Taylor... that is almost 85 bears... or 89 eagles....
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:24 am
by Redskin in Canada
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Gardner for Boston?
YIKES!!!

Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:40 am
by ArmyHog
I saw this on ESPN.com yesterday and thought about posting this very suggestion.
I like the idea, but Surtain already has said he wants top notch pay. If we can't afford Smoot, then I think it will be hard to get Surtain.
Although it would be great to see.......
********************************************
they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..
If I were Miami, I would go after Larry Johnson. He made a statement this year, and is much younger. Holmes also has some injury issues.

Boston 4 RG
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:24 am
by Malicious
Chris Luva Luva wrote:*continues to stir the pot*
So Boston for Gardner isn't a good deal?

I for one wouldn't mind seeing this trade. Couldn't see it realistically happening.
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:15 am
by coachKarl
Surtain will want the big bucks, we might as well pay Smoot .
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:11 pm
by trey53
Ooo! Ooo! Yeah, let's get Boston!
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3371390
Nuff said.
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:59 pm
by chicosbailbond
ArmyHog wrote:I saw this on ESPN.com yesterday and thought about posting this very suggestion.
I like the idea, but Surtain already has said he wants top notch pay. If we can't afford Smoot, then I think it will be hard to get Surtain.
Although it would be great to see.......
********************************************
they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..
If I were Miami, I would go after Larry Johnson. He made a statement this year, and is much younger. Holmes also has some injury issues.

If I were Miami I would want Johnson too... but you are correct that he made a statement... and that is why they are willing to deal priest...
Surtain is better than smoot... we can pay either one... the question is... is it worth it..???
cover corners aren't worth all of that money... isn't that what we were saying last year when champ left... we can just get by with a second tier guy...
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:29 pm
by Cooley47
lets just hope we keep Smooty