Page 1 of 1
Andre Davis of the Cleveland Browns
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:23 am
by 1niksder
From a Washington Times Article....
Speaking of the Browns, instead of becoming infatuated with Randy Moss — that is, assuming he's available — the Redskins should look into trading Rod Gardner to Cleveland for former Virginia Techie
Andre Davis. The latter would give Joe Gibbs a (modestly priced) deep threat — with brains to boot — and Gardner brings a certain ruggedness to the table, which might appeal to a defensive guy like Romeo Crennel, rumored to be the Browns' next coach.
http://www.washtimes.com/sports/2005012 ... -7336r.htm

Good Idea

Bad Idea

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 6:36 am
by Jeremy81
if we could get a draft pick with it..yeah
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:12 am
by coachKarl
We have some good wideouts on the roster, Taylor Jacobs is going to have a break out year, We need to pick a wide out in the draft .
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:31 am
by 4bz
I've always like andre davis, but he never got much PT, because for a while the browns were stacked at WR. I wouldn't mind this trade.... Here's his stats:
Year Team G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2002 Cleveland Browns 16 4 37 420 11.4 31 6 6 0 25
2003 Cleveland Browns 16 8 40 576 14.4 49 5 8 1 31
2004 Cleveland Browns 7 7 16 416 26.0 99 2 7 3 14
TOTAL 39 19 93 1412 15.2 99 13 21 4 70
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 4:31 pm
by Redskins4Life
I wouldn't be opposed to this idea, but I would much rather get a second round pick
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:08 pm
by Skinsfan55
Davis isn't bigger or better than any of our other wide recievers... and why would we trade Gardner for him anyway? Rod Gardner is twice as good as Davis.
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 6:16 pm
by Redskins4Life
although I do think Gardner is better than Davis, it seems likely that Gardner will never be utilized in a Skins offense so taking a chance of a big, fast reciever with potential wouldnt be a BAD idea, but still not a good one
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 9:12 pm
by Sanjoso
I would say thumbs up but a draft pick with it would be increddible.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:18 am
by air_hog
hey, he did get a 99 yd TD this year
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:23 am
by Redskin in Canada
As long as Gardner is traded, I am not too picky abot the level of the pick in the draft or what other position is fixed. I just gave up on him.
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:31 am
by washington53
i have no problem getting Andre Davis. Then we could get a monster DE from our picks
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:08 am
by Chris Luva Luva
Redskins4Life wrote:I wouldn't be opposed to this idea, but I would much rather get a second round pick
I don't want Davis, we need a pick. The pick is worth more.