Page 1 of 1

... calling all 'non-locals' for Team Needs

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 12:35 pm
by BossHog
We're putting together the team needs section for the draft section and it dawned on me that this might be a good topic of conversation for a thread.

If you live in an NFL city other than Washington... tell us what the pulse of the free agency situation is at 'home'.

Texan Redskin fans... what are they saying are team needs for the Cowpukes and the Texans... California skins fans... what's the word on the 49ers or the Raiders.

... get the drift?

We don't just want regurgitated lists... other people's links... we're looking for the opinions of the fans that live there and what THEY think the teams are looking for this offseason.

:feedback;

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:08 pm
by skinz74
I'm pretty sure that myself and 1niksder can handle Jacksonville, FL.

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:52 pm
by 1niksder
Looks like the Jags will have some of the same needs that the Skins have this offseason
The Jags need ....
1. a pass rushing end, in 04 they started the year shorthanded when they couldn't find a replacement for Tony Brackens. During the seasin all of the DE went down due to injury at some point during the season.

2. A pass catching TE, Kyle Brady was on his last leg in 04

3. A solid CB to replace Fernado Bryants (to Detriot in 04) replacement Deon Grant (from Caroline in 04)
Del Rio just isn't happy with his play

they will also be looking at
K - OLB - C

Jacksonville is about $22 million under the cap and the names you keep hearing on the radio are Jerry Porter,Plaxico and Mike William (they know he'll be gone by the time they pick but they talk about him anyway)

Jimmy Smith could use some help

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:06 pm
by Smithian
To my north, the Rams and Chiefs need a defense.

To my east, the Titans need everything.

To my south, the Saints need even more of everything.

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:21 pm
by Scooter
I feel sorry for Saints fans - if there are any left. Just dismal...

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 7:25 pm
by Texas Hog
Saints fans are probably saying the same thing about us.

At least they beat the pukes this season. That was a sweet thing to watch. :)

Here's what I'm hearing on the pukes:

Defense was this season's biggest source of frustration with no playmakers and giving up big play after big play. Parcells is considering the idea of converting to a 3-4, and some believe wholesale changes at LB could be made. I believe that's unlikely, as they neither have the personnel or the coaching expertise (Mike Zimmer - D Coordinator) to convert to a 3-4. They have small DE's or players that would fill the DE role in a 3-4 in Greg Ellis (6'6", 277) and La'Roi Glover (6'2", 285) and small starting outside LBs from last year in Al Singleton and Dexter Coakley. Zimmer has always built his defenses in little D on speed. They do have two young prospective LBs that fit the 3-4 mold in Kalen Thornton and Bradie James. We're told to expect more two-gap formations, but a full time switch appears unlikely.

Among the defense's other needs are a right corner, safety and help at defensive tackle and end to produce some sort of pass rush.

On offense, fans are dying to hear how the QB situation is going to be addressed. I for one didn't think Vinny Testaverde (17 TDs, 20 picks) had that bad of a year or that the offense played that poorly. They didn't however learn anything about Drew Henson. Needs include a speed receiver, a complimentary RB to share carries with Jones and help on the OL at guard and tackle.

With $18-20 million in cap space and 2 first rounders, 11th and 20th (Buffalo), look for the Tuna to not make the same mistake as last off season of not spending Jerry's money.

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 9:35 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Bosshog will check the Hamilton Tiger-Cats and the Toronto Argonauts while I check on the Montreal Alouettes.

:shock: :shock: :shock:

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:47 pm
by Smithian
Texas Hog wrote:Defense was this season's biggest source of frustration with no playmakers and giving up big play after big play. Parcells is considering the idea of converting to a 3-4, and some believe wholesale changes at LB could be made. I believe that's unlikely, as they neither have the personnel or the coaching expertise (Mike Zimmer - D Coordinator) to convert to a 3-4. They have small DE's or players that would fill the DE role in a 3-4 in Greg Ellis (6'6", 277) and La'Roi Glover (6'2", 285) and small starting outside LBs from last year in Al Singleton and Dexter Coakley. Zimmer has always built his defenses in little D on speed. They do have two young prospective LBs that fit the 3-4 mold in Kalen Thornton and Bradie James. We're told to expect more two-gap formations, but a full time switch appears unlikely.
We're? Um... You mean you're a Cowboy fan...? Is that who you're referring to as "we're"?

:lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:53 am
by air_hog
In California on all the local news stations their saying that Oakland is on the verge of trading Philip Buchannon and the 7th pick for Randy Moss, then landing either Ricky Williams or Travis Henry. The Niners wanted the two for one deal in Norm Chow and Matt Lienart but that got flushed away and I heard that they are after Drew Brees. However the Chargers are looking to slap a Franchise Tag of Brees. And there are talks of the NFL in LA again...

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:18 pm
by Scooter
With two picks in the first round already - the Chargers will gain another, and one in 06 for Brees. I think the Packers might go after Brees - even if Favre stays another year.

As for the Raiders - Moss and Williams are perfect for Norvell & Al. Can you drug test an entire team? That's a big Win for the Vikes if it happens.

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:35 pm
by Jake
Texas Hog wrote:On offense, fans are dying to hear how the QB situation is going to be addressed.


Cowboys QB roster unlikely to change for '05

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:40 pm
by Texas Hog
Smithian wrote:
Texas Hog wrote:Defense was this season's biggest source of frustration with no playmakers and giving up big play after big play. Parcells is considering the idea of converting to a 3-4, and some believe wholesale changes at LB could be made. I believe that's unlikely, as they neither have the personnel or the coaching expertise (Mike Zimmer - D Coordinator) to convert to a 3-4. They have small DE's or players that would fill the DE role in a 3-4 in Greg Ellis (6'6", 277) and La'Roi Glover (6'2", 285) and small starting outside LBs from last year in Al Singleton and Dexter Coakley. Zimmer has always built his defenses in little D on speed. They do have two young prospective LBs that fit the 3-4 mold in Kalen Thornton and Bradie James. We're told to expect more two-gap formations, but a full time switch appears unlikely.
We're? Um... You mean you're a Cowboy fan...? Is that who you're referring to as "we're"?

:lol:


blasphamy! :twisted:

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:45 pm
by Texas Hog
Jake wrote:
Texas Hog wrote:On offense, fans are dying to hear how the QB situation is going to be addressed.


Cowboys QB roster unlikely to change for '05


I hope Lenna Pspaghetti is right and the pukes spend years trying to develop Henson, who turns out to be a bust. :twisted:

Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 4:43 pm
by Smithian
Check my sig...

Wonder where Gambit is today.

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:58 pm
by tcwest10
I guess Welch, Ant and me can cover the Gnats and Jets.

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:10 am
by Warmother
The Baltimore Ravens fans and pundits have been talking about the need for a WR, OL and DL help.

Some have said to draft a WR with there 1st round pick but it seems that signing a veteren #1 wideout FA, or trading for one. There has been a lot of talk about trading for Randy Moss, with the Ravens giving up there first round pick and some defensive help to the Vikings. Some of the FA's talked about were Armani Toomer, TJ Housmanzadah, and Mushin Muhameed.

The OL and DL help would come from the draft. It seems they might want to change back to a 4-3 defense so big DT would be wanted.

As I here more I'll let you know. I think this thread is a good idea.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:05 am
by Jeremy81
word around san diego is the same pretty much...they need a wr...fast, big, posession, deep threat. doesn't matter...they want to improve at OL too...

oh, and they desperately need a Tight End....kidding

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:38 pm
by Skinsfan55
In Colorado people are calling for a QB that doesn't suck...

Other than that.......... :-\

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 5:33 pm
by C'fieldSkin
In the Carolina's the biggest need is O-line help and another young running back, because there is talk that Deshaun Foster is not the answer because of durability issues. Even if Moose leaves Keary Colbert and Steve Smith will be good at the one and two, but it seems Ricky Proehl is retiring and that leaves a hole for a possesion type reciever. Ever since Wesley Walls left, fans have wanted a big time tight end and that may be a position taken care, all though it isn't a definate need because of adequate play by Mangum.

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:04 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Yea, Id be willing to contribute to the Baltimore news.

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:31 pm
by welch
I guess Welch, Ant and me can cover the Gnats and Jets.


yes, but...

The big news that I see is stadium news.

The Giants are very quiet.

Everyone read Herman Edwards -- and I like the guy a lot, for pure standup guts during the 9/11 afterwmath -- has said that he could control Randy Moss. That's not much of a statement about what the Jets really need...aside from a healthy Wayne Chrebet (concussions) and Chad Pennington (shoulder).

Both teams are angling for new stadiums. For the latest on the Giants, see:

Giants Have Their Own Luxury Box Dreams
in todays NY Times at

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/sport ... ecsey.html

The Times archives and charges for articles more than one week old, so go quick or pay aout $4.00, which seems silly, but I don't own the Times.

For simplicty, here is the article, written by a clearly sceptical George Vecsy:


February 13, 2005
SPORTS OF THE TIMES
Giants Have Their Own Luxury Box Dreams
By GEORGE VECSEY

THE shrimp are merely a symbol, dipped in figurative cocktail sauce.

Likewise, the white wine is merely a gesture, a token of hospitality. Nevertheless, it is preferably served slightly chilled, at halftime of a football game. Or earlier, if the Giants don't have their offense in gear.

Shrimp and white wine in luxury boxes have become my classic examples of all that is wrong with contemporary sports. But John K. Mara, the executive vice president of the Giants, says it's not just about effete refreshments as he explains why the Giants need a new stadium.

And why should the Giants be any different? Just about every pro team in the New York area is having stadium dreams, arena anxieties, particularly the Jets, who are hustling to get steam shovels chugging in Manhattan before the International Olympic Committee makes its decision about 2012 on July 6.

The Giants' desire for a new stadium is not about the Summer Games but rather about autumnal comfort. Mara said the needs for some wealthy fans were prime parking, private suites, television sets for replays, comfortable bathrooms, a warm haven during a cold game, in addition to easy access to club seats - in case anybody wants to get crazy and actually watch the game.

"For a certain element of the fan base, there is a demand for that product," Mara said. "For a team to survive, you have to move in that direction."

Having qualms about public support for new stadiums, I had asked Mara to explain why the Giants were negotiating with the authorities in New Jersey to build their own stadium, one that would cost $700 million and seat 80,000 not far from the current one in the Meadowlands. I was stunned to be told that Giants Stadium was going on 29 years old, after being upgraded in the past decade.

"It is still a good place to see a game," Mara said. "It has good sightlines. But it lacks the amenities."

This family has been in the football business for 80 years. Decades ago, I watched Mara's father, Wellington, who is still the president of the Giants, jogging around the team's practice field in faded blue sweatsuits, or tossing rudimentary game films, wrapped in old sweat socks, down to the coaches. I'm just guessing his children did not fall too far from that rather modest tree.

"We've been pushing for a new stadium for years," John Mara said in a telephone conversation Thursday. "We are in an old building with an unfavorable lease. We are slipping toward the bottom quartile in the league."

"We need to keep up with the Joneses, the Snyders, the Luries," he added, referring to the owners in Dallas, Washington and Philadelphia. "The three teams in our division are all in the top quartile."

The glory of the National Football League is the socialistic policy that has all 32 teams sharing equally from the large network television pot. But even with the Giants' seating capacity listed at 80,242 since the stadium's expansion, the parity is eroding, Mara said, because of unequal stadium leases and unequal facilities. Leases for luxury boxes bring in millions of dollars while snacks yield pennies.

"We don't want to say, 'We can't afford a signing bonus,' " Mara said, referring to that enticement for a free agent who might upgrade the team. So a new stadium would pay for last season's prize rookie, Eli Manning? "It will pay for his next contract," Mara said.

"Right now we have 112 boxes," Mara added, "but we have a three-way split with the Jets and the sports authority. We would contemplate having 200 boxes. Right now, we really don't have club seats. We would like to have between 6,000 and 12,000 club seats with more amenities."

It all gets back to amenities. Not everybody at Giants Stadium is content to fill up on substantial tailgate brunches, but are "amenities" enough reason for knocking down a perfectly good stadium and building a new one?

"To tell you the truth, if it was me going to a game, I'd prefer a hot dog and a pretzel," John Mara said. But the 50-year-old businessman in him sees it differently: "There is a divide in the market."

To build the stadium, with their money, the Giants may have to accept a double traffic jam from a proposed amusement park next door. Getting to Giants Stadium is brutal now because there is no rail service.

Of course, the wisest thing would be for the Jets to conduct their eight-times-a-year business with a new lease across the river from their proposed $1.7 billion West Side railroad-yards-of-dreams.

The Jets are being gang-tackled by public opposition, by wary politicians from each party and by the Dolans from Madison Square Garden, whose offer to build housing on the West Side just might be pure mischief.

Mara said he was not waiting for the Jets.

He wants a new stadium as soon as 2008. Shrimp and white wine to follow.


Speaking as a very recent New Jersey citizen, and an current New York citizen, it all looks like a Giant rip off of public money at Jet-like speed, money of which we don't have too much in either state.

[Note: I have a terrific migraine today, and the medication makes my sloppy typing even worse than usual. Apologies to all.]

**

All this football stadium envy in the NY areas follows the Yankees and Mets deperate attempt to rip off the public for two new stadiums.

Oh, and a slippery attempt to get Nets and Devils stadiums.

**

No, not with my tax money, George Steinbrenner and Mara family. If the Yankees want to move to Nashsville to replace the Nashville Sounds (their AA farm team), let them go. Are there any baseball teams, maybe in Tampa, that would like to share NYC with the Mets?

If the Giants want to move to Sacramento, let them. Might another team that wants to move here? Calling the Raiders?

This edges into another topic.

*

I remember that Mayor Giuiliani had a bug in his ear on September 10, 2002, about (a) pushcart hotdog vendors (horrors: using a $1.50 hot dog to complete with $20 business lunches...unfair!!), the temptation for real New Yorkers to
jaywalk 5th Avenue near Rockefeller Center, and, the biggey: Mayor Rudy's plan to spend $1 billion (yes, that's a 'b') to build new versions of Yankee Stadium and Shea.

*

Yes, the stadium building binge is a separete topic, but that's what I see most in the papers. By the way, there is a link to the new stadiuum in DC, with the difference that the DC deal was done, signed, sealed, and delivered when the City Council tried to renogiate.

By the way, given my choice, RFK is a "good enough" baseball stadium, but the negotiation time is over. Enjoy it this year, Senators (aka Nats) fans. I certainly hope they re-paint the upper-deeck seats when Frank Howard, the immense Hondo, hit his 450 foot (or more) home runs. They used to paint the seats where they landed gold, and hardy anyone but Hondo owned an under-deck seat. But, another topic.

(The migraine medication is begining to make my mide wander...)

[OK, head's better, so I corrected the typing. Stadium issue remains, though.]

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 10:29 pm
by JPFair
Here in Boston, the only thing they're looking for is a Defensive Co-ordinator and an Offensive Co-ordinatore. All there players are locked up, and no ones moaning about wanting more money. The Co-ordinators that they need should be coming from within, so no break of continuity is expected. The Pats will be every bit as good next year!