Page 1 of 2

espn HOF poll

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:52 pm
by Brandon777

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:16 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Done.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:43 pm
by John Manfreda
Done

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:45 pm
by DieselFan
Done...top 5 so far:

85.6% Dan Marino -- QB with Miami Dolphins, 1983-99. Nine-time Pro Bowler, holds numerous NFL passing records.

83.1% Steve Young -- QB mostly with San Francisco 49ers, 1985-99. Seven-time Pro Bowler, MVP of Super Bowl XXIX.

66.9% Derrick Thomas -- LB with K. C. Chiefs, 1989-99. Nine-time Pro Bowler, 126.5 career sacks.

64.6% Art Monk -- WR mostly with Washington Redskins, 1980-95. Three-time Pro Bowler. At one time held both single-season and career receptions record.

54.9% Michael Irvin -- WR with Dallas Cowboys, 1988-99. Five-time Pro Bowler. Tied for 16th in all-time receptions, 11th in all-time yards.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:03 pm
by redskincity
Done Deal.

The Hall of fame is BS. The old timers should be inducted before any newbie. My 2 cents

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:09 pm
by JansenFan
I still think that there are enough current members to allow them to vote for who gets in, instead of the media. There is no way that the national media can rate every player from every era.

If the members were responsible for voting, players who played with the candidates, either on the same team or against them would have a better idea of what type of player they are looking for.

The HOF and the Pro Bowl have become jokes, and if I were in either, I would feel cheated by what it has become.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:24 pm
by washington53
done

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:31 pm
by Wysocki
Done...I also voted for Marino and Thomas...

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:04 pm
by tcwest10
JansenFan wrote:The HOF and the Pro Bowl have become jokes, and if I were in either, I would feel cheated by what it has become.


The same can be said for every HOF in every sport. I think it's more the selection process that bothers you, rather than the institution itself. I would think that, to be enshrined among the very best ever to play your sport would be the greatest honor an athlete could hope for.
That's why I want it so badly for Monk. He deserves it, even if he doesn't think so himself.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:06 pm
by NC43Hog
Done,

And I voted for Fritz Pollard, along with Monk and Grimm.

Don't forget the players you laid the groundwork.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:09 pm
by JansenFan
tcwest10 wrote:
JansenFan wrote:The HOF and the Pro Bowl have become jokes, and if I were in either, I would feel cheated by what it has become.


The same can be said for every HOF in every sport. I think it's more the selection process that bothers you, rather than the institution itself. I would think that, to be enshrined among the very best ever to play your sport would be the greatest honor an athlete could hope for.
That's why I want it so badly for Monk. He deserves it, even if he doesn't think so himself.


Yeah, that's what I was implying...the selection process has made a mockery of what these institutions actually were created for.

The HOF was created to honor the best players, not the players the media likes. The Pro Bowl used to shocase the best players, now it is a place where the same people go no matter how they actually play.

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:43 pm
by redskindave
Done, Im praying Art Monk makes it [-o<

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:57 pm
by 1niksder
done 65.2% Art Monk

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:46 pm
by Justice Hog
Done.

Latest numbers:

85.7% - D. Marino
82.7% - S. Young
66.8% - D. Thomas
65.2% - A. Monk
54.1% - M. Irvin
36.3% - R. Dent
32.4% - H. Carson
29.0% - L.C. Greenwood
14.7% - R. Grimm
13.8% - B. Friedman
12.5% - G. Young
9.5% - B. Kuechenberg
6.6% - R. Wehrli
4.0% - C. Humphrey

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:27 pm
by rick301
Done. Currently Monk is at #4 but Grimm is at #9. If this pattern keeps up, Monk will be in but Grimm may have to wait until next year.

1. 85.7% Dan Marino

2. 82.6% Steve Young

3. 66.8% Derrick Thomas

4. 65.3% Art Monk

5. 54.1% Michael Irvin

6. 36.3% Richard Dent

7. 32.4% Harry Carson

8. 29.0% L.C. Greenwood

9. 14.8% Russ Grimm

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:40 pm
by skinpride1
\:D/ I just voted and the results so far are Monk 65.5% and Irvan 53.7%I think these fans know who the real talent was!!!

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:58 am
by SkinsLaVa®
Done, vote for Monk n Grimm. Why vote for any1 more, doesn't that lessen the chances of putting Monk in?

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:02 am
by hailskins666
SkinsLaVa® wrote:Done, vote for Monk n Grimm. Why vote for any1 more, doesn't that lessen the chances of putting Monk in?
no. because our votes don't count. just those morons like peter queen and mrs z from espn. :puke:

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:11 am
by 1niksder
Great poll ESPN is running enjoyed it so much I voted for Monk...........again

85.5% Dan Marino
82.2% Steve Young
66.6% Derrick Thomas
65.6% Art Monk
53.6% Michael Irvin
36.0% Richard Dent
32.2% Harry Carson
28.9% L.C. Greenwood
15.4% Russ Grimm
13.9% Benny Friedman
12.4% Fritz Pollard
12.4% George Young
9.4% Bob Kuechenberg
6.5% Roger Wehrli
4.0% Claude Humphrey

Total Votes: 5,692

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:18 am
by oafusp
Voted for Monk, Grimm, Marino, Young, and Thomas.

If Monk makes it I will book my hotel room in Canton for this summer!!!

"It's legalized theft, a crime, that Art Monk is not in the Hall of Fame. Those voters ought to be absolutely ashamed of themselves.''

-- ESPN football analyst Sean Salisbury.

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:10 am
by Warmother
Done

Oafusp I voted exactly like you.

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:20 pm
by Texas Hog
hailskins666 wrote:
SkinsLaVa® wrote:Done, vote for Monk n Grimm. Why vote for any1 more, doesn't that lessen the chances of putting Monk in?
no. because our votes don't count. just those morons like peter queen and mrs z from espn. :puke:


This is a damn shame. It's like letting the media vote for President.

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 2:39 pm
by DieselFan
Texas Hog wrote:
hailskins666 wrote:
SkinsLaVa® wrote:Done, vote for Monk n Grimm. Why vote for any1 more, doesn't that lessen the chances of putting Monk in?
no. because our votes don't count. just those morons like peter queen and mrs z from espn. :puke:


This is a damn shame. It's like letting the media vote for President.


Great point...if that were to happen...our last 5 presidents would have been Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, Gore, and Howard Dean....YIKES!!!!!!!!...or should I say "YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHH!"

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:08 am
by tcwest10
Thomas is a choice because he's dead, in my opinion.

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:34 am
by C'fieldSkin
Done.