Once again, Dr. Z disses Monk
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:32 am
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/w ... index.html
At least he's anti-Irvin (to a lesser extent) as well.
At least he's anti-Irvin (to a lesser extent) as well.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Redskin in Canada wrote:Why on earth every time that the Hall of Fame process advances one step, Dr. Z column is quoted in a thread here???![]()
tcwest10, I really like your postings and your avatar is great but COME ON!!! Why do you go back to quote this idiot???![]()
I thought there was an obvious sense of humour in my post but it is now apparent that it was misunderstood. My mistake. I thought that two fans of the same player trying to support his arrival to the Hall of Fame can have some sense of humour and a common dislike for that writer.tcwest10 wrote:You know, RiC...I really don't need to run my topics past you before I post them.
welch wrote:Here's hoping that no one is persuaded by Dr Z.
Didn't he pick the Bills over the Redskins in SB 26 (answer: yes. Smart guy).
By the way, Jeff Bostic ought to be there with Grimm and Big Joe. Joe Gibbs won three Super Bowls with three different QB's and three different RB's...but one center.
Linemen aren't considered "skill position" players, and are often overlooked. The argument could be made for that entire line, as a whole, to inducted as one.
welch wrote:And for the record, Art Monk deserves the HOF because he: ...