Page 1 of 1

Slowly but surely, team is on the rise

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:27 am
by 1niksder
Slowly but surely, team is on the rise
By Dan Daly


SAN FRANCISCO.
The Redskins are nowhere near as bad as the 49ers, and they needed to make that abundantly clear yesterday. No playing to the level of the competition -- or, perish the thought, actually losing.

They're building for next year now, and it's important they come out of these last few games feeling good about themselves ... or at least less suicidal. It also would be nice to show the world that the near miss against the Eagles was no aberration, that they really are Getting There.

The world has seen a lot of the Redskins this season, probably too much. They've had a Monday night game, two Sunday nighters, yesterday's Saturday date and a bunch of other 4 o'clock starts -- all because of the hoopla surrounding Joe Gibbs' return to the sideline. (What, you thought it was because of their 12-20 record the last two years?)

The Redskins have been perhaps the most visible not so good team in NFL history, and their myriad problems, principally on offense, have been there for all to see.

But now TV viewers are starting to see something else: A club that's slowly moving up in the NFC pecking order, a club that's no longer one of the dregs of the NFC. In the last four weeks, the Redskins have played the Steelers close, blown out the Giants, pushed the Eagles to the limit and, yesterday at Monster Park, clocked the Niners 26-16. That's a month of good, solid football -- which is rarer in the NFL than you might think. It's certainly been rare for the Redskins in recent seasons.

The win over woeful San Francisco was accomplished by the usual means -- a heavy dose of Gregg Williams' defense and just enough of Gibbs' stuck-in-second-gear offense to generate the necessary points. (And had Shawn Springs not been scratched with acute cobwebs after suffering a concussion last week, the margin likely would have been greater.)

But that's just bookkeeping. What was noteworthy about the game -- from the Washington standpoint, at least -- was this:
The Redskins' best run was by a defender, linebacker Antonio Pierce, who returned an interception 78 yards for a touchdown late in the first half to break things open.

The Redskins' best catch also was by a defender, end Ron Warner, who dropped into coverage, picked off a wobbly Ken Dorsey pass and rumbled/stumbled/bumbled 39 yards to set up a field goal.

And the Redskins' best block was by a defender, too, linebacker Chris Clemons, who waylaid Dorsey to help clear the way for Pierce on his INT/TD.

With a defense like that, who needs an offense?
"If you look at the stat sheet," Fred Smoot said, "you'll see that [the tackles, sacks, interceptions, etc., are] all spread out. There's no one dominant guy. That's what makes this group special, man. Somebody goes down, somebody else steps in."

True enough, though I'm not sure anyone expected the 6-foot-3, 270-pound Warner to pick up the slack for the 6-0, 200-pound Springs -- Warner least of all. "My first pick since high school," he said with a mixture of pride and disbelief.

It couldn't have come at a better time either because while Patrick Ramsey and Co. were able to move the ball on the Niners, they had all kinds of trouble near the goal line. A first-and-goal at the San Francisco 3 produced only a 25-yard field goal. A second-and-goal at the San Francisco 3 led to just a 21-yard field goal. And the Redskins' longest drive of the day, a 78-yarder that reached the San Francisco 2, yielded merely a 25-yard field goal.
This against a 2-12 team with nothing to play for -- except the first pick in the draft.

"Not to rain on our parade," said Ramsey, "but we've got to stick the ball in the end zone when we get down there. We're playing some of the better teams in the league [these next two weeks], and it's something we've got to focus on and get done."

Actually, there's no parade to rain on. It has been a season of struggle for the Redskins offense, from first to last, and that doesn't figure to change in the last two games against the Cowboys and Vikings. But there are some hopeful signs for the future, "things we can count on," as Gibbs said. Like Clinton Portis' willingness to run until his tongue hangs out. Like Ramsey's growing ability to avoid the Big Mistake -- and to convert third downs by fitting the ball into tight places. Like Laveranues Coles' heart.

At the end of last season, it was all coming apart for the Redskins. They were in the process of losing 11 of their final 13 games. Indeed, they were the kind of like the 49ers are now. But things are starting to come together for them, albeit slowly. And if these next two games are anything like the last four, it won't be nearly so cold a winter.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/function ... 4027-1086r

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:16 pm
by DESkins
"Not to rain on our parade," said Ramsey, "but we've got to stick the ball in the end zone when we get down there. We're playing some of the better teams in the league [these next two weeks], and it's something we've got to focus on and get done."

Sounds like Ramsey is being realistic in assessing the performance of the offense. Now, let's hope that they get it done in the next two games.

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:26 pm
by RedskinsRule56
I would sure hope that article says we are no where near as bad as the Niners they are clearly the worst team in the league! COME ON!

Posted: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:30 pm
by DESkins
I think the article was pointing out similarities between the Redskins of last season and the 9'ers this season, but acknowledging that the the 'Skins still have a ways to go on offense, which should not come as any great surprise. But the first paragraph says that the Redskins are not nearly as bad as the 9'ers.

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:38 am
by Rypien11
What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:34 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.


Huh? I thought we WON game 1, with Marky mark under center. I think, had we executed better as a team, we'd be rightfully in the thick of things. Keep in mind, we're still in the playoff hunt, though some might think undeservedly so.

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:51 pm
by Cooley47
If Pat had started from Day one we would have beaten the Cowboys, Giants and the Browns at least

We would be in the playoffs

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:53 am
by REDEEMEDSKIN
CORRECTION: We MAY have won against those teams. Let's not forget Pat's poor performances during pre-season, which, more than likely, he would have brought into the regular season from Day 1.

He looks like he's improved quite a bit since then, but he is nowhere near a consistent level, yet. Perhaps a little playoff run will light a spark under him and help him reach his potential.

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:27 pm
by Deadskins
Yes, we may have lost a few early games, but Patrick would be that much better for it now. It wasn't like Brunell had an awesome pre-season.

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:37 pm
by Wysocki
Rypien11 wrote:What if Ramsey had started game one? Maybe worth another win or 2 this season, which in the 2004 NFC is right in the thick of the playoffs.

Maybe not, IMHO...At the start of the season Patrick was still recovering from surgery, was gun-shy, and didn't have a grasp of Joe's offense. Apparently nobody knew the offense, as the whole package is finally coming together now; had Patrick started the season he would have been blamed for the ineptitude and who knows where he would be as he lost what little bit of confidence he had...I'm more comfortable watching Ramsey now (I'm down to only 2 or 3 "throw the ball!" each game) and hope it continues this week in that friggin hole-in-the-roof-where-the-sun-shines-on-one-part-of-the-field stadium...

Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2004 6:46 pm
by hailskins666
friggin hole-in-the-roof-where-the-sun-shines-on-one-part-of-the-field stadium...
ROTFALMAO

Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 6:27 pm
by welch
I'm glad that the team looks better and better now. That was my hope for the season.

There is no telling what would have happened if Ramsey had started the season, but an offense requires a lot of practice under fire, coordination. We saw that:

- the whole offense was very ragged at first

- the OL has gotten better, but still is not finished. No Jansen, Raymer says that he needs to work hard on weights to be stronger for next year...

- no evidence from last year, from pre-season, or from the Giants game that Ramsey understood how to run the team. He has been learning, getting better and better

I just want them to beat the Cowboys. That amounts to a playoff game.

Posted: Sun Dec 26, 2004 12:13 am
by Texas Hog
Patrick can buy my loyalty with a good performance tomorrow against the pukes.

Let's face it, tomorrow is the biggest game we've had in years. If PRam chokes and plays poorly, I for one won't be sold on our future at QB....I doubt many will.

That said....go Patrick! Show us what your made of and make some plays.