The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

DT11 twisted somnething there. Another chance for MK12 now.

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

SlkyCaramel wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

SlkyCaramel wrote:Here we go, the defense does it again.....they always give at the end.

Oh another retarded comment about the defense.

Why does it matter if our defense sucks when we can't score enough point to even use our defense?

Because this is a team game, contrary to popular belief. Just because the offense does not play well, the defense does not get a pass from me to play terribly.

JC sure has one hopped some tonight, huh?

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

I'm thinking 8-8.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Isn't that where all of the "experts" predicted we would finish?

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Maybe Chris is getting soft? C'mon, CLL! Man up!

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

SF just beat NYJ

I think we can beat them, but 9-7 isn't getting us anywhere

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

SF is no longer a given.

jason campbell false start...great leader

i don't think I have ever seen a false start penalty on a qb

Countertrey wrote:

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Maybe Chris is getting soft? C'mon, CLL! Man up!

Yeah, I think we're going to win all the rest of our games and stroll into the playoffs. Yeah.

Does that make yall feel better?

Everyone can go to bed now. Ed Reed got it started and he now put the final touch on it.

PATHETIC......WE SUCK

Come on ey, fight for that ball.

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Think we can put up more than 10 points against them?

wouldn't that be a fumble recovery? Ed Reed wasn't downed by a skin and randle el grabbed the ball.

The Skins remind me of the Lions last season.

We are now officially in free fall.

Sir_Monk wrote:The Skins remind me of the Lions last season.

that's actually a good assessment.

spudstr04 wrote:wouldn't that be a fumble recovery? Ed Reed wasn't downed by a skin and randle el grabbed the ball.

yeah, what is the rule there??

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

VetSkinsFan wrote:

Chris Luva Luva wrote:

Sir_Monk wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:I am not saying that I support it, b/c I don't, but do you think this collapse could mean the dumping of Zorn for Cowher?

If the Skins were 7-6, but playing better, no, but the way we are playing I do.

We're going to finish below .500.

Think we can't beat Cin and SF?

Think we can put up more than 10 points against them?

I think we can beat 1 of 'em. 1/3 gives us .500, which is still acceptable for a 1st year yead coach IMO.

If Portis is healthy, the offense looks a whoe lot better

Can someone explain why that wasn't considered a fumble by Reed? He was not down by contact. The only player who can give himself up by sliding is the QB. When he slid, and held the ball up, that should have still been a live play until he was touched by a Redskin. Randal El plucked the ball from his hand. Why was that not a change of possession?