Page 4 of 7
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:06 pm
by owa
You mean the sidelines?
I'm glad we picked up Tupa. He has been a godsend.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:12 pm
by welch
The Bears fail again. How about the Redskin's defense? How long can they hold on by themselves? Grrrr.
This has to be a sustained drive.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:18 pm
by owa
Man, Bugel needs to do something. This is getting ridiculous.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:19 pm
by Amberion
we are punting again
Guess its better than a turnover
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:19 pm
by skinz74
Brunell is ineffective at BEST
OL
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:20 pm
by Redskin in Canada
The OLis not holding together at all.
Our offensive scheme relies on a good OL, which we do not have.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:21 pm
by skinz74
All it's gonna take is ONE good drive and we can lose this one...I'm gonna be sick. Our defense can only do so much
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:21 pm
by welch
Man, Bugel needs to do something. This is getting ridiculous.
Bears announcers make the point that Raymer was crushed last week, same this week. R Thomas shaky. "Without Jansen, they [OL] are average".
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:22 pm
by skinz74
The same thing that happened last week is happening again...and to a lesser back...
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:23 pm
by skinz74
Way to redeem yourself Sean..!!!
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm
by 1niksder
skinz74 wrote:Way to redeem yourself Sean..!!!
Only sack of the game so far
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm
by owa
It does look like more of the same ol' same ol'. A TD by either team probably wins the game the way things are going.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm
by Champsturf
Our offense needs to take some pressure off te D and score for a change. Nice run PORTIS!!
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:29 pm
by owa
Wish we would try that quick pitch that we tried once earlier in the game. That seemed to work well.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:30 pm
by owa
Heh, speak of the devil.

I guess he has been saving it for the right situation.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:31 pm
by Irn-Bru
Come on, Redskins! We've really gotta finish on this drive to make sure we've got a handle on the game.
Portis has been playing very well from what I can hear / read about. Sounds to me like the offensive system is just that much closer to clicking.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:31 pm
by Redskin in Canada
We need a TD a FG will not do!
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm
by SkinsLaVar
Brunell just made a desperate run , diving out of bounds as soon as he saw Urlacher charging at him. Ahaha, that was too funny. It was a nice play though.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm
by 4bz
i guess a field goal will do
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm
by Champsturf
WHY can't we put the ball in the ENDZONE?!?!
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm
by Irn-Bru
Well, I guess we'll just have to settle for 3. If our D can just get another 3 and out, then maybe our offense can grind out more yards and eat some major clock time. This could turn into a solid win for Gibbs, and give us some great confidence going into the bye week.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm
by Amberion
I'm thinking that Brunell running is better than Brunell trying to throw
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm
by Scottskins
yeah, then on 3rd he runs out of bounds instead of going for the 1st down. All right!!!! 6 point lead....
brunell is getting older by the minute.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:35 pm
by owa
FanfromAnnapolis wrote:Come on, Redskins! We've really gotta finish on this drive to make sure we've got a handle on the game.
Portis has been playing very well from what I can hear / read about. Sounds to me like the offensive system is just that much closer to clicking.
We're running well but not as well as the statistics would indicate. Portis is getting big chunks at a time when there is a hole but we're also getting stuffed for no gain a lot. We're not dominating enough to run it down their throat just yet b/c we seem to struggle with the short yardage stuff still. The outside stuff is working well and when Portis cuts back it works well.
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:35 pm
by welch
"9 play 73 yard drive"
Not a TD, which would have finished the Bears, but 3 more points.