The official Redskins/Bears thread

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:06 pm

You mean the sidelines?

I'm glad we picked up Tupa. He has been a godsend.

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:12 pm

The Bears fail again. How about the Redskin's defense? How long can they hold on by themselves? Grrrr.

This has to be a sustained drive.

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:18 pm

Man, Bugel needs to do something. This is getting ridiculous.

Amberion · Post by **Amberion** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:19 pm

we are punting again

Guess its better than a turnover

skinz74 · Post by **skinz74** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:19 pm

Brunell is ineffective at BEST

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:20 pm

The OLis not holding together at all.

Our offensive scheme relies on a good OL, which we do not have.

skinz74 · Post by **skinz74** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:21 pm

All it's gonna take is ONE good drive and we can lose this one...I'm gonna be sick. Our defense can only do so much

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:21 pm

Man, Bugel needs to do something. This is getting ridiculous.

Bears announcers make the point that Raymer was crushed last week, same this week. R Thomas shaky. "Without Jansen, they [OL] are average".

skinz74 · Post by **skinz74** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:22 pm

The same thing that happened last week is happening again...and to a lesser back...

skinz74 · Post by **skinz74** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:23 pm

Way to redeem yourself Sean..!!!

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm

skinz74 wrote:Way to redeem yourself Sean..!!!

Only sack of the game so far

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm

It does look like more of the same ol' same ol'. A TD by either team probably wins the game the way things are going.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:27 pm

Our offense needs to take some pressure off te D and score for a change. Nice run PORTIS!!

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:29 pm

Wish we would try that quick pitch that we tried once earlier in the game. That seemed to work well.

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:30 pm

Heh, speak of the devil.

I guess he has been saving it for the right situation.

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:31 pm

Come on, Redskins! We've really gotta finish on this drive to make sure we've got a handle on the game.

Portis has been playing very well from what I can hear / read about. Sounds to me like the offensive system is just that much closer to clicking.

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:31 pm

We need a TD a FG will not do!

SkinsLaVar · Post by **SkinsLaVar** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm

Brunell just made a desperate run , diving out of bounds as soon as he saw Urlacher charging at him. Ahaha, that was too funny. It was a nice play though.

4bz · Post by **4bz** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm

i guess a field goal will do

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:33 pm

WHY can't we put the ball in the ENDZONE?!?!

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm

Well, I guess we'll just have to settle for 3. If our D can just get another 3 and out, then maybe our offense can grind out more yards and eat some major clock time. This could turn into a solid win for Gibbs, and give us some great confidence going into the bye week.

Amberion · Post by **Amberion** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm

I'm thinking that Brunell running is better than Brunell trying to throw

Scottskins · Post by **Scottskins** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:34 pm

yeah, then on 3rd he runs out of bounds instead of going for the 1st down. All right!!!! 6 point lead....

brunell is getting older by the minute.

owa · Post by **owa** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:35 pm

FanfromAnnapolis wrote:Come on, Redskins! We've really gotta finish on this drive to make sure we've got a handle on the game.

Portis has been playing very well from what I can hear / read about. Sounds to me like the offensive system is just that much closer to clicking.

We're running well but not as well as the statistics would indicate. Portis is getting big chunks at a time when there is a hole but we're also getting stuffed for no gain a lot. We're not dominating enough to run it down their throat just yet b/c we seem to struggle with the short yardage stuff still. The outside stuff is working well and when Portis cuts back it works well.

welch · Post by **welch** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:35 pm

"9 play 73 yard drive"

Not a TD, which would have finished the Bears, but 3 more points.