Re: Matt Jones - RB
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 9:59 am
Well, we didn't draft a RB in the first three rounds, and didn't sign a running back in FA yet. Not too surprising that Matt Jones is looking like an every down back now. 

Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
riggofan wrote:Well, we didn't draft a RB in the first three rounds, and didn't sign a running back in FA yet. Not too surprising that Matt Jones is looking like an every down back now.
riggofan wrote:hah. My point exactly. And I know why you're calling the kid from Tulane to make the roster!
I actually think Jones will be fine in his second year. I'm more concerned about whether he can go the entire year and stay healthy as the primary guy. Hopefully McCloughan found one of this under the radar guys in Keith Marshall.
Deadskins wrote:riggofan wrote:hah. My point exactly. And I know why you're calling the kid from Tulane to make the roster!
I actually think Jones will be fine in his second year. I'm more concerned about whether he can go the entire year and stay healthy as the primary guy. Hopefully McCloughan found one of this under the radar guys in Keith Marshall.
I think Marshall will be used as more of a change-of-pace 3rd down back.
riggofan wrote:Deadskins wrote:riggofan wrote:hah. My point exactly. And I know why you're calling the kid from Tulane to make the roster!
I actually think Jones will be fine in his second year. I'm more concerned about whether he can go the entire year and stay healthy as the primary guy. Hopefully McCloughan found one of this under the radar guys in Keith Marshall.
I think Marshall will be used as more of a change-of-pace 3rd down back.
Isn't that Chris Thompson's job?
I know Marshall is fast but he's also 5'11" 220 lbs vs. Thompson's 5'8" 203 lbs. Marshall seems to compare more to Alfred Morris physically.
riggofan wrote:I pretty much agree with what you're saying. You can't really say though that no rookie can be expected to be the fallback option. Jones was just that last year. And of course Alf Morris went right to the head of the line as a rookie.
Its possible we could see Jones, Marshall as his backup, and Thompson as the third down, change of pace guy. But seems like that scenario would be making big assumptions about Marshall. I expect to see Pierre Thomas back at some point too.
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:riggofan wrote:I pretty much agree with what you're saying. You can't really say though that no rookie can be expected to be the fallback option. Jones was just that last year. And of course Alf Morris went right to the head of the line as a rookie.
Its possible we could see Jones, Marshall as his backup, and Thompson as the third down, change of pace guy. But seems like that scenario would be making big assumptions about Marshall. I expect to see Pierre Thomas back at some point too.
The situations were a bit different. Morris was a proven starter and Jones was a 3rd round pick. Now Jones is a 3rd round starter who has never carried the ball more than 19 times in a single game. He's backed up by a situational back who has never carried the ball more than 7 times in a game. And ostensibly two rookies who have never taken a meaningful NFL snap. I can't read minds but it seems unfathomable McCloughan and Gruden are comfortable with the running back situation.
DEHog wrote:^^ Agreed lots of FA RB's out there...
Arian Foster
Joique Bell
Toby Gerhart
Reggie Bush
Anthony Dixon
Chris Polk
Bernard Pierce
Fred Jackson
Ahmad Bradshaw
Cierre Wood
Dan Herron
Pierre Thomas
Bryce Brown
Kendall Hunter
Terrence Magee
Steven Jackson
Ross Scheuerman
Ben Malena
Marion Grice
Robert Hughes
Cameron Marshall
Christian Powell
Michael Hill
Vick Ballard
Kevin Monangai
RigAr4456 wrote:I am new to this board and don't know how to properly quote from another's post, and so as I agree with B&G that Chris Thompson doesn't offer a lot to the Redskins when it comes to productive carries, we should all remember that he is a very good to excellent blocker in picking up the blitz. He isn't as aggressive and violent of a blocker as Portis was but he is still very good.
stuff i might paste in here
DarthMonk wrote:RigAr4456 wrote:I am new to this board and don't know how to properly quote from another's post, and so as I agree with B&G that Chris Thompson doesn't offer a lot to the Redskins when it comes to productive carries, we should all remember that he is a very good to excellent blocker in picking up the blitz. He isn't as aggressive and violent of a blocker as Portis was but he is still very good.
If you see a post you want to quote then hit the quote button above and to the right of the post and the text of the post will appear between the quote and unquote.
You can also cut and paste sections of a post and enclose what you want to quote between the quote and unquote.
If you click the Quote tab when you are about to compose the quote and unquote appear with a cursor blinking between them.
Then you can paste stuff in there.
You can also type the quote and unquote commands.
For example, I am about to click the Quote tab. Here it goes.stuff i might paste in here
After you finish reading this, hit the quote button above and to the right of this post then look at the gray screen. You'll see how it works.
DarthMonk wrote:RigAr4456 wrote:I am new to this board and don't know how to properly quote from another's post, and so as I agree with B&G that Chris Thompson doesn't offer a lot to the Redskins when it comes to productive carries, we should all remember that he is a very good to excellent blocker in picking up the blitz. He isn't as aggressive and violent of a blocker as Portis was but he is still very good.
If you see a post you want to quote then hit the quote button above and to the right of the post and the text of the post will appear between the quote and unquote.
You can also cut and paste sections of a post and enclose what you want to quote between the quote and unquote.
If you click the Quote tab when you are about to compose the quote and unquote appear with a cursor blinking between them.
Then you can paste stuff in there.
You can also type the quote and unquote commands.
For example, I am about to click the Quote tab. Here it goes.stuff i might paste in here
After you finish reading this, hit the quote button above and to the right of this post then look at the gray screen. You'll see how it works.
No need to paste.
riggofan wrote:Deadskins wrote:riggofan wrote:hah. My point exactly. And I know why you're calling the kid from Tulane to make the roster!
I actually think Jones will be fine in his second year. I'm more concerned about whether he can go the entire year and stay healthy as the primary guy. Hopefully McCloughan found one of this under the radar guys in Keith Marshall.
I think Marshall will be used as more of a change-of-pace 3rd down back.
Isn't that Chris Thompson's job?
I know Marshall is fast but he's also 5'11" 220 lbs vs. Thompson's 5'8" 203 lbs. Marshall seems to compare more to Alfred Morris physically.
Countertrey wrote:Does anyone have a handle on Marshall's receiving skills? Obviously, with his speed and size (I have also seen some elusiveness in video) they will try to manufacture ways to get the ball to him in the open field...
Matt Jones is practicing with a football which emits a warning signal if he does not apply pressure to every key point.
After Jones fumbled five times in just 163 touches last year, the Redskins are pulling out all the stops to improve his ball security. "We’ve got all kinds of things that help him out," coach Jay Gruden said, "mainly focus on the ball not just when he’s in contact or in the line of scrimmage, but outside of contact where he had a lot of trouble last year."
Jones is expected to carry the load for Washington, but he will have to protect the ball better to retain the workhorse role. Jones is shaping up as a risk/reward RB2.
Source: CSN Mid-Atlantic Jun 7 - 9:20 AM