Page 4 of 4

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:22 pm
by grampi
SkinsJock wrote:THANKFULLY - I don't think that many Redskin, players, coaches or fans think that Kirk Cousins gives the team a better chance at success :lol:


He gives the team a better chance to win than does the current version of RG3....

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 4:06 pm
by riggofan
grampi wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:THANKFULLY - I don't think that many Redskin, players, coaches or fans think that Kirk Cousins gives the team a better chance at success :lol:


He gives the team a better chance to win than does the current version of RG3....


Thanks. I just threw up on my shirt.

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 5:59 pm
by StorminMormon86
I would love to see Cousins come in and play a game just to see if there really is that much difference. Never going to happen though.

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:09 pm
by HEROHAMO
StorminMormon86 wrote:I would love to see Cousins come in and play a game just to see if there really is that much difference. Never going to happen though.


While I do think Cousins would score points. Whats the difference if our defense is giving up massive yardage?

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 8:14 am
by Chris Luva Luva
HEROHAMO wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:I would love to see Cousins come in and play a game just to see if there really is that much difference. Never going to happen though.


While I do think Cousins would score points. Whats the difference if our defense is giving up massive yardage?



The defense is a big issue, but they can't give up massive yardage if the offense is on the field for sustained drives... This defense gave up massive yardage last year but created a lot of turnovers. This year, the turnovers aren't happening.

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:45 am
by StorminMormon86
HEROHAMO wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:I would love to see Cousins come in and play a game just to see if there really is that much difference. Never going to happen though.


While I do think Cousins would score points. Whats the difference if our defense is giving up massive yardage?

Just to see if there's that much of a difference between the offense ran by RG3 now and Cousins. Sadly, the only way we'll be able to win games is if we put up a ton of points.

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:38 pm
by riggofan
RGIII is either our franchise QB or he isn't. We gave up three number one picks for him, because we believed he's the franchise QB we've been looking for. You don't bench him for Kirk Cousins.

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:26 pm
by StorminMormon86
riggofan wrote:RGIII is either our franchise QB or he isn't. We gave up three number one picks for him, because we believed he's the franchise QB we've been looking for. You don't bench him for Kirk Cousins.

No way does he get benched for poor play. Health reasons maybe, but I just don't see it happening.

Posted: Wed Sep 25, 2013 5:04 pm
by SkinsJock
grampi wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:THANKFULLY - I don't think that many Redskin, players, coaches or fans think that Kirk Cousins gives the team a better chance at success :lol:

He gives the team a better chance to win than does the current version of RG3....


given that RG3 is not playing very well but he IS improving with each game - are you suggesting ...

that the team should change QB

or

that the team would score more points if RG3 were not the QB

or

even though RG3 IS improving with each day of practice and each game, this team should 'try' Cousins for the next game

or .... :twisted:

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:45 am
by StorminMormon86
Let's put Cousins in for a series and if he doesn't score, switch to Grossman, then White, then back to RG3. Makes sense to me.

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:12 am
by emoses14
StorminMormon86 wrote:Let's put Cousins in for a series and if he doesn't score, switch to Grossman, then White, then back to RG3. Makes sense to me.


Steve Spurrier, is that you?

Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 3:56 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
At least our D didn't give up 40 points like the awesome Chicago's D....