Page 4 of 17
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:48 pm
by tribeofjudah
The Godless are welcomed in this country as well as the God Honoring.
That's what makes this country great. Freedom to worship or not worship a God.
I didn't create their platform....they did.
And let's face it, this country was founded on Faith by many God honoring men of yesteryear.
I do see a move by some to slowly omit and delete God from the conversation. Ok, that is each person's prerogative.
But I submit this to you (Believers)
Mat 10:33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:30 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
But this Mat guy was a MAN...
More in the atheist thread- not that anyone there is but to keep topics on topic, which this is not nor has been.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:48 am
by tribeofjudah
cowboykillerzRED wrote:But this Mat guy was a MAN...
More in the atheist thread- not that anyone there is but to keep topics on topic, which this is not nor has been.
Matthew, as all other men of God were INSPIRED by the Holy Spirit and wrote (Bible, Scripture, word of God) as they were inspired by the Spirit of God.
This is for Believers, of course.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:08 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Inspired or possessed? Whose to know? Why can't all GOOD people go to heaven? Sounds like some bitter old men, that said our way or burn in flames wrote a lot of the great book.
I haven't pronounced my affiliation to any side of religion or election... Fyi. Also being a believer does NOT = blindly following twit Romney into the gates of hell. As a "believer" of Jesus Christ, you should know: stepping on the poor "little" people is far from holy. Mr Romney hasn't "suffered" a DAY in "middle class". Not that that matters but if u can't relate to those who aren't.millionaires, then you can't relate to the MAJORITY. Tax him and all his friends!

Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:17 am
by tribeofjudah
The Holy Roman Empire has done its fair share of atrocities to humanity in the name of Religion. They too evoke the name of God and Jesus.
Yup, not everyone who calls on God/Jesus........is a friend of God.
Mat 7:21 ¶ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
God knows us by our "fruits"...words and actions that is produces by our Faith in the Goodness of God.
Some Dems want God out
Some Reps are over the top with God
God knows their hearts........
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:19 am
by Irn-Bru
tribeofjudah wrote:The Holy Roman Empire has done its fair share of atrocities to humanity in the name of Religion.
Just curious, which atrocities do you have in mind?
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 11:44 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
tribeofjudah wrote:The Holy Roman Empire has done its fair share of atrocities to humanity in the name of Religion. They too evoke the name of God and Jesus.
Yup, not everyone who calls on God/Jesus........is a friend of God.
Mat 7:21 ¶ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
God knows us by our "fruits"...words and actions that is produces by our Faith in the Goodness of God.
Some Dems want God out
Some Reps are over the top with God
God knows their hearts........
And some AMERICANS want the country ran by the president not the church! Freedom of religion means believe what you want but.let's keep god, ala, Buddha, the pope etc etc out of the office. You can say God bless America cool, but let's not make laws just to please the catholic church. Personal beliefs and citizens RIGHTS in a FREE land shouldnt be to intertwined. People are gay and will be regardless of laws, people have abortions with hangers or throw babies in the trash, my personal feelings don't change any of that.. but we can make things legal just as its legal for anyone to CHOOSE what religion to believe. Just cuz gays have rights, doesn't mean YOU gotta be gay.. just that we all live in the land of the free
Thou shall not judge.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:09 pm
by tribeofjudah
I totally agree with Separation of Church/State....that's a good thing, lest the 2 combined become TOO POWERFUL..........
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:02 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
...as history has shown

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:54 am
by tribeofjudah
cowboykillerzRED wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:The Holy Roman Empire has done its fair share of atrocities to humanity in the name of Religion. They too evoke the name of God and Jesus.
Yup, not everyone who calls on God/Jesus........is a friend of God.
Mat 7:21 ¶ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
God knows us by our "fruits"...words and actions that is produces by our Faith in the Goodness of God.
Some Dems want God out
Some Reps are over the top with God
God knows their hearts........
And some AMERICANS want the country ran by the president not the church! Freedom of religion means believe what you want but.let's keep god, ala, Buddha, the pope etc etc out of the office. You can say God bless America cool, but let's not make laws just to please the catholic church. Personal beliefs and citizens RIGHTS in a FREE land shouldnt be to intertwined. People are gay and will be regardless of laws, people have abortions with hangers or throw babies in the trash, my personal feelings don't change any of that.. but we can make things legal just as its legal for anyone to CHOOSE what religion to believe. Just cuz gays have rights, doesn't mean YOU gotta be gay.. just that we all live in the land of the free
Thou shall not judge.
I agree, we should not judge.....but we can give fair warning as the Bible shows. We have a responsibility to share the Truth and the Word
Here, Ezekiel is given the task of warning Israel.....and it can still apply to this day and age. (don't tell me it was just intended for Israel and no other) Sin is Sin.....any way you cut it.
Eze 3:18 If I warn the wicked, saying, 'You are under the penalty of death,' but you fail to deliver the warning, they will die in their sins. And I will hold you responsible for their deaths.
Eze 3:19 If you warn them and they refuse to repent and keep on sinning, they will die in their sins. But you will have saved yourself because you obeyed me.
Eze 3:20 "If righteous people turn away from their righteous behavior and ignore the obstacles I put in their way, they will die. And if you do not warn them, they will die in their sins. None of their righteous acts will be remembered, and I will hold you responsible for their deaths.
Eze 3:21 But if you warn righteous people not to sin and they listen to you and do not sin, they will live, and you will have saved yourself, too."
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:09 pm
by SkinsJock
I could care less who wins as long as Barney Frank and Nancy (the b*tch) Pelosi get kicked out - who votes for these people

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:29 am
by tribeofjudah
Who here has seen the movie 2016 Obama's America? I have not
Who here has watched this clip? I have
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-HqHSkY ... re=related
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:45 am
by UK Skins Fan
Lol. And the US authorities did nothing to check any of that out? The "establishment" in the US has been completely duped/hoodwinked/deceived by a man who isn't who he says he is, hasn't been where he said he has, and wasn't born in the US, or possibly wasn't even born at all?
I love a good conspiracy

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:01 am
by KazooSkinsFan
UK Skins Fan wrote:The "establishment" in the US has been completely duped/hoodwinked/deceived by a man who isn't who he says he is, hasn't been where he said he has, and wasn't born in the US, or possibly wasn't even born at all?
We still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for us, and that ain't bad
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:38 am
by Deadskins
KazooSkinsFan wrote:We still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for us
That's debatable.

Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 12:24 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
Deadskins wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:We still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for us
That's debatable.

I know, but I had to stick with the quote
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:29 pm
by tribeofjudah
I ask you:
Is this president "asleep at the wheel"...? While the globe is in crisis and unrest in diverse places, he chooses to go on Letterman, Today show, party with Beyonce, etc.... instead of Addressing the nation and the troublemakers.
Is this social engineering of some sort? Is there something more insidious at play here? New World Order? Illuminati?
God Save Us....!!!
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:31 pm
by Deadskins
It's an election year.

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:47 pm
by tribeofjudah
What happens when one is asleep at the wheel...? CRASH AND BURN
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:11 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
tribeofjudah wrote:I ask you:
Is this president "asleep at the wheel"...? While the globe is in crisis and unrest in diverse places, he chooses to go on Letterman, Today show, party with Beyonce, etc.... instead of Addressing the nation and the troublemakers.
Is this social engineering of some sort? Is there something more insidious at play here? New World Order? Illuminati?
God Save Us....!!!
He's not asleep at the wheel. He's just on a mission to transform us into a workers paradise. Can't you tell with all the jobs he's created???
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:20 pm
by tribeofjudah
KazooSkinsFan wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:I ask you:
Is this president "asleep at the wheel"...? While the globe is in crisis and unrest in diverse places, he chooses to go on Letterman, Today show, party with Beyonce, etc.... instead of Addressing the nation and the troublemakers.
Is this social engineering of some sort? Is there something more insidious at play here? New World Order? Illuminati?
God Save Us....!!!
He's not asleep at the wheel. He's just on a mission to transform us into a workers paradise. Can't you tell with all the jobs he's created???
surely you jest....I sense sarcasm
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:49 am
by KazooSkinsFan
tribeofjudah wrote:I sense sarcasm
I hope so...
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:58 pm
by DarthMonk
Obama will win the popular vote roughly 51-48 with 1% going to others.
Obama will win the electoral vote 310-228.
If Bush deserved a 2nd term after starting two wars against the guys who didn't attack then Obama certainly deserves a 2nd term after reversing the direction of the resulting debacle.
Well, maybe he shoulda fixed it all and done it a lot faster.
Do yourself a favor. 2 minutes and 48 seconds. You'll laugh.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qv7k2_lc0M

Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:34 pm
by Countertrey
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:01 am
by DarthMonk
Countertrey wrote:
Good argument ... not.
If it's about jobs:
During Bush's last year in office private sector jobs started disappearing - rapidly. Job losses in the private sector were over 100,000 per month for 2 months. The rate of loss increased to over 200,000 jobs per month for the next 5 months. The loss rate continued to accelerate and was over 400,000 per month for the next 2 months. Job loss rates for the last 3 months of Bush's final year in office were 800,000+, 600,000+, and a final peak of over 900,000 jobs lost in a month - over a million lost in his last 40 days. During this time government jobs held steady as the economy crashed and the average 401K lost 40% of its value.
This is the debacle I mentioned.
Obama took office. The job loss rate in the private sector began to decline immediately. The job loss rate in the private sector was reduced to zero in 13 months. Since then jobs have been added at a rate of 100,000 to 300,000 per month for almost 2 1/2 years. During this recovery the number of people working for the Fed has declined.
In Bush's last year unemployment skyrocketed from 5% to 10%. Since Obama took office the jobless rate has fallen to 8%.
Bush inherited a surplus and 8 years later ran the first trillion dollar deficit - not Obama. Bush also started 2 wars - not Obama.
These are all facts.
Here are 2 opinions based on the above facts.
Are we better off than we were 4 years ago (Sept. 22, 2011)? Actually, things are very similar but we are going in the opposite direction - up not down.
Are we better off than we were when Obama was inaugurated? Absolutely.
As for doubling down, Romney is asking me to double down on a policy that instantly turned surplus into deficit and ultimately led to the worst economic downturn of my lifetime.
No thanks.