Deadskins wrote:Red_One43 wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:Red_One43 wrote: Here’s what one
longtime general manager said he would do with tight end Chris

ey,
“He’s a glue guy, not a go-to guy. He’s a guy the quarterback gets comfortable with, and he’s an easy pitch-and-catch guy and a sure guy. But he’s not special. I don’t pay a guy like that much. Right now he’s a $3 million a year guy. I’d want him. This quarterback needs every weapon he can count on, and he’ll be a favorite target because
he’s so dependable. So he does have value [to Washington], but there’s no market place for those guys. It’s just more based on what he brings intangibly to the offense. He’s always in the right place. If he’s healthy, you like him.
He never was fast. He never was a great blocker. He had really good hands, and
he knew how to run good routes, and he has great instincts. You think more in terms of clutch. … But
because of the offense they want to run, I don’t know if he’s a fit anymore.”
http://community.washingtonexaminer.com/redskins/
2010 he was a top 3 TE in that offense "that he doesn't". Since that "nothing special" TE has been in the NFL he had caught more passes than all but five TEs (Gates, Gonzalez, Witten, and KW2 (3 more catches than

ey)).
I simply don't care if

ey is deemed athletically "special" by some long time GM. All I care about is that fact that he puts up top flight numbers when he is healthy. I don't care if he is flashy when doing it. He is a substance over style type player.
He has more catches than Mike Ditka, Dave Casper, Jay Novacek, Brent Jones and our own Jerry Smith had in their NFL careers! And he can probably play for another five years.
Yep

ey is nothing special!

I don't think that the GM meant his "not special" comment as a put down. I think that he is saying that

ey is not flashy, not the fastest TE, not the best blocker, not the biggest TE, not the most athletic, not the most powerful, but he is a guy who gets the job done. He has the instincts to be where his QB needs him to be. That explains that stats that you provide. The comment in my opinon was tongue in cheek.
I don't think it was tongue in cheek. He's basically saying

ey's overpaid and has no trade value.
"Tongue and cheek" is the wrong term that I used. This GM at the same time he is saying

ey is not special, sees

ey as special.
Not sure what you call that.
Let's look at all the attributes the longtime unnamed GM says about

ey
Negatives:
1. not a go to guy
2. don't pay a guy like that much
3. no trade value
4. never fast
5. never a great blocker
6. don't know if he is a fit where Redskins are going
7. If healthy
Summary of Negatives: The GM sees
ey as not a special TE
Positives:
1. a guy the quarterback gets comfortable with[
2. easy pitch-and-catch guy
3. a sure guy
4. I’d want him
5. This quarterback
needs every weapon he can count on.
6. and he’ll be a favorite target because he’s so dependable.
7. he does have value (to Washington)
8. He's always in the right place
9. good routes
10. great instincts
11. clutch
12. glue guy
Summary of positives: The GM seems to be implying that
ey is special - great instincts, dependability, clutch, are special qualities that only so few players have. He has to admit that he would want
ey.
I don't see the overall quote of this GM as a put down of

ey. Just an honest assessment of

ey from an opposing longtime GM, who has to be careful how he says things. There is more than enough positives in his statement to say tha tCooley is respected around the league.