The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:50 am**

Redskin in Canada wrote:Progress in the right direction.

Yeah... That's it right there.

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:15 pm**

I hope Rexy lives up to his nickname and... er... sexies up the G-strings.

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:26 pm**

Deadskins wrote:I hope Rexy lives up to his nickname and... er... sexies up the G-strings.

How long have you been working on that one? :wink:

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:29 pm**

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:I hope Rexy lives up to his nickname and... er... sexies up the G-strings.

How long have you been working on that one?

About two minutes. :lol:

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:37 pm**

skinsfan#33 wrote:You know what I like about this? Jason Reid's pompous a55 was flat out frakin wrong!

"The fix is in", "not a fair fight", "the job is Beck's to lose".

He was wrong, and is still a tool!

+1

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:56 pm**

Grossman's career numbers leave a lot to be desired. Hope his experience and this "system" get this thing going better than it has before. He's never compled 60% of his passes and has a career 70.9 rating.

Career Passing Stats
Year Team G Att Cmp Comp % Yds Yd/A TDs Int Sacked Yds Rating
2003 Chi 3 72 38 52.8 437 6.1 2 1 4 41 74.8
2004 Chi 3 84 47 56.0 607 7.2 1 3 5 22 67.9
2005 Chi 2 39 20 51.3 259 6.6 1 2 1 9 59.7
2006 Chi 16 480 262 54.6 3193 6.7 23 20 21 142 73.9
2007 Chi 8 225 122 54.2 1411 6.3 4 7 25 198 66.4
2008 Chi 4 62 32 51.6 257 4.1 2 2 2 8 59.7
2009 Hou 1 9 3 33.3 33 3.7 0 1 0 0 5.6
2010 Was 4 133 74 55.6 884 6.6 7 4 9 77 81.2
Totals 41 1104 598 54.2 7081 6.4 40 40 67 497 70.9

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:55 pm**

I'm going to side track this thread a little bit.

Who has a better performance on Sunday? McNabb with the Vikes or Rex?

I say Rex!

Posted: **Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:23 pm**

skinsfan#33 wrote:You know what I like about this? Jason Reid's pompous a55 was flat out frakin wrong!

"The fix is in", "not a fair fight", "the job is Beck's to lose".

He was wrong, and is still a tool!

So true, but remember he had that one tiny qualifier in there ("obviously anything can change") so you'll never convince him he was flat-out wrong.

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:29 am**

Irn-Bru wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:You know what I like about this? Jason Reid's pompous a55 was flat out frakin wrong!

"The fix is in", "not a fair fight", "the job is Beck's to lose".

He was wrong, and is still a tool!

So true, but remember he had that one tiny qualifier in there ("obviously anything can change") so you'll never convince him he was flat-out wrong.

I'm not looking to convince him. Everyone else knows he was flat out wrong.

You should have heard him yesterday AM on the Junkies doing his best Gregory Hines impersonation (tap dancing) and as fast as he was back peddling, if a bicycle could actually be peddled backwards, he could have win the Tour De France in reverse.

He was throwing so much BS out there that you could tell that even he didn't believe it.

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 7:07 am**

Something just seems wrong when dudes refer to Grossman as "sexy Rexy". Can we please abolish this nickname??

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:15 am**

OTOH... if it bugs the lawyer... do it twice as much.

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:45 pm**

This is my gut feeling. This game is going to come down to a very high pressure play. The score will be close. And it's going to make/break Rex's season, yes, in the first game. Scheme's and offenses can only mask a person tendencies but so much. When the game is on the line, when the pressure is bursting pipes, u revert back to second nature. And Rex's second nature is feast or famine and there's a lot of starving people in his past. LOLOLOL

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:21 pm**

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:Progress in the right direction.

Yeah... That's it right there.

Just curious. Can ther be progress in the WRONG direction :?:

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 4:57 pm**

yupchagee wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:Progress in the right direction.

Yeah... That's it right there.

Just curious. Can ther be progress in the WRONG direction

Yep, as moving forward onto the abyss. Just ask Vinny. He always made progress. :roll:

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:18 pm**

The Hogster wrote:Grossman's career numbers leave a lot to be desired. Hope his experience and this "system" get this thing going better than it has before. He's never compled 60% of his passes and has a career 70.9 rating.

Career Passing Stats
Year Team G Att Cmp Comp % Yds Yd/A TDs Int Sacked Yds Rating
2003 Chi 3 72 38 52.8 437 6.1 2 1 4 41 74.8
2004 Chi 3 84 47 56.0 607 7.2 1 3 5 22 67.9
2005 Chi 2 39 20 51.3 259 6.6 1 2 1 9 59.7
2006 Chi 16 480 262 54.6 3193 6.7 23 20 21 142 73.9
2007 Chi 8 225 122 54.2 1411 6.3 4 7 25 198 66.4
2008 Chi 4 62 32 51.6 257 4.1 2 2 2 8 59.7
2009 Hou 1 9 3 33.3 33 3.7 0 1 0 0 5.6
2010 Was 4 133 74 55.6 884 6.6 7 4 9 77 81.2
Totals 41 1104 598 54.2 7081 6.4 40 40 67 497 70.9

His best rating was with the Redskins? That's somewhat promising if you ignore that it was only for three games.

Posted: **Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:23 pm**

Redskin in Canada wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:Progress in the right direction.

Yeah... That's it right there.

Just curious. Can ther be progress in the WRONG direction

Yep, as moving forward onto the abyss. Just ask Vinny. He always made progress.

I never called what Vinnie did "Progress".

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Grossman Named Starter Per JLC