Page 4 of 6
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:57 pm
by RayNAustin
SnyderSucks wrote:Deadskins wrote:1niksder wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:RayNAustin wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Countertrey wrote:I'm really going to be disappointed with the Skins if they don't at least make a valiant effort to grab TJ.
Me too... the problem is, if they try, and fail, how will you know? They'll never say.
The problem with getting TJ is his contract. He's got $7 million guaranteed. So Seatlle doesn't save money by cutting him. They'll likely keep him unless they get a trade offer plus an agreement to pay a large portion of his salary. Would you give a pick plus $4 million for him?
Haynesworth is getting 4 Mil per game ... why not 4 Mil for a season that's likely to help just as much or more.
Now they don't have to give up the pick for him, so he's cheaper. And did I miss Haynesworth getting a big raise? Pretty sure $4 million a game would be a record.
His game checks will be about $212K this year
Yeah, but if you count the money he's guaranteed and already collected, it's much closer to 4 million than 212K.
Not quite. Even if you just count last season - 12 games at 4 million would be $48 million. That's what he would get over 4 full seasons.
He has 41 Mil Guaranteed .... and if you think Albert is going to play for three more years in a Redskin Jersey, I want some of what you're smoking.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:58 pm
by Countertrey
You KNOW he's going to test it, and get sat down, at least once...
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:20 pm
by 1niksder
RayNAustin wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Deadskins wrote:1niksder wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:RayNAustin wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Countertrey wrote:I'm really going to be disappointed with the Skins if they don't at least make a valiant effort to grab TJ.
Me too... the problem is, if they try, and fail, how will you know? They'll never say.
The problem with getting TJ is his contract. He's got $7 million guaranteed. So Seatlle doesn't save money by cutting him. They'll likely keep him unless they get a trade offer plus an agreement to pay a large portion of his salary. Would you give a pick plus $4 million for him?
Haynesworth is getting 4 Mil per game ... why not 4 Mil for a season that's likely to help just as much or more.
Now they don't have to give up the pick for him, so he's cheaper. And did I miss Haynesworth getting a big raise? Pretty sure $4 million a game would be a record.
His game checks will be about $212K this year
Yeah, but if you count the money he's guaranteed and already collected, it's much closer to 4 million than 212K.
Not quite. Even if you just count last season - 12 games at 4 million would be $48 million. That's what he would get over 4 full seasons.
He has 41 Mil Guaranteed .... and if you think Albert is going to play for three more years in a Redskin Jersey, I want some of what you're smoking.
I said $212K in response to:
RayNAustin wrote:Haynesworth is getting 4 Mil per game ... why not 4 Mil for a season that's likely to help just as much or more.
I didn't know you wanted me to include what he stole from "the Danny" through Vinny C.
He only got $11 million of the $41 mil last season or about $917K per game for 12 games. He'll pocket $24.6 mil this year. That'll be about $2.05 mil per game if he plays 12......
At 12 games a year by the end of this year he will have made almost $1.5 mil per game.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:26 pm
by 1niksder
Oldenburg might be headed for IR, that will live 5 more cuts.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:33 pm
by 1niksder
17. QB Richard Bartel
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:39 pm
by cvillehog
1niksder wrote:17. QB Richard Bartel
Not a shocker.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:57 pm
by frankcal20
COLT BRENNEN CUT IN OAKLAND

NOOOOOO
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:59 pm
by 1niksder
@granthpaulsen League source: #Redskins actively shopping Rinehart.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:02 pm
by PulpExposure
frankcal20 wrote:COLT BRENNEN CUT IN OAKLAND

NOOOOOO
Lol.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:05 pm
by frankcal20
I hope you know I was kidding.
Interesting thing about Reinhardt only b/c he does have tape and with the need of experienced lineman, he could be valuable for a 6th rd pick.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:11 pm
by 1niksder
frankcal20 wrote:I hope you know I was kidding.
Interesting thing about Reinhardt only b/c he does have tape and with the need of experienced lineman, he could be valuable for a 6th rd pick.
Russellmania09
Hearing from a source that Rhino was let go after practice, but it is not official. #Redskins 1 minute ago via web
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:12 pm
by Paralis
frankcal20 wrote:I hope you know I was kidding.
Interesting thing about Reinhardt only b/c he does have tape and with the need of experienced lineman, he could be valuable for a 6th rd pick.
Nobody's giving more than a conditional 7th for Rinehart. If a guard making vet min can't make the Redskins' 53, he's probably not making anybody else's either. Tape and experience cut both ways and it's got to hard to look at Rinehart on tape after 3 years of Buges and think that there's untapped potential left.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:33 pm
by frankcal20
I guess.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:34 pm
by PMG12569
I keep seeing O-lineman being let go....Cook, Capers, Robinson, and Rhino reportedly released or waived or whatever...Who the hell is left as depth?? Heyer, Oldenburg, Williams....who am I missing? Also, looks like Housh is going to Minnesota
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:35 pm
by frankcal20
Oldenburg may be going to IR. I think we'll be waiver wire searching too.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:36 pm
by Deadskins
22 net cuts needed today
1. Robinson
2. Torrain
3. Austin
4. Parker
5. Vickers
6. Tryon <-- traded
7. Jackson
8. Davis
9. Capers
10. Carter
11. Paulsen
12. Hodge
13. Robinson
14. Cook
15. Russell
16. Scott
17. Bartel
Less than a half hour to go, and five more cuts to make. Not sure why anyone would trade for a player they know we have to cut in the next 30 minutes.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:44 pm
by Countertrey
Because, waiver claims go by last years order of finish... If you were a 9-7 team, and believe that a 6-10 team is going to grab the player, you will trade a low draft pick to get him.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:46 pm
by Deadskins
Countertrey wrote:Because, waiver claims go by last years order of finish... If you were a 9-7 team, and believe that a 6-10 team is going to grab the player, you will trade a low draft pick to get him.
He would need to be someone you want pretty badly.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:53 pm
by Countertrey
Deadskins wrote:Countertrey wrote:Because, waiver claims go by last years order of finish... If you were a 9-7 team, and believe that a 6-10 team is going to grab the player, you will trade a low draft pick to get him.
He would need to be someone you want pretty badly.
Not really... teams take this type of flyer all the time... I suspect that's exactly what happened to cause us to trade Tryon to the Colts today... He was probably going to be cut... the Colts wanted a shot at him... and knowing that some bad team was likely to grab him, they traded at least one pick... we don't know the details yet...
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:00 pm
by Deadskins
Countertrey wrote:Deadskins wrote:Countertrey wrote:Because, waiver claims go by last years order of finish... If you were a 9-7 team, and believe that a 6-10 team is going to grab the player, you will trade a low draft pick to get him.
He would need to be someone you want pretty badly.
Not really... teams take this type of flyer all the time... I suspect that's exactly what happened to cause us to trade Tryon to the Colts today... He was probably going to be cut... the Colts wanted a shot at him... and knowing that some bad team was likely to grab him, they traded at least one pick... we don't know the details yet...
Yeah, but the Colts had a very good record last year, and Tryon was traded when there were several hours still left on the clock.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:01 pm
by frankcal20
It'll probably be a conditional round pick also. Hope he can do some big things this year. That'll mean better compensation for us.
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:15 pm
by yupchagee
Deadskins wrote:22 net cuts needed today
1. Robinson
2. Torrain
3. Austin
4. Parker
5. Vickers
6. Tryon <-- traded
7. Jackson
8. Davis
9. Capers
10. Carter
11. Paulsen
12. Hodge
13. Robinson
14. Cook
15. Russell
16. Scott
17. Bartel
Less than a half hour to go, and five more cuts to make. Not sure why anyone would trade for a player they know we have to cut in the next 30 minutes.
I'm trying to figure out cutting both Vickers & Paulsen. Don't most teams keep 3 TE's?
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:23 pm
by andyjens89
yupchagee wrote:I'm trying to figure out cutting both Vickers & Paulsen. Don't most teams keep 3 TE's?
Yes, but most teams don't have Lorenzo Alexander
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:27 pm
by 1niksder
andyjens89 wrote:yupchagee wrote:I'm trying to figure out cutting both Vickers & Paulsen. Don't most teams keep 3 TE's?
Yes, but most teams don't have Lorenzo Alexander
They converted Darrel Young to FB and kept Williams, that's 5 backs counting Big Mike
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:56 pm
by 1niksder
Redskins won't be releasing the full list until around 8 PM