
Official gameday thread...
-
- piglet
- Posts: 28
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:49 pm
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- Hog
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:34 pm
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- tribe
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
SCSkinsFan wrote:Paralis wrote:SCSkinsFan wrote:Any run that involved straight ahead blocking would have been a better call, than a stretch run play that gives their D Line and LB's a chance to read and react.
That actually pretty much was straight ahead blocking. Heyer got blocked straight back.
It'll be talked about after the game. I'm curious to know where that was supposed to go. But it looked like Heyer getting destroyed pushed that outside rather than the playcall (nobody was pulling, from what I saw).
The safety run was anything but a straight ahead run. Lousy blocking yes!
Agreed it was a stretch play. The question is the predictable, safe play is to run up the middle. The really risky play is putting it in JC's hands and make him make a quick decision. A reasonable play with a little risk is the stretch. It's a hindsight is 20-20 reaction to say that it's a bad play call.
If they sold out towards the middle and he got stuffed, you would be making the criticism of predictability. If he let JC drop back and he throws a pick, you'd criticize him. At some point, the players have to make plays.
This call wasn't ridiculous nor predictable to expect the stretch play to get you a couple of yards, and perhaps a crease is made on a sell-out towards the middle where you get a big run.
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
Just getting the sentiment on this board, who here really truly believes that better play calling will turn this team around?
Personally, I see a lot of players getting beat on plays that don't work. Switching the plays around I don't think would make a difference.
For example, I think the screen pass was the correct call many times, I just think the players do a terrible job of selling it. Perhaps this falls on the coaching staff for not teaching them well, but all these guys aren't newbies. They should be better at it.
Personally, I see a lot of players getting beat on plays that don't work. Switching the plays around I don't think would make a difference.
For example, I think the screen pass was the correct call many times, I just think the players do a terrible job of selling it. Perhaps this falls on the coaching staff for not teaching them well, but all these guys aren't newbies. They should be better at it.
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
dlc wrote:SCSkinsFan wrote:Paralis wrote:SCSkinsFan wrote:Any run that involved straight ahead blocking would have been a better call, than a stretch run play that gives their D Line and LB's a chance to read and react.
That actually pretty much was straight ahead blocking. Heyer got blocked straight back.
It'll be talked about after the game. I'm curious to know where that was supposed to go. But it looked like Heyer getting destroyed pushed that outside rather than the playcall (nobody was pulling, from what I saw).
The safety run was anything but a straight ahead run. Lousy blocking yes!
Agreed it was a stretch play. The question is the predictable, safe play is to run up the middle. The really risky play is putting it in JC's hands and make him make a quick decision. A reasonable play with a little risk is the stretch. It's a hindsight is 20-20 reaction to say that it's a bad play call.
If they sold out towards the middle and he got stuffed, you would be making the criticism of predictability. If he let JC drop back and he throws a pick, you'd criticize him. At some point, the players have to make plays.
This call wasn't ridiculous nor predictable to expect the stretch play to get you a couple of yards, and perhaps a crease is made on a sell-out towards the middle where you get a big run.
I think the real point here is that the call was on 2nd down, not 3rd down.
Safety and predictability at that postion on the field is accepatable. Another sneak by JC (he just gained 3 yards before the safety) would have even been better to get some beathing room. I did not lioke the strech run play call down there.
Last edited by SCSkinsFan on Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Skins fan Stuck in Panther land
-
- -------
- Posts: 2947
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 2:41 pm
- Location: Lanham, MD
dlc wrote:Just getting the sentiment on this board, who here really truly believes that better play calling will turn this team around?
Personally, I see a lot of players getting beat on plays that don't work. Switching the plays around I don't think would make a difference.
For example, I think the screen pass was the correct call many times, I just think the players do a terrible job of selling it. Perhaps this falls on the coaching staff for not teaching them well, but all these guys aren't newbies. They should be better at it.
Winning with this roster is kinda like trying to win a NASCAR race in a Hyundai.
***** Hail To The Redskins!!! *****
BA + MS = A New Beginning
BA + MS = A New Beginning
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
RedskinsFreak wrote:dlc wrote:Just getting the sentiment on this board, who here really truly believes that better play calling will turn this team around?
Personally, I see a lot of players getting beat on plays that don't work. Switching the plays around I don't think would make a difference.
For example, I think the screen pass was the correct call many times, I just think the players do a terrible job of selling it. Perhaps this falls on the coaching staff for not teaching them well, but all these guys aren't newbies. They should be better at it.
Winning with this roster is kinda like trying to win a NASCAR race in a Hyundai.
What's the old saying? Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice..........
That's why the screen pass was not the best call there.
Obviously lousy blocking affects JZ's playcalling. You can pretty see the lack of faith showing up in his play calling.
One problem feeds off of the other.
Skins fan Stuck in Panther land
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
RedskinjXd wrote:Walton40 wrote:R they going to throw toey this half?
i think they have to keep him in to block on batistes side. he might be a non-factor unless samuels comes back.
Reading some of the P-Cat Blogs earlier this week, they said that they were definitely going to concentrate on taking

Someone else is definitely goiing to have to step up.
Skins fan Stuck in Panther land
-
- Hog
- Posts: 2370
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- Hog
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:34 pm
-
- SCskinsFan
- Posts: 5381
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 10:16 am
- Location: Summerville, SC
- Contact:
-
- cleg
- Posts: 2649
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Giants Territory
so ugly
For a brief moment I thought this was the game that the team would put together a little something. But, I guess when you don't have an O Line there is only so much you can do.
Drinking the Kool-Aid again...
-
- Hog
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 7:34 pm