Skins vs Rams gameday thread

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:13 pm

RedskinsFreak wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SCSkinsFan wrote:Rams just showed why our failures in the Red Kryptonite Zone are so frustrating.

This. It wouldn't be a big deal if we had 14 points like we should.

I don't think the "if" card carries much weight in this argument.

Fact is they don't have 14 points, thanks to a most predictable and unimaginative offense.

the point of my post was that the defense giving up a TD wouldn't be a big deal IF we could score TD's

TeeterSalad · Post by **TeeterSalad** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:14 pm

DaSkins24 wrote:At least ey came to play.

If only they would pass to him in the red zone.

Amen, Brother.

dlc · Post by **dlc** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:15 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
dlc wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Lmao they score one TD and they're a joke? U expect them to shut them out? It wouldn't be a big deal if our offense could score a TD. U guys are unbelievable.

It's not that they scored a TD, it's how easy they gave it up. Despite the Rams screwing up a couple times, they scored.

it's onE TD. One. One for the entire half. One!!!

It's the Rams. The Rams, the frickin' Rams that made our defense look soft. One other drive was stopped by a drop even though he was open. It may be one TD, but they don't look dominant.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:16 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SCSkinsFan wrote:Rams just showed why our failures in the Red Kryptonite Zone are so frustrating.

This. It wouldn't be a big deal if we had 14 points like we should.

I don't think the "if" card carries much weight in this argument.

Fact is they don't have 14 points, thanks to a most predictable and unimaginative offense.

the point of my post was that the defense giving up a TD wouldn't be a big deal IF we could score TD's

You'll find "if" right in the middle of Life. Skins need to get some life when they enter the Red Kryptonite Zone. FG's don't get it. Didn;t get it done last, the year before than, and ................. And it won't get it done this year.

TeeterSalad · Post by **TeeterSalad** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:16 pm

O-line looks good today, I know, I know...its the Rams

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:18 pm

Nice catch by Kelly.

markshark84 · Post by **markshark84** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:18 pm

Is JC incapable of throwing the ball for more than 8 yards????

cleg · Post by **cleg** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:19 pm

markshark84 wrote:Is JC incapable of throwing the ball for more than 8 yards????

he can throw it far, just not near a redskin player.

markshark84 · Post by **markshark84** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:19 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SCSkinsFan wrote:Rams just showed why our failures in the Red Kryptonite Zone are so frustrating.

This. It wouldn't be a big deal if we had 14 points like we should.

I don't think the "if" card carries much weight in this argument.

Fact is they don't have 14 points, thanks to a most predictable and unimaginative offense.

the point of my post was that the defense giving up a TD wouldn't be a big deal IF we could score TD's

The biggest issue with our defense IS our offense.

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:21 pm

Good job, Santana.

All they do is shoot themselves in the foot, over and over.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:21 pm

SCSkinsFan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SCSkinsFan wrote:Rams just showed why our failures in the Red Kryptonite Zone are so frustrating.

This. It wouldn't be a big deal if we had 14 points like we should.

I don't think the "if" card carries much weight in this argument.

Fact is they don't have 14 points, thanks to a most predictable and unimaginative offense.

the point of my post was that the defense giving up a TD wouldn't be a big deal IF we could score TD's

ur not comprehending the flow of that convo that didn't include u and I know this because u are arguing a point to me that I agree with and Hav been yelling all game

You'll find "if" right in the middle of Life. Skins need to get some life when they enter the Red Kryptonite Zone. FG's don't get it. Didn;t get it done last, the year before than, and ................. And it won't get it done this year.

markshark84 · Post by **markshark84** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:22 pm

If we keep up this play, we will go 0-6 in the NFC East. Mark my word.

cleg · Post by **cleg** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:22 pm

i just dont see how he can reverse that call

dlc · Post by **dlc** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:22 pm

OK. Big time D's show up now!

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:22 pm

markshark84 wrote:If we keep up this play, we will go 0-6 in the NFC East. Mark my word.

If that's what it takes to get rid of Cerratto, then so be it. The guy is overmatched.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:23 pm

dlc wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
dlc wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Lmao they score one TD and they're a joke? U expect them to shut them out? It wouldn't be a big deal if our offense could score a TD. U guys are unbelievable.

It's not that they scored a TD, it's how easy they gave it up. Despite the Rams screwing up a couple times, they scored.

it's onE TD. One. One for the entire half. One!!!

It's the Rams. The Rams, the frickin' Rams that made our defense look soft. One other drive was stopped by a drop even though he was open. It may be one TD, but they don't look dominant.

u talk as if Marc Bulger isn't a good QB. U think too highly off the redskins. They beat us last year remember?

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:23 pm

Got too close to the RedKryptonite Zone again. There goes our 2 minute offense.
Thanks Tana.

amadkins · Post by **amadkins** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:23 pm

markshark84 wrote:If we keep up this play, we will go 0-6 in the NFC East. Mark my word.

More like 0-16 in the NFL.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:23 pm

Ok, who says deja' vu, all over again?
All at once now.

dlc · Post by **dlc** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:23 pm

dlc wrote:OK. Big time D's show up now!

NM. They're going to sit on it.

markshark84 · Post by **markshark84** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:24 pm

cleg wrote:i just dont see how he can reverse that call

It came out early. His knee, which hit the ground prior to his arm, was about 4 inches from the ground when the ball came out. It was a fumble.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:24 pm

markshark84 wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
SCSkinsFan wrote:Rams just showed why our failures in the Red Kryptonite Zone are so frustrating.

This. It wouldn't be a big deal if we had 14 points like we should.

I don't think the "if" card carries much weight in this argument.

Fact is they don't have 14 points, thanks to a most predictable and unimaginative offense.

the point of my post was that the defense giving up a TD wouldn't be a big deal IF we could score TD's

you sir are 300% correct
The biggest issue with our defense IS our offense.

DaSkins24 · Post by **DaSkins24** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:24 pm

And some sportswriters thought they would score over 30 points this week. Laughable. It takes them three games to score 30 points.

markshark84 · Post by **markshark84** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:25 pm

Maybe I am just venting, but my this team f&^$ing sucks -- or at least the offense does.

dlc · Post by **dlc** » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:27 pm

What does it say about a franchise if they lose to the Rams two years ina row and scores less points than a team that can't win a game?