Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:12 pm
Fios wrote:McCain got his butt handed to him
Thanks for that keen insight. Takes the conversation to a whole new level.
Thanks for that keen insight. Takes the conversation to a whole new level.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
J. McCain lost mainly because ...
Page 4 of 4
Thanks for that keen insight. Takes the conversation to a whole new level.
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:39 pm
KazooSkinsFan wrote:He should have lost by a lot more then that and he didn't.
True, and that speaks volumes about the electorate.
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:44 pm
JSPB22 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:He should have lost by a lot more then that and he didn't.
True, and that speaks volumes about the electorate.
Agreed.
Winston Churchill: The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter
The true idiocy was when the electorate nominated Obama and McCain even more then how it chose between them. Giving more power to LAWYERS and POLITICIANS is the path to economic prosperity and security for America! And we BOUGHT IT!
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:34 pm
Blah, blah, blah.KazooSkinsFan wrote:Giving more power to LAWYERS and POLITICIANS is the path to ...
You forgot the dreaded LIBERALS.
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:57 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Blah, blah, blah.KazooSkinsFan wrote:Giving more power to LAWYERS and POLITICIANS is the path to ...
You forgot the dreaded LIBERALS.
Same thing. Same thing.
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:56 pm
Redskin in Canada wrote:Blah, blah, blah.KazooSkinsFan wrote:Giving more power to LAWYERS and POLITICIANS is the path to ...
You forgot the dreaded LIBERALS.
Well, the problem with the dreaded liberals is their anti-choice agenda. Charity? Personal choice? No, government confiscation. Wall Street, if they're fragged up then create an alternative, PASS, government will dictate. Women, abortion, it's THEIR body! I agree, but the liberals don't when it comes to prostitution, drugs or even picking their own salary. Can workers reach a private agreement with employers on health care, working conditions or terms of employment? No, GOVERNMENT will dictate those. Can we chose what we will use for money, who will cut our hair, paint our toe nails, decorate our house, represent us in court, or treat us for illnesses? No, government will. Can we sell our own body parts? No, government will decide that. What about schools? Government indoctrination, no choice. Unemployment? Government will force you to pay it. Retirement? Government will take a 20% tax on your salary in exchange for a "supplement"
to your retirement. Thanks. Invest? Government will charge you twice, once on your "investment" (aka corporate tax) and again when you get the monehy. If you spend it you don't pay the double tax. Can you hire someone to care for your kids? If you adhere to government requirements. What is NOT free from government? When do liberals believe government should not be involved? Well, they are totally behind calling your buds in Yemen and discussing bomb making where the Yemeni government can listen to you and the US government can't, wow, the freedom lovers.
So go ahead and make another snotty "liberals blah blah" quote, but who's the extremist? Advocating we should make our own choices for our own interests? Or that government should?