Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 10:38 am
by Deadskins
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:31 pm
by welch
It takes a lot of optimism to assume that both rookie WR's will play Moss and ARE out of a job. Even if, somehow, both turn out to be starting-caliber, that leaves room for a couple of small, fast, and smart WR's. Recall Monk/Clark/Sanders.
However, as almost everyone in Hogsnet-land has mentioned, it would be a giant stroke of luck to get two big capable WR's in the same draft. Hasn't happened, in my memory, with the Redskins.
The only time they had a pair of big, fast, WR's was when George Allen offended the "experts" by picking up Roy Jefferson from the Steelers. "You're giving up the future!" screamed Those Who Know. Allen aded Jefferson to Charley Taylor, who had been a star for six or seven seasons already.
Two starting WR's at once? Whether big guys or small guys? Look up the rosters. Closest is the season in the mid-80s when they picked up Clark and Sanders...but that was a fluke, and they complemented (attention FIOS: note correct use of "complemented"!!) Art Monk, member of the Hall of Fame.
(Not meaning to shout the name, but Art Monk deserves always to be in bold-face. For so many reasons...)
RECIEVERS GETTING OPEN
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:34 pm
by alceazy
IS SANTANA A BONIFIED #1 RECIEVER IT SEEMS 2 ME THAT HIM OR ANY OF THE RECIEVERS CAN GET OPEN WHEN NEEDED BUT CAMBELL GETS THE BLAME 4 EVERYTHING I FEEL CAMB. BITES HIS TOUNGE IN INTERVIEWS AND IN PRACTICE NOT TO CALL THE GUYS OUT JUST THINK BACK 2 BEFORE GIBBS PULLED BRUNELL BETTS WAS THE TEAMS LEADING RECIEVER AND THE RECIEVERS DIDNT HAVE ANY TD'S THINK ABOUT IT
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:47 pm
by Countertrey
What????
English, please.
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:52 pm
by BossHog
Welcome to the board.
Why are you typing in Caps? Are you angry?
Just my personal opinion, but your posts are near impossible to read. This isn't MSN Messenger, we allow full words and punctuation here.

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:54 pm
by 1niksder
We also have a thread on this subject
I'll move there for you
And welcome to the Site