Redskin in Canada wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:... Tough luck.
From Snyder lover to Snyder critic to Snyder apologist ...
Is that what they call FLIP- FLOP, FLIP - FLOP in US politics? Have some respect for yourself man.
Since you want to attack me in every thread, I'll consolidate my thoughts in this one.
First, just about everyone was going ballistic because Dan was even considering hiring Fassel. Folks were ready to storm Redskins Park if Dan did in fact hire him. Now that Dan decided not to hire Fassel, you morn for Fassel and criticize Dan for "stringing him along". Damned if if does, damned if he doesn't, right?
Do you have any comprehension of an interview process? You interview everyone before making a decision. You don't inform anyone of anything until all the interviews are complete and a decision is made. Fassel was mostly strung along by the media dubbing him the "leading candidate" day after day. In the end, Dan made the right decision not hiring Fassel.
Dan hires him, you bash him. Dan doesn't hire him, you bash him.
That is proof positive, beyond any reasonable doubt, that is doesn't matter what Dan does, good or bad, you'll search far and wide for anything to bash him for.
The is a huge difference between people like you and people like me. You simply want someone to blame, and exercise that in the form of endless hate focused at one person. I don't. I don't hate like you do. That's
your problem and
your misery, not mine. I sleep well at night, apparently you don't. Some are so quick to judge and fear the unknown. Steve Largent made an interesting comment to Zorn. He said fans in Seattle don't turn on you the way fans do in Redskins land.
Football is a team sport. No one person is solely responsible for everything and anything, good or bad. I've criticized Dan for decisions I disagreed with, like the firing of Williams. But at the same time, I have the decency, respect and nads to offer credit where credit it due, and Dan has done things in the past I've applauded and agreed with.
I agreed with the hiring of Gibbs. At the time, I agreed with the firing of Marty and the hiring of Spurrier and Marvin Lewis. It didn't work out, but at least I have the balls to admit that I supported Dan in those decisions, at the time. Dan has made some mistakes, but I also thinks he's done some good things.
I believe Dan is honestly and genuinely trying to field a winning team. Dan has actually done better than than some other owners out there. But Lord forbid he gets any credit for that. Dan's team has made the playoffs three times in his eight years, if I remember correctly. During that same period of time, how many other teams didn't make the playoffs at all or didn't win a game in the post season?
You use the luxury of hindsight and retrospect to fuel your agenda.

, if that's how you are, but I don't operate that way. And I certainly don't sit on my high horse or pedestal and act as though I know more than these folks, or act like I "could" do it better "if" I actually worked in the industry. For comparison purposes, which team do you own and which sports franchise do you manage?
Portis fumbles the ball and you blame Dan. Gibbs calls two timeouts at the end of a game and you blame Dan. Gibbs doesn't win a Super Bowl in his second tenure and you want to blame Dan. Whatever. Your just looking for someone to blame so you can sleep better at night.
I agree Dan isn't perfect, but neither am I and neither is anybody else. You go right on ahead and cast stones if that's what you want to do. I know you wished everyone hated Dan like you do, but many don't. I respect the fact that you and others have been disappointed by a lack of a championship during Snyder's reign. That's your right. But blanket hate for someone in not something I'm prepared to embrace, and that's my right. As I've said before, I'm a Redskins fan and I support the team. For me, it's about the team, not the owner, I can't control what he does.