Page 4 of 4

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:51 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Justice Hog wrote:
BossHog wrote:
Justice Hog wrote:The Ravens defense looked strong against our offense, as did our against theirs.


They did? I didn't see the broadcast but I'm not really sure when or where the Ravens defense looked good. It certainly wasn't in the 7-on-7's which was the ONLY time the Redskin starters played. The Redskins' offense marched down the field pretty much at will. The first three plays were throws to Cooley and every one of them was not only a completion but a fairly substantial gain as well.

It was a lot 'closer' in the 11-on-11s but the Redskins' starters didn't even see the field. The Ravens starters did see some time though.


There were some early plays that they stuffed us pretty good. Maybe it was also a function of J. Campbell not really getting on track, too. On TV, it just looked like the Ravens "D" did an adequate job.


If they ONLY did an "adequate job" against our second string guys, they're in big trouble.

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:33 pm
by Irn-Bru
So did our second string offense face the first string Raven's D? Or did our 2nd offense face the Raven's 2nd defense?

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:16 pm
by spenser
I have the game Tivo'ed and we pretty much worked them! i was kinda drunk watching it live, but after watching it again we did very well, especially considering it was our 2nd stringers. I really liked how accurate and how quickly the ball was coming out of brunells hands though. He had a nice little rythem going there.

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:21 pm
by 1niksder
Irn-Bru wrote:So did our second string offense face the first string Raven's D? Or did our 2nd offense face the Raven's 2nd defense?

For the most part it looked like our 2nd string faced their starters, but it's hard to tell because the Ravens LBs all wore single digit jerseys

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:21 pm
by SkinsChic
Wow...I can't believe they sent out a survey asking for our opinions of the way Fan Appreciation Day / Scrimmage was handled. The only problem was - the did not offer a space to REALLY put down what you wanted to say - so I responded with a couple page email to the original email.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:23 pm
by Fios
Yeah, they don't really care what everyone thought so much as they want to poll people and determine how to better monetize next year's event

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:30 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
FFAD sucked! Thats pretty much it. It was great sitting with all of the crew.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:39 pm
by Irn-Bru
CLL wrote:FFAD sucked!


Stop saying that I suck! :evil: