Niner Fan with Info

skinpride1 · Post by **skinpride1** » Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:52 pm

Damn talk about pulling some skeletons out of the closet this thread was started in 06!!! Brandon who?lol

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:45 am

For the record Lloyd never got playing time. Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

Kilmer72 · Post by **Kilmer72** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:50 am

HEROHAMO wrote:For the record Lloyd never got playing time. Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

That was because he was too busy ticking off staff members and dropping balls.

Kilmer72 · Post by **Kilmer72** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:00 am

Kilmer72 wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:For the record Lloyd never got playing time. Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

That was because he was too busy ticking off staff members and dropping balls.

In his defense though he did make some spectacular catches but not the easy ones or even clutch ones very often. Thrash is old.

Kilmer72 · Post by **Kilmer72** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:41 am

One last thing. In the end I think it was a character issue more than anything else. Gibbs wanted real Redskins. I wish I could get all my thoughts together at one time so I do not catch a bad time for this but I am trying and learning my way here. Please do not tell me hey hey hey on with the topic because I am. Peace be with you guys and gals

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:51 am

HEROHAMO wrote:Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

What a ludicrous statement. I guess that's why he's no longer here, because he played better than ARE and Thrash. :roll:

langleyparkjoe · Post by **langleyparkjoe** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:40 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

What a ludicrous statement. I guess that's why he's no longer here, because he played better than ARE and Thrash.

Well let's see Vet and Hero...

B. Lloyd:
2006- 365yards, average 15.9yards, TD=0, Fumble=1
2007- 14yards, average 7yards, TD=0, Fumble=0

Trash:
2006- 151yards, average 12.6yards, TD=1, Fumble=0
2007- 107yards, average 11.9yards, TD=2, Fumble=1

ARE:
2006- 351yards, average 11yards, TD=0, Fumble=2
2007- 728yards, average 14.3yards, TD=0, Fumble=3

So I guess clearly it looks like due to the TD's, Trash was actually better and ARE was better with yards. Those fumbles pull ARE down and Trash, well Trash has become our clutch guy. B. Lloyd couldn't catch a pass while he was open and made spectacular acrobatic catches while covered :hmm:

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:27 am

langleyparkjoe wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:Even on the bench he played better than ARE and Thrash.

What a ludicrous statement. I guess that's why he's no longer here, because he played better than ARE and Thrash.

Well let's see Vet and Hero...

B. Lloyd:
2006- 365yards, average 15.9yards, TD=0, Fumble=1
2007- 14yards, average 7yards, TD=0, Fumble=0
2008- 364 yards, average 14 yards, TD=2, Fumble=0

ARE:
2006- 351yards, average 11yards, TD=2, Fumble=2
2007- 728yards, average 14.3yards, TD=3, Fumble=3
2008- 593yards, average 11.2yards, TD=4, Fumble=2

So I guess clearly it looks like due to the TD's, Trash was actually better and ARE was better with yards. Those fumbles pull ARE down and Trash, well Trash has become our clutch guy. B. Lloyd couldn't catch a pass while he was open and made spectacular acrobatic catches while covered

The beauty is that you proved my point. If you humor my inferior intellect, you'll see that production between for Lloyd DECREASED between 2006 and 2007, while ARE INCREASED by twofold.

I thought Thrash should have been gone two years ago, so I'm not even bothering with him. I also fixed a few inconguencies with what you posted, highlighted in yellow for your viewing pleasure.

ARE adds value as a gadget QB, just ask Cool

ey.