Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:30 pm
spenser wrote:Jason Campbell is not the answer.
Only the 1st game, in a totally new system. Hold your horses...
Only the 1st game, in a totally new system. Hold your horses...
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Official Redskins-Giants Game Thread
Page 28 of 34
Only the 1st game, in a totally new system. Hold your horses...
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:30 pm
1niksder wrote:Hoss wrote:brooks looks good......
Because we are seeing him a lot
but he does look good.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:31 pm
Burress again! Imagine that!
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:31 pm
I absolutely hate Plaxico.....the only reason he's a good WR is because he is 7 inches taller than everyone else who is covering him
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:31 pm
Rogers was not worthy of the #9 overall pick.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:32 pm
fleetus wrote:spenser wrote:Jason Campbell is not the answer.
Only the 1st game, in a totally new system. Hold your horses...
Your right, im just pissed. But he has not shown me much
Punters
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:32 pm
We really should have kept Frost, and Brooks.
Brooks is getting exausted.
Brooks is getting exausted.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:32 pm
I don't think I even enjoy pro football, or football at all anymore
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:32 pm
Anything?spenser wrote:fleetus wrote:spenser wrote:Jason Campbell is not the answer.
Only the 1st game, in a totally new system. Hold your horses...
Your right, im just pissed. But he has not shown me much
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 pm
Landry..almost!
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 pm
The only thing that I can hope for is to see J-Camp throw for 50 more yards to get to 100 total...but I don't see us getting the ball back
ANOTHER INT dropperd! That's 5 total that should've been caught
ANOTHER INT dropperd! That's 5 total that should've been caught
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 pm
Gibbs4Life wrote:I don't think I even enjoy pro football, or football at all anymore
we are so on the same page
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 pm
spudstr04 wrote:I absolutely hate Plaxico.....the only reason he's a good WR is because he is 7 inches taller than everyone else who is covering him
exactly. why in the hell can a player be better because they have an advantage. that sucks.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:33 pm
1niksder wrote:Hoss wrote:brooks looks good......
Because we are seeing him a lot
Yeah he's in a "rhythm" like the talking heads like to say. I'm pretty sure that's not a good thing.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
Hoss wrote:spudstr04 wrote:I absolutely hate Plaxico.....the only reason he's a good WR is because he is 7 inches taller than everyone else who is covering him
exactly. why in the hell can a player be better because they have an advantage. that sucks.
hahahaha....yeah my argument is bad, but honestly if he was 6'1'' like Thrash...he'd be average
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
RayNAustin wrote:cvillehog wrote:OK, what is the point in punting? We are afraid to lose by too much? How about we try to win?
There's 10 min left....you can't go for it there...are you nuts?
We're down two scores, and we won't see the ball again before four minutes tick off the clock, and possibly go down another score. So, what's better, risk going down another score with barely any time taken off the clock, or guarantee a lot of time off the clock and still possibly go down another score?
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
Nice sack by Wilson
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
Big play Chris Wilson!
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
start wilson next week
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:34 pm
The defense has woken up.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:35 pm
nice punt...91 yards to a TD...it ain't gonna happen
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:35 pm
We would have been better with Al saunders at head coach.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:35 pm
ARE decision to not catch the ball got us an extra 5 yds with the reverse bounce! Brilliant!
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:35 pm
I don't care who it is, we have to have someone else return punts
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:36 pm
More than his usual return...lol Even if he was trying for the touchbackSCSkinsFan wrote:ARE decision to not catch the ball got us an extra 5 yds with the reverse bounce! Brilliant!