Page 27 of 27

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:15 pm
by The Hogster
tcwest10 wrote:
The Hogster wrote:I don't know why, but I am frustrated after this loss, the losses for the past 3 weeks hurt now.


:hmm:

Didn't we win ? What'd I miss ? Just got home from work.



GOTHCA :wink:

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:16 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Hey NikiH, they forgot to sing.......

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:17 pm
by 1niksder
SCSkinsFan wrote:And how can I pick it up 1Nik ?

Click on the link

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:18 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Thanks. Time to get a User name & a Password set up?

Fitzpatrick saying our D didn't give him any oppotunity to learn on the job today.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:19 pm
by gilbertarenas
Flit wrote:I don't care if they are the worst team to play football in history, after three heart breaking losses it's nice to get a W under our belts hopefully we can carry this into the desert and beat them there as well so we can get ready for the main events with the three divisonal games.


I can complain and be happy :lol:

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:21 pm
by SCSkinsFan
ArizonaHOG wrote:Running the football wins games!!!
Hail to the Redskins, Hail Victory!

Looking forward to seeing some of you at the Cardinals game next week, representing the Burgandy and Gold.


Give 'em hell out therre in the desert next week AZ. A guy in the office next to me is an AZ fan. Ugh! I feel real sorry for him.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:36 pm
by JPM36
Great win, defense was awesome.

4 in a row or we don't go.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:37 pm
by die cowboys die
FiveWidez wrote:
gilbertarenas wrote:
skinpride1 wrote:
thaiphoon wrote:No biggie ... I put blame where I see it. O-Line is not playing well enough to make any QB comfortable back there
sorry don't see that one.Brunell has had plenty of time to throw!!lack of wr's and not finding anyone open!!The bad part is that's really going to hurt us going against better defenses!!!


I think this can be attributed to play calling as well. Brunell has committed the same boneheaded interceptions that Ramsey has. They need someone to stretch the field maybe Brown but something that needs to be addressed in the offseason.


Please stop it. Ramsey threw more picks in one game last season than Brunell has all year.


first of all, that is completely bogus. secondly, brunell doesn't throw a lot of picks, he just fumbles every game instead. at least INTs happen downfield a little bit. fumbles are WORSE.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:46 pm
by sch1977
thaiphoon wrote:
Combined you have a solid run game that will eat clock


Against the 29th ranked defense and getting pushed back on 3rd and 1. If you want to be a playoff calibre team you convert thos and get the push off the ball. From what I saw today it was the RB's more than the O-Line getting us those yards. But for you ... I'll change my assessment and say they played spotty at best (good in some stretches and bad in others)


For goodness sakes, WE WON THE GAME!! :roll:

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:51 pm
by thaiphoon
Yes we did ... while I'm happy we won the game I'm just being honest in my personal assessment here.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:09 pm
by welch
I'm puzzled. NFL.COM shows that the Redskins won the game...the stats indicate that they pounded the Rams and scored two TD's in the 4th quarter.

Is that right? From reading this thread, it sounds like they lost. Weird. Portis and Cartright each gained 100 yards. Brunell completed 3/4 of his passes, but we're grumbling? Robert Royal caught four passes...is that the same Royal we had tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail?

Bizarre.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:37 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
welch wrote:I'm puzzled. NFL.COM shows that the Redskins won the game...the stats indicate that they pounded the Rams and scored two TD's in the 4th quarter.

Is that right? From reading this thread, it sounds like they lost. Weird. Portis and Cartright each gained 100 yards. Brunell completed 3/4 of his passes, but we're grumbling? Robert Royal caught four passes...is that the same Royal we had tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail?

Bizarre.


Yes, I hate Royal. He's such a whimp. He caught the ball this game, big deal I can catch too. He doesn't fight for yardage and goes down easier than Portis. He's by no means off the hook.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:37 pm
by thaiphoon
I think if we hadn't lost the previous 3 the mood would be better. Still too many stupid mistakes and still getting stuffed on 3rd and 1. Still I'm happy about the win and yes we actually did outscore an opponent in the 4th quarter and Royal actually held onto the ball.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:08 am
by die cowboys die
welch wrote:I'm puzzled. NFL.COM shows that the Redskins won the game...the stats indicate that they pounded the Rams and scored two TD's in the 4th quarter.

Is that right? From reading this thread, it sounds like they lost. Weird. Portis and Cartright each gained 100 yards. Brunell completed 3/4 of his passes, but we're grumbling? Robert Royal caught four passes...is that the same Royal we had tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail?

Bizarre.


welch, the stats do seem to indicate we should be a lot happier. but i think we are not sold on the quality of the opponent. they looked pretty dang lousy. i think few people here feel we'll be able to replicate these results against a good team. plus, the passing game was way, way off for a good while. made us pretty nervous.

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:57 pm
by UK Skins Fan
Fortunately, there aren't any good teams left on our schedule (I guess you might just call the Giants mediocre?). I still can't get excited about our prospects, but hope remains. The way we have played the last six weeks, we have no right to even dream of the playoffs, but maybe...