Page 23 of 27

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:49 pm
by EA7649
atleast we can't say the oline screwed us this week 209 yards rushing!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:49 pm
by skinpride1
thank god the rams defense stinks.With all the runs a good defense would have stuffed us and we would be punting it back again.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:49 pm
by Flit
Just chewing the clock up with the running game it looks like. Should go back to 6-6 after this weekend.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:49 pm
by thaiphoon
No biggie ... I put blame where I see it. O-Line is not playing well enough to make any QB comfortable back there

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:49 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Rock is still rolling!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:50 pm
by FiveWidez
gilbertarenas wrote:Yes, the offensive line only managed to produce 200 yards rushing. Brunell just doesn't handle pressure very well.


Stop embarrasing yourself. Refer to the Dallas tape for pressure passing.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:50 pm
by Flit
Both backs with 100 yards, go ground game!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:50 pm
by EA7649
goalline time!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by redskingush
Trivia Questions

When was the last time we had 2 backs over 100 in the same game?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by gilbertarenas
FiveWidez wrote:I am betting most of you would hate any quarterback. Its the easy for fans to blame the quarterback since he touches the ball every play. Please don't emabarass yourselves. Come up with a better excuse when the team doesn't do well.


I didn't hate Ramsey, Matthews, Wuerfell, Hasselback, Banks, or Graham; although I did hate that other qb before them.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by The Hogster
Definining moment, can we put a game away?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by gilbertarenas
Hate is such a strong word to describe Brunell; I think this franchise needs someone who is GOOD!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by redskingush
gilbertarenas wrote:
FiveWidez wrote:I am betting most of you would hate any quarterback. Its the easy for fans to blame the quarterback since he touches the ball every play. Please don't emabarass yourselves. Come up with a better excuse when the team doesn't do well.


I didn't hate Ramsey, Matthews, Wuerfell, Hasselback, Banks, or Graham; although I did hate that other qb before them.


I dis like tony Banks

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by Flit
I'll go back to Stevo's reign with Kenny watson and Ladell Betts, have no idea who against though

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by thaiphoon
TD - Cooley !!!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:51 pm
by SCSkinsFan
3rd & goal.We need 7. Don't settle for 3 Joe!
Yes, TD Cooley!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:52 pm
by Flit
Time to drink the Cooley-aid!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:52 pm
by Redskin in Canada
I am still here. And I am not leaving guys.

Trust me. We will win this one.

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:52 pm
by FiveWidez
gilbertarenas wrote:
FiveWidez wrote:I am betting most of you would hate any quarterback. Its the easy for fans to blame the quarterback since he touches the ball every play. Please don't emabarass yourselves. Come up with a better excuse when the team doesn't do well.


I didn't hate Ramsey, Matthews, Wuerfell, Hasselback, Banks, or Graham; although I did hate that other qb before them.


Ummm Yeah ok

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:52 pm
by redskingush
gilbertarenas wrote:Hate is such a strong word to describe Brunell; I think this franchise needs someone who is GOOD!


I know its strong, i really do hate him!

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:53 pm
by EA7649
the coolmista

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:53 pm
by Manchester_Redskin
Excellent, I'm off back to Thailand this week, a good send off by the skins

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:53 pm
by IONTOP
HORRAY...

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:53 pm
by gilbertarenas
I would say game over in normal circumstances but considering the luck we had the past 3 weeks; I'll hold my breath for a little longer

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:53 pm
by Irn-Bru
This game is over.


No team can make a 13+ point comeback with only 5:00 to play in a game.




. . . :shock: