Official THN Gameday Thread: Skins vs the other team

HitDoctor · Post by **HitDoctor** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:54 pm

It is good to not time out because Brusmell sucks!!!

gus · Post by **gus** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:54 pm

did dallas call the final TO

#1fan · Post by **#1fan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:54 pm

redskingush wrote:
#1fan wrote:Why not use the timeouts. We aren't even trying to score

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

True, but why not attempt something deep maybe draw a pass interference.

NikiH · Post by **NikiH** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:54 pm

Ok that was just weird. Was it miscommunication or what??

thaiphoon · Post by **thaiphoon** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

You're down by 7 points...IN Dallas ... your offense hasn't done squat yet... you need to get it cranking. They are going to play prevent ... so why not take your shots ??

vtfootball07 · Post by **vtfootball07** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

redskingush wrote:
#1fan wrote:Why not use the timeouts. We aren't even trying to score

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

Ok, so assuming we do throw it deep and there is an interception, what are the odds that they would score a touchdown? That could conceivably be worth it. If it isn't, then maybe thats the reason for us never going deep.

nnskinsfan · Post by **nnskinsfan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

Not sure what they were thinking. Hopefully we'll get in sync during the 2nd half.

snyder_is_the_devil · Post by **snyder_is_the_devil** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

Well, this isn't exactly a clinic on GREAT football from either sideline. Who can get their 5h1t together first?

SkinzCanes · Post by **SkinzCanes** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

Why in the world did we pay to bring in 2 free agent wr's if we aren't even going to use them? We have a great receiving corpse and it doesnt even look like we are trying to get them the ball.

redskingush · Post by **redskingush** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

#1fan wrote:
redskingush wrote:
#1fan wrote:Why not use the timeouts. We aren't even trying to score

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

True, but why not attempt something deep maybe draw a pass interference.

Hey im with you, Im not sure whats going on.

gus · Post by **gus** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:55 pm

55 secs and 2 time outs, not even going for 3?

#1fan · Post by **#1fan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

vtfootball07 wrote:
redskingush wrote:
#1fan wrote:Why not use the timeouts. We aren't even trying to score

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

Ok, so assuming we do throw it deep and there is an interception, what are the odds that they would score a touchdown? That could conceivably be worth it. If it isn't, then maybe thats the reason for us never going deep.

We are down by seven IMO we should play to win.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

#1fan wrote:
redskingush wrote:
#1fan wrote:Why not use the timeouts. We aren't even trying to score

Isnt this managing the game, Joe doesnt want a int

True, but why not attempt something deep maybe draw a pass interference.

BECAUSE HE CAN'T THROW DEEP!

air_hog · Post by **air_hog** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

Halftime Thoughts:

What are we trying to accomplish on offense... I'll just leave it at that.

Brunell looks terrified in the pocket.

Our D-Line is getting NO, I mean NO pressure on Bledsoe and he has all day to pick apart our secondary.

-Overall, a terrible first half on offense, but we are still in this game.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

This is a joke, we need a qb that can get our weapons the ball, even Madden and Michaels recognize that and said it in a nice way so as to not hurt anyones feelings.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

NikiH wrote:Ok that was just weird. Was it miscommunication or what??

No answer for that last series. Weird is putting it mildly.

SkinzCanes · Post by **SkinzCanes** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:56 pm

55 secs and 2 time outs, not even going for 3?

That's playing not to lose, not playing to win.

nnskinsfan · Post by **nnskinsfan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:57 pm

Brunell seems to be afraid of throwing it deep. Sometimes you have to take a chance so I hope he comes around at some point.

thaiphoon · Post by **thaiphoon** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:57 pm

55 secs and 2 time outs, not even going for 3?

I'm with you here... we burned them for 14 points in less time last year with less talent on the offense... why aren't we going for the points???

This_Heat · Post by **This_Heat** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:57 pm

lack of pressure is the most frustrating thing IMO...

#1fan · Post by **#1fan** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:57 pm

SkinzCanes wrote:
55 secs and 2 time outs, not even going for 3?

That's playing not to lose, not playing to win.

I'll second that

redskingush · Post by **redskingush** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:57 pm

SkinzCanes wrote:Why in the world did we pay to bring in 2 free agent wr's if we aren't even going to use them? We have a great receiving corpse and it doesnt even look like we are trying to get them the ball.

Because, I dont care what the coaching staff says, the have no faith in brunell, it is apparent more and more to me that he is the only option they have at QB.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:58 pm

1fan4ramsey wrote:This is a joke, we need a qb that can get our weapons the ball, even Madden and Michaels recognize that and said it in a nice way so as to not hurt anyones feelings.

gus · Post by **gus** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:58 pm

This_Heat wrote:lack of pressure is the most frustrating thing IMO...

Amen to that, front 4 have to come up with some pressure

Steve Spurrier III · Post by **Steve Spurrier III** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:58 pm

It's not like our two-minute (or 55 second) offense is that bad. They did a decent job getting into field goal position last week.

That being said, I don't blame Gibbs for trying to push it. Getting out of the first half only down by seven isn't that bad.