The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Scottskins wrote:I seriously doubt PRam can play as bad as Brunell has the last 5 weeks...

I agree

Get him out man!!! Get him out!!!!

redskincity wrote:Get him out man!!! Get him out!!!!

Last five attempts
1 completion for minus 7
3 sacks
1 int

gabrielm wrote:

1niksder wrote:

Redskin in Canada wrote:Does anybody have a link to a free radio webcast?

I guess the first link didn't work ...it was reported they would cover the game but I hear music.
Sorry
try this one http://www.620wtmj.com/620listenlive/index-new-alt.asp

this one is working.

ok. i lied. i just goes to ads after 15 seconds.

anyone else got other suggestions?

Royal should have caught that ball
!!

Ramsey wouldn't be avoiding these sacks any better--in fact, he probably would have been sacked 1-2 more times than Brunell has been already, possibly with a fumble.

I don't think that Brunell has been playing well, but just because he's not doing a good job means that Ramsey will magically be better.

I still think we can win this game, heres why;

Keep throwing TDs!!!!!!!!!!

Do notraise your hopes too much.

This was a miracle.

gabrielm wrote:

gabrielm wrote:

1niksder wrote:

Redskin in Canada wrote:Does anybody have a link to a free radio webcast?

I guess the first link didn't work ...it was reported they would cover the game but I hear music.
Sorry
try this one http://www.620wtmj.com/620listenlive/index-new-alt.asp

this one is working.

ok. i lied. i just goes to ads after 15 seconds.

anyone else got other suggestions?

Try it again ...it's the same station NFL.com is using
if not go here ...but it's hard to get on
http://www.geocities.com/sonapullen/index2.html

ramsey would likely have the same amount of sacks, 1 int, and the score would probably be tied right now. If he had been playing all season, he would be better than that.

FanfromAnnapolis wrote:Ramsey wouldn't be avoiding these sacks any better--in fact, he probably would have been sacked 1-2 more times than Brunell has been already, possibly with a fumble.

I don't think that Brunell has been playing well, but just because he's not doing a good job means that Ramsey will magically be better.

Well lets not guess about it, put Ramsey in and lets see what happens.

Brunell looks horrible. You have to be a fool to defend his play today or in the previous weeks including his last days in Florida.

I'm just saying that we can't be impatient fans. Argue for Ramsey if you will, but I don't think that there's any way that he'd be doing better (realistically). For once, at least, the other team hasn't scored TDs off of our quaterback (hope I'm not speaking too soon). . . .

Favre is going beyond 230 yds passing and we have not even gone to half-time...

What is the idea about these short passes for negative yards???

FanfromAnnapolis wrote:I'm just saying that we can't be impatient fans. Argue for Ramsey if you will, but I don't think that there's any way that he'd be doing better (realistically). For once, at least, the other team hasn't scored TDs off of our quaterback (hope I'm not speaking too soon). . . .

I will argue and have, O.K.

'Realistically' you dont know what will happen until you try it. That with anything in life.

As far as Brunell fumbling ball, stay tuned. The pattern has not fail yet.

the fans arent saying BOO cues its halloween

Redskin in Canada wrote:Favre is going beyond 230 yds passing and we have not even gone to half-time...

Farve.. 11 of 15 for 191 yrds 1 TD 1 int
Brunell 12 of 16 for 107 yrds 1 TD 1 int

1niksder wrote:

Redskin in Canada wrote:Favre is going beyond 230 yds passing and we have not even gone to half-time...

Farve.. 11 of 15 for 191 yrds 1 TD 1 int
Brunell 12 of 16 for 107 yrds 1 TD 1 int

Favre 14/18 234 yds 1 TD 1 int !!!
Brunell 12/17 97 yds 1 TD 1 int !!!

i must say as much as i dont want the skins to loose yet another game. we do need a change in washington..... ie...ramsy and kerry

I dont think our defense will be #1 after this game.

now consider how much better our secondary is than Green Bays and look at the QB comparison again...

If we just had a guy who could hit OPEN receivers, we'd be a very very good football team

Redskin in Canada wrote:What is the idea about these short passes for negative yards???

Those are about as far as Brunell can throw. Did you all notice that Favre threw one about 75 yards when it didn't really matter and Brunell's hail mary was only about 50?

Redskin in Canada wrote:

1niksder wrote:

Redskin in Canada wrote:Favre is going beyond 230 yds passing and we have not even gone to half-time...

Farve.. 11 of 15 for 191 yrds 1 TD 1 int
Brunell 12 of 16 for 107 yrds 1 TD 1 int

Favre 14/18 234 yds 1 TD 1 int !!!
Brunell 12/17 97 yds 1 TD 1 int !!!

Just getting ready to change that
Gameday is running slow

Actually, I think he should have thrown it earlier anyway and let the receiver try to make someone miss and use blockers downfield

I don't think our defense is #1 after half time lol