Page 3 of 6
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:52 pm
by Amberion
Joe has challenged the fumble ruling
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:53 pm
by Scottskins
now that was just plain bad ball handling by Portis. His other fumbles were caused by the defenders, while this one was all portis. How do you fumble that ball%*&*&^&*#@@*&(
And why in heck would you challenge it? I think Gibbs needs to fire that guy he has as a consultant and get me down there. I saw no reason whatsoever to review it...
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:55 pm
by ArmyHog
Now they have great field position off our turnover and we are out of a timeout we will probably need later....where have I seen this before?
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:55 pm
by skinz74
agreed...no reason to challenge that one...another wasted time out. Fire him, Joe...
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:55 pm
by 1niksder
Scottskins wrote:now that was just plain bad ball handling by Portis. His other fumbles were caused by the defenders, while this one was all portis. How do you fumble that ball%*&*&^&*#@@*&(
And why in heck would you challenge it? I think Gibbs needs to fire that guy he has as a consultant and get me down there. I saw no reason whatsoever to review it...
You would obviously would do a beeter job since it wasn't overturned ... 1 timeout gone
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:56 pm
by skinz74
God that play looks familiar...funny how we never learn
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:59 pm
by Scottskins
man, if this offense ever quits putting the defense in such horrible positions, we might actually win a friggin game...
I think this may be the most pissed I've been all season...
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:59 pm
by 1niksder
Browns scoring drive
Cleveland Browns begin at 14:45
1-10-WAS 31 (14:45) J.Garcia pass to S.Heiden to WAS 19 for 12 yards (S.Taylor).
1-10-WAS 19 (13:59) J.Garcia pass to T.Smith to WAS 15 for 4 yards (L.Marshall, S.Springs).
2-6-WAS 15 (13:17) L.Suggs left guard to WAS 15 for no gain (R.Wynn, M.Washington).
3-6-WAS 15 (12:38) J.Garcia pass to A.Shea for 15 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
You can't just give up the ball this deep on your side of the field even against the Browns
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 1:59 pm
by ArmyHog
They need to set Portis down for a series or 2 and let Betts or Rock get in there and get it done. It is not like they can do any worse at this point!
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:02 pm
by ArmyHog
More short yardage that Portis isn't gaining. Get Sellers in there for those situations. The guy is 6'3 and like 260.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:02 pm
by Scottskins
insert sarcasm here, nice block by robert royal...
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:03 pm
by ArmyHog
Portis is down to 3.2 yards per carry today...I hope he kicks it in gear!
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:03 pm
by 1niksder
3 and out running a no hudle ... that should give the D plenty of rest
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:04 pm
by skinz74
Is it the line, or is it Portis...??? Not that I wanna assign blame, but it's tough to watch someone that talented be so ineffective.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:04 pm
by ArmyHog
I thought I read that Royal was inactive today????
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:05 pm
by skinz74
They tried the bootleg again...we got lucky because we were faster...this time..
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:05 pm
by ArmyHog
Time for a Taylor big play!!!
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:06 pm
by skinz74
What the H@LL was that...,?????
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:06 pm
by 1niksder
ArmyHog wrote:I thought I read that Royal was inactive today????
He is must have been Rasby with that great wiff
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:07 pm
by ArmyHog
That is at least 2 int. grounding penalties on Garcia. The D' must be doing good.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:08 pm
by ArmyHog
Good field position.....lets see what they do with it.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:08 pm
by 1niksder
The offense is taking the field and I truly beleive CP shoud set this one out
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:09 pm
by Scottskins
skinz74 wrote:Is it the line, or is it Portis...??? Not that I wanna assign blame, but it's tough to watch someone that talented be so ineffective.
probably a little of both, mebbe leaning a bit more towards the blocking...
ArmyHog wrote:I thought I read that Royal was inactive today????
yeah, looked like 88, but I only got one look and could barely see the number. Musta been Rasby.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:11 pm
by Scottskins
Brunell looked ok early on, but his passes are starting to float now...
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2004 2:11 pm
by ArmyHog
This is frustrating....if they can't give the other team the ball then they get a penalty...what gives?