The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

LOL our injuries are a cop out but blaming the idiot owner for every loss isn't???

Look at non just the starters but the depth we've lost.. From stacked at TE to V Davis and a rookie! Rookie C, rookie rb, backups across the line. Grant Doctson and Harris our WRs... Bro get a grip!

D I even worse! Lost first rounder, lost starting NT, lost 2 starting LBs, dbs in and out...

The fact we are even competitive with teams like Sea and KC and Min should tell you we are far less mismanaged then your stupid signature. Look at the whole picture bro! Smmfh

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:LOL - our injuries are a cop out but blaming the idiot owner for every loss isn't?

I don't blame the idiot owner for any losses at all - not one

Dan Snyder's record as an NFL owner speaks for itself - look it up - that's all I "blame him for"

if you think that someone else is primarily responsible for where this franchise is - please let us know

Snyder is not solely responsible for the lack of a running game, missed tackles, interceptions or bad play calling - the only thing I'm "blaming him for" is that he continues to interfere and has misled and lied to the fans and media about it

In order for this franchise to have a different culture, changes need to be made at the top and while that does not mean that Dan Snyder should sell or leave the franchise, he does need to 'let it go' and be more supportive of those who work for him

Snyder hurts this franchise - good NFL owners help their franchises

Blah blah blah broken record

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Blah blah blah broken record

THANK YOU! I love that you're a little bothered ...

you're right, just like this team, it's the same thing every week - woulda, coulda, shoulda

but wait! 4-6 is not so bad, we can still go 10-6

keep on drinking that cool aid

Well, at least we have now a RB that has rushed for 100 yards or more in a game (Perine). Saints were unstoppable, though.

SkinsJock wrote:

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Blah blah blah broken record

THANK YOU! I love that you're a little bothered ...

you're right, just like this team, it's the same thing every week - woulda, coulda, shoulda

but wait! 4-6 is not so bad, we can still go 10-6

keep on drinking that cool aid

What koolaid?

We are decimated, bro.. Look at dullass minus a lineman and a rb- trash.

We've lost, and continue to lose key players.. Yet we battle the hell out of every team we meet! That in its self should tell you how good we could be.

Ya our owner blah blah... We've been competitive every game and have nearly beat some real contenders.. FACT is, with all the injuries, we aren't one, yet.

there is no doubt that the guys playing and coaching here are doing a fantastic job - there's also little doubt that their win loss record is better than most expected - the problem I have is that each and every season under Dan Snyder is the same - disappointment

looking at each game is one thing - looking at the chances for making the playoffs under this owner's management is another

the injuries had little to do with a decision to both call a pass play AND Kirk Cousins should never have thrown the ball - this was a game that despite the injuries we were up by 15 with 3 minutes to play ... this was a devastating loss

it's true that we are not a bad team, the bigger picture is that this franchise is not as good as it could be because it has not been managed well

I agree that each game shows us a lot but there must be some reason why most knowledgeable NFL fans and the NFL media look at this franchise as being a mess - why is that? the evidence is that the players are playing hard and the coaching is good - why do we not get recognized for that? - because, since 1999, we are "the same old Redskins" - we are looked at as being dysfunctional - WHY IS THAT? - it can't be because of the players or the coaching - they are both better than many franchises - we have that reputation because of Dan Snyder



we can still be 10-6 - but we most likely will not - that's not due to the effort from both players and coaches and it's not just because we've been decimated by injuries - this is who we are ....

no worries, wait till next season - I'll be here .... waiting & watching for those games that we are lucky to win

well managed franchises do not need to get lucky

I guess the question is why can't we find people to replace who's fallen? Eagles get A jai, and blunt.. And we lose 2 rb starters... And bring in rookies and PS players.

At this point we are decimated, in the off season we will be more desirable, but with the long list of injuries, who would want to come here, to win NOW? No one. Thats on the FO?

Not buying that

SkinsJock wrote:why not enjoy what you have? what's the point of speculating that the FO will suddenly start making this franchise better - NOT HAPPENING

Sometimes you just need a good catharsis.

El Mexican wrote:Well, at least we have now a RB that has rushed for 100 yards or more in a game (Perine). Saints were unstoppable, though.

The Defense was 'unstoppable' they couldn't stop anything.

oj wrote:

El Mexican wrote:Well, at least we have now a RB that has rushed for 100 yards or more in a game (Perine). Saints were unstoppable, though.

The Defense was 'unstoppable' they couldn't stop anything.

our first game with a RB getting over a 100 yards AND Kirk Cousins had over 300 yards against a very good defense without our best O line

lets look at some positives here as well PLUS we might have won that game if this had not happened

According to Mike Jones of USA Today, team president Bruce Allen received word from league officials that the devastating intentional grounding on the Redskins' potential game-winning drive was the incorrect call, a penalty that took them out of field goal range. Cousins was sacked on the next play of the game to send it to overtime.

With the Redskins driving, Cousins threw the ball towards the sidelines on a short out route, however a miscommunication between the quarterback and Jamison Crowder saw the ball fall to the turf with no one insight, resulting in the call from the officials. While no one was in the vicinity, the pass wasn't a throwaway, but instead a timing route gone wrong. What should have been third down for the Redskins with a chance to better their field position, instead, turned into another failed game-winning drive.

oj wrote:

El Mexican wrote:Well, at least we have now a RB that has rushed for 100 yards or more in a game (Perine). Saints were unstoppable, though.

The Defense was 'unstoppable' they couldn't stop anything.

Well damn... The officials sure aren't gonna mark the L as a W... Bad calls happen, to us more so

El Mexican wrote:

oj wrote:

El Mexican wrote:Well, at least we have now a RB that has rushed for 100 yards or more in a game (Perine). Saints were unstoppable, though.

The Defense was 'unstoppable' they couldn't stop anything.

With old man Dhall in the backfield, and lacking at least 2 starting LBs a couple DTs and our NT... Not to mention any other DB churn, ie Nicholson at S

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Well damn... The officials sure aren't gonna mark the L as a W... Bad calls happen, to us more so

over the past few seasons, we have had a number of very questionable calls against us - no doubt ...
HOWEVER
IMO, this was just the wrong call - it was not an anti-Redskins call as much as the officials got caught up in the moment and unfortunately not one of them was able to correct the call at the time - they should have discussed it more ... just a bad call - spit happens

Maybe not anti skins as much pro breezy

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Maybe not anti skins as much pro breezy

I feel sorry for those fans who really think that the refs are biased towards players or against certain teams - that's a shame

SkinsJock wrote:

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Maybe not anti skins as much pro breezy

I feel sorry for those fans who really think that the refs are biased towards players or against certain teams - that's a shame

Lmmfao dawg, don't ever feel sorry for me...

Ask any raiders fan about the Tuck rule, and how the NFLs poster child was officiated "fairly"

Lol gtfoh

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:

SkinsJock wrote:

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Maybe not anti skins as much pro breezy

I feel sorry for those fans who really think that the refs are biased towards players or against certain teams - that's a shame

Lmmfao dawg, don't ever feel sorry for me...

Ask any raiders fan about the Tuck rule, and how the NFLs poster child was officiated "fairly"

Lol gtfoh

gtfoh - there have been numerous bad calls and the Redskins fans have to feel that they have been unfairly targeted

I just do not agree that refs are always biased for or against certain players OR for or against certain teams

interesting that the 'NFL's poster child' had to go thru all that BS we knew as deflate gate - why treat your homie like that - gtfoh

you do make it interesting here LOL - lmMFao at ya

I believe if you do stupid stuff to get the ref's attention then you'll eventually get bad calls, if you play a clean game you'll get the benefit of doubt. The key is to not get the refs attention in the first place.

There ya go again bending arguments to fit your agenda..

No one said that every ref nor every call was bias, or even every game..

Brady and deflate gate? Really? If it was any other qb, they'd probably be banned for life!! Lmao

But what ever, your right that stuff don't happen

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote: .. No one said that every ref nor every call was bias, or even every game..

and no one should - it doesn't happen
and
no one really believes that the GOAT needs any help with under inflated balls - that's just stupid
and
the Raiders need to get over it - bad calls happen, nobody's perfect .... well, maybe TB


BOT - looking forward to a lot of yards on the ground and through the air tonight

HTTR - happy thanksgiving

I remember when bad calls happened, that was part of the game and the refs knew they'd made a mistake and they'd find a way to balance out that bad call. Now they can't, Godell is trying to take them out of the game and replace them with automatons. If a ref has a gut feeling he'd made a bad call, a call that bothered him, he can't make a 2nd bad call to balance the first because NY is looking over his shoulder recording every little thing they do and the millisecond they interject a personal decision into the play he'll be removed from service.
The days of refs are numbered.

Mostly with SJ on this one. Refs make bad calls. I doubt they make more against us than they do against any other team over the long haul. Could be wrong.