Page 3 of 3

Re: Clinton Stuff - Positive or Negative - Have at It

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:23 am
by Burgundy&GoldForever
Russia violates 1987 INF Treaty.

Trump's Response: <crickets>

Re: Clinton Stuff - Positive or Negative - Have at It

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:39 am
by Deadskins
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Russia violates 1987 INF Treaty.

Trump's Response: <crickets>
Their planes buzz our ships in the Black Sea, and they plant a spy ship 30 miles off the Connecticut coast. But what can Trump do? They have video of him in a pee party with Russian hookers.

Re: Clinton Stuff - Positive or Negative - Have at It

Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:43 pm
by Countertrey
Deadskins wrote:
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Russia violates 1987 INF Treaty.

Trump's Response: <crickets>
Their planes buzz our ships in the Black Sea, and they plant a spy ship 30 miles off the Connecticut coast. But what can Trump do? They have video of him in a pee party with Russian hookers.
because, they weren't doing this sh1t 6 months ago... smh 'course, that doesn't support your narrative, though...

Re: Clinton Stuff - Positive or Negative - Have at It

Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:06 am
by Deadskins
Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
Burgundy&GoldForever wrote:Russia violates 1987 INF Treaty.

Trump's Response: <crickets>
Their planes buzz our ships in the Black Sea, and they plant a spy ship 30 miles off the Connecticut coast. But what can Trump do? They have video of him in a pee party with Russian hookers.
because, they weren't doing this sh1t 6 months ago... smh 'course, that doesn't support your narrative, though...
Neither does that horrible incident in Sweden a couple of nights ago, huh? :roll:

Re: Clinton Stuff - Positive or Negative - Have at It

Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:15 pm
by Countertrey
Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote: Their planes buzz our ships in the Black Sea, and they plant a spy ship 30 miles off the Connecticut coast. But what can Trump do? They have video of him in a pee party with Russian hookers.
because, they weren't doing this sh1t 6 months ago... smh 'course, that doesn't support your narrative, though...
Neither does that horrible incident in Sweden a couple of nights ago, huh? :roll:
The reference was to the dramatic increase in sexual assault and other violence related to some immigrant groups... you prolly know that, too, but again... that narrative thing...