Page 3 of 5

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 11:41 am
by SkinsJock
I choose to look at where we were before Scot came in and where we are now - this is an amazing transformation ...

Some may think we're in decent shape - I think that Scot knows exactly what needs to happen here and he will get it done

it will take time - many of the starters in 2017 will be a huge surprise

enjoy the ride - we're going up

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 12:33 pm
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:I choose to look at where we were before Scot came in and where we are now - this is an amazing transformation ...

Some may think we're in decent shape - I think that Scot knows exactly what needs to happen here and he will get it done


"Scot is a good GM" is not really an opinion on the state of team depth or anything else.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 2:42 pm
by SkinsJock
riggofan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I choose to look at where we were before Scot came in and where we are now - this is an amazing transformation. Some may think we're in decent shape - I think that Scot knows exactly what needs to happen here and he will get it done
"Scot is a good GM" is not really an opinion on the state of team depth or anything else.

OK - BS (before Scot) we had no plan and very little chance of seeing anything good happening in the foreseeable future ... the roster was not based on anything more than filling out positions and hoping that something good might happen - there was no leadership and no accountability

Both lines were ineffective and there was no depth - none

Scot and the FO have begun the process of rebuilding and they are committed to the draft

we may have some depth but it's a little like the Chesapeake Bay .. it's deep in a very few places and very shallow most everywhere else

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 3:51 pm
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:we may have some depth but it's a little like the Chesapeake Bay .. it's deep in a very few places and very shallow most everywhere else


hah. Pretty much my take as well. I just don't see a lot of positions where I would say we are deep.

I can sort of see Irn Bru's argument though that we have a team full of depth/role players now. And we need to add more elite starters to the mix. If you're looking at it that way, we have great depth!!! :D

If I was betting on the draft, I'd say that Scot will get two quality players in the first/second round. Then maybe trade down a few times after that and snag a couple late round picks.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 4:45 pm
by elprez19
You get depth by drafting starters and in return your previous starters are back ups. Missing our 2 first rounders for the RG3 trade set us back on starting talent. I don't really care if we have 8 or 12 picks honestly because there is no guarantee that the late round picks even make the team. I'd rather have earlier picks and hope the scouts did their homework and get some legitimate talent as opposed to keep trading back and acquiring another 6th or 7th round pick but what do I know. I just know you have to fill your premier positions ( QB, LT, CB, DE, WR, and MLB) with supreme talent to have a chance. We have most of those filled. I think having a player like a Luke Kuechly would take our D to another level and a ball hawk safety/ corner. We need a DL or 2 but i think we could get one in the second round this year since its loaded with them. This is a very intriguing draft and I have no idea what we are going to do and honestly cant wait. Maybe we just draft offense and out score everyone. I'm also intrigued with Michael Thomas who BR said we have rated as the number 1 receiver on our board. I didn't see the Scherff pick last year and I'm sure it'll be the same this year. I think they will draft the best available player on the board regardless of the position if SM sticks to his plan. I don't think we are that far from be a serious team but damn, can we get a superstar on the Defense.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 5:13 pm
by riggofan
elprez19 wrote:You get depth by drafting starters and in return your previous starters are back ups. Missing our 2 first rounders for the RG3 trade set us back on starting talent. I don't really care if we have 8 or 12 picks honestly because there is no guarantee that the late round picks even make the team. I'd rather have earlier picks and hope the scouts did their homework and get some legitimate talent as opposed to keep trading back and acquiring another 6th or 7th round pick but what do I know. I just know you have to fill your premier positions ( QB, LT, CB, DE, WR, and MLB) with supreme talent to have a chance. We have most of those filled. I think having a player like a Luke Kuechly would take our D to another level and a ball hawk safety/ corner. We need a DL or 2 but i think we could get one in the second round this year since its loaded with them. This is a very intriguing draft and I have no idea what we are going to do and honestly cant wait. Maybe we just draft offense and out score everyone. I'm also intrigued with Michael Thomas who BR said we have rated as the number 1 receiver on our board. I didn't see the Scherff pick last year and I'm sure it'll be the same this year. I think they will draft the best available player on the board regardless of the position if SM sticks to his plan. I don't think we are that far from be a serious team but damn, can we get a superstar on the Defense.


I like just about everything you wrote there man. I don't disagree about the late round picks not always making the team. McCloughan's argument though has been he has a better shot at finding a guy in the late rounds when he has more picks to use. Makes perfect sense.

I predicted we would take Scherff last year, but I don't think anyone was really confident about that. Seemed like a true toss up between him and Leonard Williams, and I think he took the player he felt was a sure thing.

Its going to be near impossible to guess who they might take at 21. So many picks ahead of them, and so much could change. I just know that these experts who are saying, "Skins need DL help" and have us picking a DL with the pick are off base. We need more talent on the team period. I feel pretty confident McCloughan is going to make sure we add BPA with that pick.

Personally, I really like this kid from Mississipi State, Chris Jones, the more I read about him.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/ ... id=2555393

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 8:50 pm
by elprez19
riggofan wrote:[ I like just about everything you wrote there man. I don't disagree about the late round picks not always making the team. McCloughan's argument though has been he has a better shot at finding a guy in the late rounds when he has more picks to use. Makes perfect sense.

I predicted we would take Scherff last year, but I don't think anyone was really confident about that. Seemed like a true toss up between him and Leonard Williams, and I think he took the player he felt was a sure thing.

Its going to be near impossible to guess who they might take at 21. So many picks ahead of them, and so much could change. I just know that these experts who are saying, "Skins need DL help" and have us picking a DL with the pick are off base. We need more talent on the team period. I feel pretty confident McCloughan is going to make sure we add BPA with that pick.

Personally, I really like this kid from Mississipi State, Chris Jones, the more I read about him.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/ ... id=2555393


Love the substance here. I also like Chris Jones, he seems to be going in the second round in most mocks. Maybe we could snag him there but don't think he'll be around with our 2nd pick. I would love to be in our war room on draft day. I wish there were a show or something on this a few months after the draft that showed the whole process.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 9:57 am
by SkinsJock
I'd love to have a few 'superstar' players ... maybe just at QB, LT, CB, DE, WR, and MLB - the reality is we don't and the main reason we don't have many great players is that the people that were managing this franchise did not have a clue - thinking that we would have been better off if we had been able to use the picks we gave up for Griffin is just laughable - how in the world can anyone think that the same guys that made that trade, OR the trade for McNabb, were going to suddenly get some brain cells and find a way to help build a successful franchise - that is crazy

Where we are now is amazing considering the mess that was in place here at the end of 2014 - I like the way these guys are managing the franchise and adding the pieces they need - I also think that the way they are doing things is based on their own knowledge and is not 'copying' or trying to do things that have 'worked' for other franchises - this is not Baltimore or the Packers or the Steelers or the Patriots - this is a franchise that has not had a NFL savvy mind in charge for over 15 years - this franchise needs to be totally redone and I like how committed we seem to be to the draft - we do not need superstars, we just need a bunch of good players playing together as a team and these guys will find a way to get that done

we'll be better off if we have a bunch of good solid players playing together than if we have a few superstars all looking for huge contracts

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 12:27 pm
by elprez19
SkinsJock wrote:I'd love to have a few 'superstar' players ... maybe just at QB, LT, CB, DE, WR, and MLB - the reality is we don't and the main reason we don't have many great players is that the people that were managing this franchise did not have a clue - thinking that we would have been better off if we had been able to use the picks we gave up for Griffin is just laughable - how in the world can anyone think that the same guys that made that trade, OR the trade for McNabb, were going to suddenly get some brain cells and find a way to help build a successful franchise - that is crazy

Where we are now is amazing considering the mess that was in place here at the end of 2014 - I like the way these guys are managing the franchise and adding the pieces they need - I also think that the way they are doing things is based on their own knowledge and is not 'copying' or trying to do things that have 'worked' for other franchises - this is not Baltimore or the Packers or the Steelers or the Patriots - this is a franchise that has not had a NFL savvy mind in charge for over 15 years - this franchise needs to be totally redone and I like how committed we seem to be to the draft - we do not need superstars, we just need a bunch of good players playing together as a team and these guys will find a way to get that done

we'll be better off if we have a bunch of good solid players playing together than if we have a few superstars all looking for huge contracts


In general, we have hit on our first round players since I can remember. Those same people did draft Trent Williams, Kerrigan, Moses, Breeland, and also Cousins who I think we all feel pretty good about. I'm pretty sure we would be a better team if we had those first rounders back. Obviously giving those up at the time was worth it when RG3 dominated his rookie year.

Yes we understand that we haven't been the best at drafting but we did make the playoffs last year so I don't think we are as bad off as you think we are. Scott has already transformed this team and has added depth through FA and the draft. We just need to draft more core players, which can be super stars in the first round. He will give the big contracts to superstars, as long as they are our own. Gallete is going to help our D out immensely so that's why I think drafting a shut down CB or playmaker in the secondary would be the best move and then pick up a DL in the 2nd round. What if we had Ezekiel Elliot in our back field? Would you trade a 4th and 6th for Cam Chancellor or would you rather roll the dice that those players drafted turned out to be solid back ups? I know what I would do since I had a taste of the playoffs last year. We couldn't stop GB last year, they were passing all over us. Average solid football players who play together isn't going to prevent that.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 2:01 pm
by riggofan
elprez19 wrote:Love the substance here. I also like Chris Jones, he seems to be going in the second round in most mocks. Maybe we could snag him there but don't think he'll be around with our 2nd pick. I would love to be in our war room on draft day. I wish there were a show or something on this a few months after the draft that showed the whole process.


I'd love to see that show. I know teams want to keep all close to the vest but it would awesome to see. I'm a huge fan of the draft as it is.

I've been wondering some about Ryan Kelly at the #21 pick. Maybe not the obvious pick, but he ticks off a lot of the right boxes. Big guy who can add size. High character, SEC, Alabama team captain.

Seeing the Skins take back to back first round OL would be pretty awesome. I don't know. I really feel like this offense has the potential to explode this year. This line:

Trent/Long/Kelly/Scherff/Moses

Man. We could be in good shape for several years.

Way too early to take a center?

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 2:03 pm
by oj
I'm hopeful Tayler Decker is still available, he's projected to go about the 20th pick but we might get lucky. He's an offensive lineman, most all suggestions and available picks are defensive. What do you guys think? Grab him if available (he'd be BPA I'd think) or go for a defensive guy?

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 3:49 pm
by SkinsJock
I am very sure that these guys are going to continue building by simply adding good players regardless of need ...

gotta love it - cannot have enough good, high character players

I am NOT at all down on the squad we have - younger, bigger and faster


btw - we're the NFC East Champions - we must be favored by everyone to repeat with all these quality players we have ROTFALMAO

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:43 pm
by elprez19
SkinsJock wrote:I am very sure that these guys are going to continue building by simply adding good players regardless of need ...

gotta love it - cannot have enough good, high character players

I am NOT at all down on the squad we have - younger, bigger and faster


btw - we're the NFC East Champions - we must be favored by everyone to repeat with all these quality players we have ROTFALMAO


You keep talking like we didn't have any players before SM got here. Mike Shanahan had some solid drafts also. Where would we be without Cousins and Reed last year? Who even knows how bad we would have been if Cousins started the last 3 years and actually had those 1st round picks back. Shanahan still might have his job if the RG3 scenario didn't happen. RG3 made us look worse than we actually were, that's why we went to playoffs last year. We drafted Scherff who is a solid pick but really with the number 6 pick, we got a guard who didn't make the Pro bowl last year. Matt Jones was a fumble machine and couldn't stay healthy and our run game sucked. Preston Smith is turning out to be the best pick so far. I love the direction we are going, don't get me wrong but lets not crown SM the GM of the decade just yet. I know we are getting younger and bigger, just don't want to miss on some key players just to prove that we can acquire more draft picks.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 10:47 am
by riggofan
elprez19 wrote:Mike Shanahan had some solid drafts also. Where would we be without Cousins and Reed last year?


I hear what you're saying, but not sure I agree about Shanny. He had a bad record of trading away high round draft picks for guys like Jammal Brown, McNabb and Griffin.

He drafted 27 guys over three years. These are the eight guys who are still on the team: Trent, Perry Riley, Kerrigan, LeRib, Cousins, Jordan Reed, Niles Paul and Chris Thompson. Those are good players, but that's a lot of misses in there.

Weird as it is to say, I think Bruce Allen's draft in 2014 is looking OK. He got Murphy, Moses, Long, Breeland and Grant with his first five picks. 5 of 8 players who stuck with the team. Zack Hocker didn't win the job, but he's still kicking in the NFL.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 12:49 pm
by elprez19
riggofan wrote:
elprez19 wrote:Mike Shanahan had some solid drafts also. Where would we be without Cousins and Reed last year?


I hear what you're saying, but not sure I agree about Shanny. He had a bad record of trading away high round draft picks for guys like Jammal Brown, McNabb and Griffin.

He drafted 27 guys over three years. These are the eight guys who are still on the team: Trent, Perry Riley, Kerrigan, LeRib, Cousins, Jordan Reed, Niles Paul and Chris Thompson. Those are good players, but that's a lot of misses in there.

Weird as it is to say, I think Bruce Allen's draft in 2014 is looking OK. He got Murphy, Moses, Long, Breeland and Grant with his first five picks. 5 of 8 players who stuck with the team. Zack Hocker didn't win the job, but he's still kicking in the NFL.


Yeah Shanny wasn't great drafting Defensive players but he did leave us with some high character, corner stone pieces plus Alfred turned out to be OK. I think we could be worse off with all the draft picks we have traded though out the years even though Snyder probably had a lot to do with those. Hopefully Murphy gets moved to DT cause he's not much on rushing the passer. SM bread and butter is probably rounds 2-7, which is good for us. I just wanted to touch on the fact that we had some pretty good players that were drafted before Scott took over. I'm definitely excited about this upcoming draft and cant wait to see what is added. Here is a list of Scotts 1st round history:

Aaron Taylor, G, 19 overall Craig Newsome, DB, 32 overall John Michels, T, 27 overall Ross Verba, T, 30 overall Vonnie Holliday, DE, 19 overall Antuan Edwards, DB, 25 overall Shaun Alexander, RB, 19 overall Chris McIntosh, T, 22 overall Koren Robinson, WR, 9 overall Steve Hutchinson, G, 17 overall Jerramy Stevens, TE, 28 overall Marcus Trufant, DB, 11 overall Marcus Tubbs, DT, 23 overall Alex Smith, QB, 1 overall Vernon Davis, TE, 6 overall Patrick Willis, LB, 11 overall Kentwan Balmer, DT, 29 overall Michael Crabtree, WR, 10 overall James Carpenter, OL, 25 overall Bruce Irvin, DE, 15 overall Brandon Scherff, 5 overall - See more at: http://proplayerinsiders.com/nfl-player ... dbqto.dpuf

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2016 1:39 pm
by SkinsJock
elprez19 wrote: .. You keep talking like we didn't have any players before SM got here ...
WRONG

I'm ONLY pointing out that the way Scot and this FO are running things is what I want to see continue ...

NOTHING GOOD happened here with the way this franchise was managed under Snyder's ownership ... THERE WAS NO PLAN - there are some good players here like Trent but he's not here for much longer ...

we're in a good place now but it's still going to take Scott and this FO a little time to get things sorted

we were a horrible franchise before Scot - HORRIBLE - things have changed dramatically in 1 year

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:41 am
by riggofan
Disappointed to see rape allegations against Shawn Oakman this morning. DE from Baylor. Thought he looked like a possibility for the team, but seems like - so far at least - McCloughan is staying away from those types of players.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:46 am
by SkinsJock
riggofan wrote:Disappointed to see rape allegations against Shawn Oakman this morning. DE from Baylor. Thought he looked like a possibility for the team, but seems like - so far at least - McCloughan is staying away from those types of players.


it really is amazing that so many kids with so much talent can make such bad decisions ...

and I totally agree with not adding players with any sort of character questions at all

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 10:54 am
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:
riggofan wrote:Disappointed to see rape allegations against Shawn Oakman this morning. DE from Baylor. Thought he looked like a possibility for the team, but seems like - so far at least - McCloughan is staying away from those types of players.


it really is amazing that so many kids with so much talent can make such bad decisions ...

and I totally agree with not adding players with any sort of character questions at all


Yeah. I don't want to prejudge him, but your point stands.

Not that some of these young guys won't bounce back from dumb mistakes - God knows we've all done stupid things when we were 19, 20 - but this doesn't seem like a team that can be taking those kinds of risks. Oakman already had a previous issue against him, some sort of altercation that got him booted from Penn State. Doubt we'll be seeing him in b&g now.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:40 am
by OldSchool
I hope the Redskins refrain from drafting guys with character and behavior issues especially involving women. One of the few things the Redskins have done well during the Snyder years is keep a clean roster and I hope SM avoids taking guys with checkered records. You can't expect to build an entire roster of choirboys like Cousins but every guy on the team should come with a record of be a solid citizen in college.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 12:06 pm
by riggofan
OldSchool wrote:I hope the Redskins don't draft guys with character and behavior issues especially involving women. One few things the Redskins have done well during the Snyder years is keep a clean roster and I hope SM avoids taking guys with checkered records. You can't expect to build an entire roster of choirboys like Cousins but every guy on the team should come with a record of be a solid citizen in college.


Yeah we've had enough drama to deal with without that stuff. My thought though was that we can't afford those types of risky moves with our draft picks, especially higher picks. I'm also not sure we have the type of veteran leadership yet on the team that would be needed or willing to straighten guys out.

Too bad though. Looked like a promising player.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:20 am
by DarthMonk
OldSchool wrote:I hope the Redskins don't draft guys with character and behavior issues especially involving women. One few things the Redskins have done well during the Snyder years is keep a clean roster and I hope SM avoids taking guys with checkered records. You can't expect to build an entire roster of choirboys like Cousins but every guy on the team should come with a record of be a solid citizen in college.


Scot McCloughan: Character mattered when picking players

John Keim
ESPN Staff Writer

ASHBURN, Va. -- Washington Redskins general manager Scot McCloughan placed an emphasis on where players came from -- as well as what they did off the field. It formed the foundation of his first draft class with Washington.

He wanted players who were not only good, but also clean off the field. Of the 10 players the Redskins drafted, off-field concerns were not part of their scouting reports.

"The character off the field plays into going from good to great to special," McCloughan said. "Talent’s very, very important. But also the whole package to me is important. That’s what’s going to get the guys to their second contract. That’s what’s going to make us win games in January and February."

They bypassed Nebraska linebacker Randy Gregory. He tested positive for marijuana at the combine and reportedly many teams had other off-field concerns about him. Even though Gregory’s skills would have made him a second-round steal, a source said the Redskins entered the day knowing they would not select him.

"We definitely had many, many discussions about him -- many discussions -- because he is a talented player," McCloughan said. "I don't want to get into the background on him. A lot of it's become public, but that's his stuff. ... Each time we picked, we had a player on the board that fit being a Redskin."

One reason the Redskins drafted Brandon Scherff No. 5 overall was because of that emphasis on character. It mattered, too, that they viewed him as one of the top players on their board, so it wasn’t a reach.

They had considered trading the selection, but McCloughan said the one player teams wanted to trade up for was linebacker Dante Fowler Jr. Once he was gone, the calls from other teams to move up ended.

So they chose Scherff.

"I wanted my first pick to be here, no matter what, somebody that’s not just an impressive player," McCloughan said, "but an impressive person and somebody you can build around. Not only does he come in as a good football player, guys around him will be better because of the way he approaches the game."

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:42 am
by SkinsJock
Thanks DM - IMO we should bring in players that really, really want to play and really, really want to be coached up to play better

a little over a year ago, we were in a huge hole with no way of getting out - this FO has done well but there's a lot of work to be done and it takes a while to develop a winning culture and also to get rid of the losing culture that existed here for over a decade - just adding really great players is not the answer - Snyder tried that, it's certainly not the way to build a successful NFL franchise - this FO seems to understand how important it is to have a lot of very motivated, young players

also - over time, I'd like us to become a franchise that resigns a lot of our own players - we're getting there

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 3:45 pm
by oj
Lets hope the days of Alfred Hainsworth are behind us with lessons learned. talk about one guy disrupting an entire team! Unbelievable.

Re: Draft Targets

Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:41 pm
by SkinsJock
The Redskins were not hurt by the players or the coaches - the ONLY reason this franchise was in such a mess was because of Dan Snyder

Albert Haynesworth was just one of many mistakes that this idiot owner made and he was not the biggest blunder we made either

that's all past tense here - Dan Snyder is not running (or ruining) this franchise any more