Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:22 am
by Redskin in Canada
Wild Card Weekend: Washington Redskins RB Alfred Morris vs. Seattle Seahawks RB Marshawn Lynch
3 out of 5 in NFL Network picked the Skins to win over the Seagirls.
Donovan Mcnab, Bran Billick and Sharp do

, not Brian Baldinger or Marshall Faulk.

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 10:53 am
by DarthMonk
Deadskins wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:The Hogster wrote:One of these was won in a strike shortened year.
Actually two were! And no I can't tell the difference.
Actually, there were two strikes, but only one shortened the season. The other had replacement players playing in three games.
In 1987 we were 11-4. A game was missed. Therefore, both seasons were shortened by strikes.
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:10 pm
by Cappster
I don't get why Faulk said Morris is more valuable just based on the fact of Griffinn being somewhat limited. Did he not see the plays RGIII made with his legs last week against Dallas? RGIII is still an effective runner and still has to be accounted for in the run game or he will still toast you.
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:20 pm
by SkinsJock
We should not be too surprised that we're still not getting much respect BUT ...
We have won the last 7
We do have RG3 AND Alfred Morris
The game is on our field (grass) and that is to our advantage - the Sqwarks like their field turf ...
The Sqwarks record on the road is not great this season
I understand the media does not think we're 'worthy' but I really think they're both NOT giving our guys enough credit + giving too much credit to the Seattle defense
I look for a typical Redskin, down to the wire, win - I'd love to be comfortably ahead but that does not seem to happen a lot with these guys

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:23 pm
by 44diesel
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3bo0zIn ... ata_player
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxlT25mD ... ata_player
Redskin greats Ron McDole and Pat Fisher discuss their experiences with the Redskins and the Super Bowl as well as the Redskins chances in the playoffs.
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:47 pm
by DarthMonk
DarthMonk wrote:I'm wondering of we might try to take advantage of DE Red Bryant who has dealt with a lingering foot injury all year. Their other DE is a platoon of 2 very undersized guys who get good jumps at home. The edges look kinda good right now.
Turns out Seattle's rush defense allows 4.5 ypc which is 23rd in the league (10th worst). We run for an extra yard per carry at home (5.7 to 4.7), easily tops in the league.
They have 36 sacks - 21 at home and 15 on the road.
We have more sacks (36) than Seattle's D and ours are evenly split home and away (16 to 16).
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/splits/_/na ... e-seahawks
I just noticed 16 + 16 = 32
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 2:31 pm
by skinsfan#33
Deadskins wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:Deadskins wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:The Hogster wrote:One of these was won in a strike shortened year.
Actually two were! And no I can't tell the difference.
Actually, there were two strikes, but only one shortened the season. The other had replacement players playing in three games.
Which shortened the season for real NFL players. Sure scabs played three games and I love "the replacements", but the season was shortened three real games. They counted, but they weren't any more real than Seattle's "win" over Green Bay.
Only for the Redskins. Every other team had regular players crossing the picket lines.
For like one game.