Page 3 of 7
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:20 pm
by markshark84
DOGSRBACK wrote:The funny thing is, is I never once said the redskins are a bad team. I enjoy watching them play. I think Morris is great. I watch a lot of Redskins because I really enjoy watching RG3.
Morris is not a better back than TRich, Shannhan has mass produce 1000 yard backs EVERYWHERE HE HAS COACHED. Shurmer might be the worse coach in the NFL. We never have a fullback in the game, and if I know when we are running the ball, gods knows NFL players do. Also there was 2 games he only played about 10 plays becasue of his Ribs
RG3 of course is better than Weeden, but look at the Stats a little closer than you are. Take away first game of the year when he threw 4 picks, also for what its worth he has thrown more yards than RG3
Indy game Gordon dropped the ball in the Sun with less than a Minute, Philly game we had a pick in our hands at the 47 sec mark, Cowbays game PI with less than a minute that lead to game tying Field goal
Look I know the Browns have been the joke of the NFL since they came back, we are the youngest team in the NFL and is playing just as well as the Redskins, its at Cleveland and they will be ready...
you can flip stats anyway you like to make it look better for you. Facts are we are 5-3 in the last 8 games and could have should have been 7-1 we are not, but do not be shocked if the Browns slap the Skins right in the month. The Browns like to hit and they hit hard bye no means are they soft. They have a better Defense than the Ravens. Ravens are I am glad you won.
Aslo KC1 as you like to call him has thrown what 5 passes and you feel good about that. Come on man!!!!!
Crazy thoughts from a delusional Browns fan:
1. Richardson is better than Morris. Although Richardson ranks last in YPC among regularly used backs, is 15th in total yards, has been held to under 50 yards in almost half his games and injured more frequently than a 21 yr old RB should ---- he is still better than Morris who is avging 4.9 YPC, is 5th in total yards, first in yards after contact, has been held to under 50 yards in 1 single game and has rushed for 100 in nearly half. Who cares about production; Richardson was drafted 3rd overall and played at Alabama. So obviously TRich is superior, right???
2. CLE is playing as well as WAS right now. After signature wins against a Roth-less (1-3 record) PIT, perennial NFL powers OAK and KC, CLE is just rolling. WAS has only won 4 straight --- 2 over division opponents and 3 of whom had winning records but who cares. Those are just details.
3. I always use could have should have would have in every scenario. That way I can justify losses to myself and make CLE appear better than they actual are. For what it's worth, if CLE just scored 40 points and held their opponents to 0 in all their games, they would be the best team in the NFL......
4. If Weeden never threw a INT this year and only TDs, he'd win rookie of the year.
5. The 2000 ravens only wish they had CLE's D this year.
6. I could rush 1000 yards if MS were my coach.....
You literally sound crazy. As I said before, there is NOTHING FACTUAL you can provide to support TRich as a better RB than Morris. And the Skins have played and betten MUCH better teams than CLE has over their longer win streak. Get real. Show an ounce of objectivity. You're embarassing yourself.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:38 pm
by The Hogster
DOGSRBACK wrote:The funny thing is, is I never once said the redskins are a bad team. I enjoy watching them play. I think Morris is great. I watch a lot of Redskins because I really enjoy watching RG3.
Morris is not a better back than TRich, Shannhan has mass produce 1000 yard backs EVERYWHERE HE HAS COACHED. Shurmer might be the worse coach in the NFL. We never have a fullback in the game, and if I know when we are running the ball, gods knows NFL players do. Also there was 2 games he only played about 10 plays becasue of his Ribs
RG3 of course is better than Weeden, but look at the Stats a little closer than you are. Take away first game of the year when he threw 4 picks, also for what its worth he has thrown more yards than RG3
Indy game Gordon dropped the ball in the Sun with less than a Minute, Philly game we had a pick in our hands at the 47 sec mark, Cowbays game PI with less than a minute that lead to game tying Field goal
Look I know the Browns have been the joke of the NFL since they came back, we are the youngest team in the NFL and is playing just as well as the Redskins, its at Cleveland and they will be ready...
you can flip stats anyway you like to make it look better for you. Facts are we are 5-3 in the last 8 games and could have should have been 7-1 we are not, but do not be shocked if the Browns slap the Skins right in the month. The Browns like to hit and they hit hard bye no means are they soft. They have a better Defense than the Ravens. Ravens are I am glad you won.
Aslo KC1 as you like to call him has thrown what 5 passes and you feel good about that. Come on man!!!!!
You have hope for the future, but dude get a grip. Your team is not good. You suck actually.
Don't you know that we could play the coulda woulda shoulda game over here and fool ourselves into saying we're actually 10-3. You are who we think you are. The 5-8 Browns. You stink. Sorry.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:44 pm
by DOGSRBACK
Its funny how some of you think you are soooo much better than everyone else
You are 7-6 we are 5-8
you lost to Cincy and Pitt
We beat both of them
you beat the Cowboys, Philly, and Balt
We lost to them
You sound like a Steeler fan that thinks there team is all world, I came on here and gave the Redskins respect but every team has fans that they think there team is the greatest. Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3 and you are blind to think other wise.
I really hope that RG3 plays so when the Browns win there is no excuse on how you lost.
All that counts are wins and yes we beat Steelers with no big ben well the Chargers just slapped them in the face at Pitt and I think the Crappy Clevlenad Browns Beat the Chargers.
If RG3 does not play and we win dont care its a win....Trust me I will be back all week...
Ohh Trich and Morris- Morris has more yards, so that makes him better.... That must mean Weeden is better than RG3 because he has more yards passing...That is what you are saying so ok you win We have better QB you have better RB
FYI look at total yards ass
Morris 1270 with 7 TD
TRich 1220 with 10TD I will give you 50 yards for 3 TDS........
Oops you forgot about the 45 catches TRich has...I hate when I dint look at everything
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:48 pm
by Irn-Bru
DOGSRBACK, please take a moment to read the
site rules. Profanity is not allowed outside the Smack Forum, and neither is profanity with characters in place of letters.
Likewise, personal attacks are not allowed.
Please keep it PG and address only the post (not the person posting), or take it to Smack.
Thanks.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:49 pm
by The Hogster
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:02 am
by Bob 0119
You throw around that "5-3 in the last eight games" line a lot. Have you seen how the Redskins are in the last eight games?
You said we sound like Bengal, Charger, Steeler, Raider and Chiefs fans. Fair enough, but we also sound a lot like Eagle, Cowboy, Giant and Ravens fans. Not only are these four teams responsible for five of your seven losses, but they are also four teams we have beaten in as many weeks.
Now you can come back and point out that you beat the Steelers, who did beat us, but we faced the Ben Roethlisberger-led Steelers where Big Ben had three TDs while you faced the Charlie Batch led Steelers where he had three INTs.
And sure, sure, you can point out you faced the Michael Vick-Led Eagles while we got Nick Foles, but seriously? You guys picked off Vick four times and still found a way to lose.
We are two teams on our own winning streaks, and in our respective 5-3 stretches our opponents combined for a 35-30 record. Yours have a combined 24-36 record. I'd say your record is more inflated than ours.
I'm sure you're feeling awesome after dough-popping Kansas City, but you need to remember...it was Kansas City
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:24 am
by The Hogster
The sad part about this is that only a few franchises have had even less success than us over the last 20 years. And, the Browns are one of them.
We know how you feel buddy, but trust me, you suck and will for a little longer.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:26 am
by The Hogster
You gotta give this guy DOGSRBACK credit. He actually believes this stuff.
He's like this now
He'll be like this Sunday though.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:46 am
by DOGSRBACK
1. Those are great Pics!!!!
2. Is this forum made up of 12 yr olds Please no bad words
3. Whats the Browns vs Redskins head to head record?? I know the answer I am sure you all will give me some BS why the record is 30-10 Browns
4. Already said KC Sucks
5. Dont really care who we beat compared to who you have beat a win is a win
6. RG3 still is your whole team and if he does not play you will get crushed!!! ooh wait you think KC with his career 2 for 7 is worth a 1st round pick LOL
7. You should be a homer I am on your board, but please do not cry and make excusses when you go to Cleveland and get smacked in the mouth.....
8. Only way you win is if the Browns over look the Skins because we have to go to Peytons house the following week and that could get ugly
9. BTW no way you make the playoffs
10. Its a shame you won against Tampa because you had no right to win that game....you won because RG3 again he is your whole team..Nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:28 am
by UK Skins Fan
In the spirit of the original thread title, I'd like to announce that, if one of the wheels falls off my bicycle, I am truly screwed. My unicycling abilities are limited, and I see no way that my life could continue.
I may kill myself.
Then again, I may use a different bike. And the world might be ok after all.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:51 am
by Redskin in Canada
DOGSRBACK wrote:1. Those are great Pics!!!!
There was a time when Skins fans and Browns fans may have been accused of supporting their teams because they were winners.
The truth is that for over nearly TWO DECADES, we are left supporting our teams because we are TRUE FANS. We love our teams EVEN if they win!
So, no disrespect for true passionate fans from me.
AFC North is a tough ladder to climb. You might have had a softer past in some other AFC division but with Pitt, Baltimore and the off and on Marvin Cincinnati, it is a tough place to be. The NFC East, as you have seen this year AGAIN, is no pushover either. So, I look forward to see a more competitive team from Cleveland next year.
I am not going to badmouth anyone but I will tell you WHY I do not feel too bad about our trip to Cleveland this week:
I do not feel that your coaching staff is giving your great RB the best opportunity to shine and your game plans stink. We do not know what Weeden will show up but if bad Weeden shows up and he throws an INT or two, you are done right there.
I hope it is a great game and we look forward to play and score in front of the dog pound. This is the way
our band celebrates after a win in FedEx.
Good luck with your team in the future, Pitt is getting old and Baltimore's top players will not be there much longer either. The AFC North may be a Division up for grabs next year.
Here's to no injuries (particularly your RB and our QB) on either team this Sunday!

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:03 am
by Deadskins
DOGSRBACK wrote:Aslo KC1 as you like to call him has thrown what 5 passes and you feel good about that. Come on man!!!!!
5 passes, two for TDs, though.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:45 am
by Bob 0119
That's a good point RiC.
If there is anyone who knows what it's like to be a Redskins fan, it's a Browns fan. I can respect a true fan who supports his team win or lose especially when we tend to lose more often than we win.
Should be a good game; maybe even better than I had been ready to give it credit for.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:09 am
by Deadskins
DOGSRBACK wrote:Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3
The Browns?
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:43 am
by The Hogster
DOGSRBACK wrote:8. Only way you win is if the Browns over look the Skins because we have to go to Peytons house the following week and that could get ugly
9. BTW no way you make the playoffs
I nominate this comment for Dumbest of All Time.
The Browns may "overlook" the Redskins.
The only thing Cleveland overlooks is a river of floating crap, poverty & delusional fans that are still burning Lebron jerseys.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:45 am
by The Hogster
Hey DOGSRWACK - Post your native message board of struggle. We'll need to find you come Sunday. We know you won't show up around here. We've seen that movie before.
TOO SOON??

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:06 am
by emoses14
The Hogster wrote:Hey DOGSRWACK - Post your native message board of struggle. We'll need to find you come Sunday. We know you won't show up around here. We've seen that movie before.

TOO SOON??

Ooh. That's dirty pool.

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:26 am
by Mississippiskinsfan2
DOGSRBACK wrote:6. RG3 still is your whole team
A whole team of RG3"s

Now that would be something to see right there

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:29 am
by riggofan
Deadskins wrote:DOGSRBACK wrote:Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3
The Browns?
Oh man! Well done.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:37 am
by markshark84
DOGSRBACK wrote:Ohh Trich and Morris- Morris has more yards, so that makes him better.... That must mean Weeden is better than RG3 because he has more yards passing...That is what you are saying so ok you win We have better QB you have better RB
FYI look at total yards ass
Morris 1270 with 7 TD
TRich 1220 with 10TD I will give you 50 yards for 3 TDS........
Oops you forgot about the 45 catches TRich has...I hate when I dint look at everything
Do you really believe this stuff? Are you that delusional?
Trust me, I leave no stone unturned ---- read some of my prior posts. I take everything into account. I thought about it on my initial post (just like I did about the 4 INT performance for Weeden in game 1) -- but decided that catching passes isn't the designated job of a RB. After all Morris is not in on passing downs to keep him fresh, we play Royster as a catch-specfic RB, and this is a discussion on who is the best RB; not WR. I am sure he knows that..... RBs are designed to run. If they drafted him to catch, he would play WR. There's no way this dude doesn't understand that.
Good running backs are ones that RUN THE BALL WELL. TRich just doesn't run the ball well. Morris does. Plain-and-simple here. If you can't take off your blinders and see things objectively, then no one can help you....
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:42 am
by markshark84
DOGSRBACK wrote:5. Dont really care who we beat compared to who you have beat a win is a win
Unless it's a loss in the final 45 seconds of the game right???? Because in your eyes, that sort of counts like a win..........................

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:34 pm
by DarthMonk
markshark84 wrote:DOGSRBACK wrote:5. Dont really care who we beat compared to who you have beat a win is a win
Unless it's a loss in the final 45 seconds of the game right???? Because in your eyes, that sort of counts like a win..........................

Or if they overlook us.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:05 pm
by Countertrey
DOGSRBACK wrote:1. Those are great Pics!!!!
2. Is this forum made up of 12 yr olds Please no bad words3. Whats the Browns vs Redskins head to head record?? I know the answer I am sure you all will give me some BS why the record is 30-10 Browns
4. Already said KC Sucks
5. Dont really care who we beat compared to who you have beat a win is a win
6. RG3 still is your whole team and if he does not play you will get crushed!!! ooh wait you think KC with his career 2 for 7 is worth a 1st round pick LOL
7. You should be a homer I am on your board, but please do not cry and make excusses when you go to Cleveland and get smacked in the mouth.....
8. Only way you win is if the Browns over look the Skins because we have to go to Peytons house the following week and that could get ugly
9. BTW no way you make the playoffs
10. Its a shame you won against Tampa because you had no right to win that game....you won because RG3 again he is your whole team..Nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is
2. Is this forum made up of 12 yr olds Please no bad words
Those are the rules. You don't have to like them... Your Snarky response to Irn-Bru not appreciated. Your attention, otoh, is, and your compliance is expected.
Frankly, I think you've been pretty fair (albeit dead wrong)... and would just as soon continue to read your (very amusing) replies... but, not if you can't obey our rules. This isn't Cleveland. We can all read, our rivers have never caught fire, we actually understand football, and we keep forums other than Smack squeaky clean. Thank you for your kind attention.
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:48 pm
by Countertrey
Actually, my favorite playoff scenario requires that we lose to the Browns...
We lose to the Browns, then win out= 9-7
Giants lose to the Falcons and the Ravens = 9-7.
Dallas loses only to Washington= 9-7...
Redskins Win NFC East on tiebreakers!!!
Seattle wins out, winning West
San Fran loses to NE and Seattle = 10-5-1, wins WC
GB wins out, winning NFC North @12-4
Chicago loses to GB, then wins out, = 10-6, wins WC
Atlanta wins South...
Dallas, NY Giants, and Eagles sit at home and watch the playoffs.
How cool is that?
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:14 am
by Scottskins
If Captain Kirk plays, we will still win!!!