Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:35 pm
by the poster
chiefhog44 wrote:the poster wrote:besides, the most important thing about last night's game is your best offensive player, LT Trent Williams, was hobbling after the game with a foot injury. He said he's allright, but I wouldnt be surprised if he's out next week.
with your offensive line the way it is, you cant lose him. ever. he's all you got.
I totally agree with you. Keep it up.
Hey could you vote for my avator. Thanks man
http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic ... 3&start=45
nah, I don't succumb to the law of reciprocity. nice try though, grifter.
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:46 pm
by DarthMonk
Avator .. admiral job ... where's SLR?
BTW ~
BB 5'7" 150. 4.43 40. 4.29 shuttle.
WW 5'9" 195. 4.65 40. 4.01 shuttle.
Welker is significantly bigger (30% by weight) than Banks, has less pure speed, and a faster change of direction. He's got 21 fumbles in 1,177 touches. Banks has 9 fumbles in 178 touches.
DarthMonk
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:24 pm
by Red_One43
Cousins Pleasantly Surprised with Preseason Debut
Cousins was
9-for-22 with an interception against Buffalo, but he called that stat line a
little “misleading.”
“I think there were a lot of things I did well. I think that the statistics wouldn't reflect having a great game – the completion percentage is below 50 percent, I threw an interception, no touchdowns,” he said. “But when you
break it down play by play I think there were a lot of things that gave me confidence: making quick decisions, being accurate, moving the chains, things that I want to keep doing.”
Cousins said practice is taking on
a different feel as the Redskins get closer to the regular season as he starts to work as a scout team quarterback. While coach
Mike Shanahan wouldn't reveal the order of his QB rotation for Saturday's game at the Chicago Bears after starter Robert Griffin III, Cousins thinks he won't get in until the second half.
Shanahan not revealing the QB rotation - that doesn't mean that Cousins will be elevated to 2nd string, but it does mean that Rex is not solidly number 2 right now. I am predicting that Cousins over takes him in the 4th preason game, if not sooner.
Read more: Kirk Cousins pleasantly surprised with preseason debut - Washington Times
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:12 pm
by emoses14
chiefhog44 wrote:the poster wrote:besides, the most important thing about last night's game is your best offensive player, LT Trent Williams, was hobbling after the game with a foot injury. He said he's allright, but I wouldnt be surprised if he's out next week.
with your offensive line the way it is, you cant lose him. ever. he's all you got.
I totally agree with you. Keep it up.
Hey could you vote for my avator. Thanks man
http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic ... 3&start=45
I don't care who you are, that's funny.
No shame, no shame at all.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:31 pm
by DarthMonk
chiefhog44 wrote: Keep it up.
That's what she said.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:05 pm
by rskin72
Well, seeing as how I was not originally in favor of the Cousins pick.....I am interested in seeing him this weekend, to see if he improves on his performance from last week. As I said before, whiel the stats don't bear it out, there were a lot of positives to be taken from his first performance. As to whether or not he would displace Rex as second string QB, not as sure on that, but it certainly would give our coaching staff an interesting option.....
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:37 pm
by SouthLondonRedskin
DarthMonk wrote:Avator .. admiral job ... where's SLR?
BTW ~
BB 5'7" 150. 4.43 40. 4.29 shuttle.
WW 5'9" 195. 4.65 40. 4.01 shuttle.
Welker is significantly bigger (30% by weight) than Banks, has less pure speed, and a faster change of direction. He's got 21 fumbles in 1,177 touches. Banks has 9 fumbles in 178 touches.
DarthMonk
Did someone call my name...???
Re: So that is the kirk cousins you guys rated high?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:42 pm
by tribeofjudah
funsho2 wrote:9/22 74yards 1int ...bwhahahahaha
wow....we have "the poster"............ now this guy.....

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:14 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
tribeofjudah wrote:funsho2 wrote:9/22 74yards 1int ...bwhahahahaha
wow....we have "the poster"............ now this guy.....

Considering how much drops there was (my boy BB included) and that it was his FIRST ever NFL experience, I'd say he did pretty damn good for a BACKUP.
To give this new troll a little credit, at least he is a puke fan, where as the other troll is just a loud mouthed little girl, who won't admit she's a poop stains fan
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:55 pm
by Red_One43
Kirk Cousins' 8 of 22 fits right in with Cam Newton's 8 of 19 from 2011 in his preseason debut. Statiscally not good, but there are way too many variables in preseason QB stats to determine whether or not the rookie QB will be good during the season. It is great to see Griffin and Luck come out on fire, but they are #1 and #2 picks. Cousins is a 4th rounder. At times he played like a rookie in his first game. That is expected of a 4th round draft pick. At times, he played like a veteran and that is promising.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:26 am
by Deadskins
DarthMonk wrote:chiefhog44 wrote: Keep it up.
That's what she said.
To you, maybe.

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:45 pm
by Hooligan
This is the first season in a long time we've had a backup QB play decent and NOT started a QB controversy. Me gusta.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:56 pm
by 1niksder
Hooligan wrote:This is the first season in a long time we've had a backup QB play decent and NOT started a QB controversy. Me gusta.
But we are heading towards a Backup QB controversy

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:09 pm
by Red_One43
1niksder wrote:Hooligan wrote:This is the first season in a long time we've had a backup QB play decent and NOT started a QB controversy. Me gusta.
But we are heading towards a Backup QB controversy

Do I hear a "Who's Should be the Back Up Poll Coming?"
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:19 pm
by Hooligan
Fair enough. Lets have a challenging poll. Who would you rather have at backup QB? A: Rex Grossman B: Vinny Testaverde
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:39 am
by Skinsfan55
Hmmm, 78% completion percentage last night, 3 TD's... yeah, that's the Kirk Cousins we had rated so high.
Re: So that is the kirk cousins you guys rated high?
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:48 am
by Irn-Bru
funsho2 wrote:So that is the kirk cousins you guys rated high?
9/22 74yards 1int ...bwhahahahaha

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:16 am
by markshark84
Honestly, the preseason doesn't matter.
KC's game vs. CHI was good to see -- but you never know how it will translate. Remember Colt's unreal preseason campaign like 4 or 5 years ago.....
Regardless, the person that started this thread either has no clue about the NFL game or -- much like a 17-year-old girl who lost 25 pounds weeks before prom -- just wants a little attention....
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:03 pm
by 1niksder
markshark84 wrote:Honestly, the preseason doesn't matter.
KC's game vs. CHI was good to see -- but you never know how it will translate. Remember Colt's unreal preseason campaign like 4 or 5 years ago.....
Regardless, the person that started this thread either has no clue about the NFL game AND-- much like a 17-year-old girl who lost 25 pounds weeks before prom -- just wants a little attention....
Fixed it for you

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:55 pm
by SkinsJock
I'd love it if we could only have RGIII and KC on the roster come the first game .....
this would mean that Cousins has clearly shown Mike & Bruce that he can handle the job
I doubt it happens but ...
besides - does anyone really think that Grossman is going to get a job anywhere else

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:57 pm
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:I'd love it if we could only have RGIII and KC on the roster come the first game .....
this would mean that Cousins has clearly shown Mike & Bruce that he can handle the job
I doubt it happens but ...
Still have my fingers crossed. Maybe they can give Rex's spot to Brandon Banks.
