The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

This client SUCKS! I can't find Hog Wild or my team.

DarthMonk wrote:This client SUCKS! I can't find Hog Wild or my team.

Only took 30 mins ... sheesh.

Lotta friction on ESPN.

Thanks Marshall

EDIT: So next season, just use ESPN?

ACW wrote:Thanks Marshall

EDIT: So next season, just use ESPN?

Yahoo= best fantasy football in my limited exp

cowboykillerzRED wrote:

ACW wrote:Thanks Marshall

EDIT: So next season, just use ESPN?

Yahoo= best fantasy football in my limited exp

No doubt.

No prob, ACW. Once I found what I needed I bookmarked.

Yahoo is great, though.

Never used Yahoo; always ESPN, decided to try something new. I'll go back to ESPN next year.

Dominating win it looks like despite Stafford doing jack. Thank you Reggie Bush.

ACW wrote:Dominating win it looks like despite Stafford doing jack. Thank you Reggie Bush.

You should be thanking me for not starting RGIII.

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:Dominating win it looks like despite Stafford doing jack. Thank you Reggie Bush.

You should be thanking me for not starting RGIII.

Nah dude. Even if you had started him and Smith over Moore, I still would've won. Stafford needs to step it up though.

ACW wrote:

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:Dominating win it looks like despite Stafford doing jack. Thank you Reggie Bush.

You should be thanking me for not starting RGIII.

Nah dude. Even if you had started him and Smith over Moore, I still would've won. Stafford needs to step it up though.

You didn't take McGahee into account, though. Still, you won fair and square.

Hey Commish, why do you have FA locks on? You should be able to pick up a FA at any time.

Deadskins wrote:Hey Commish, why do you have FA locks on? You should be able to pick up a FA at any time.

They lock at gametime. All should be open now.

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:Dominating win it looks like despite Stafford doing jack. Thank you Reggie Bush.

You should be thanking me for not starting RGIII.

Nah dude. Even if you had started him and Smith over Moore, I still would've won. Stafford needs to step it up though.

You didn't take McGahee into account, though. Still, you won fair and square.

That is true about McGahee. Who knew though? In my other league, I lost because I started Rodgers over luck (10 vs. 18 points; lost by 2).

ACW wrote:

Deadskins wrote:Hey Commish, why do you have FA locks on? You should be able to pick up a FA at any time.

They lock at gametime. All should be open now.

Yes, I know. I'm saying you should change that setting to no locking on FAs.

Ya but locking em prevents people from grabbing players who do well during a game right away... waiting until the lock was lifted today I added a lot of.players that wouldn't have been there.

cowboykillerzRED wrote:Ya but locking em prevents people from grabbing players who do well during a game right away... waiting until the lock was lifted today I added a lot of.players that wouldn't have been there.

I know. That's the same argument I gave for having at least some waiver period for dropped players, but that gets shot down every time I bring it up. But FAs are just that, Free Agents. They are on the open market and it should be first come, first served. Dropped players, should go through the process, and allow the worst team (or the next in the waiver order) first crack.

Deadskins wrote:

cowboykillerzRED wrote:Ya but locking em prevents people from grabbing players who do well during a game right away... waiting until the lock was lifted today I added a lot of.players that wouldn't have been there.

I know. That's the same argument I gave for having at least some waiver period for dropped players, but that gets shot down every time I bring it up. But FAs are just that, Free Agents. They are on the open market and it should be first come, first served. Dropped players, should go through the process, and allow the worst team (or the next in the waiver order) first crack.

Sounds like "someone" will he a commissioner next year..

I'm already a Commissioner. One league is enough. But I do try to steer my fellow Commishes in the right direction.

Oh come on people, isn't it already enough that I don't require waivers?

ACW wrote:Oh come on people, isn't it already [bad] enough that I don't require waivers?

Yes, and you compound the problem by locking FAs. Free Agents should be free to sign with whoever, and dropped players must clear waivers first. It's standard football.

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:Oh come on people, isn't it already [bad] enough that I don't require waivers?

Yes, and you compound the problem by locking FAs. Free Agents should be free to sign with whoever, and dropped players must clear waivers first. It's standard football.

I actually like this and agree.

Well, you know what, it's my league, and if you don't like it...


I apolotgize and will try to do better next time

(Though I DO believe I asked everyone to look at the rules before the draft...).

ACW wrote:(Though I DO believe I asked everyone to look at the rules before the draft...).

I did look at the scoring, and proposed changes, which you made. I didn't really look at the waiver/ FA thing though. I'm not sure I would have noticed the FA lock though, having never played the NFL's FF before. It's not too late to make the change if the majority of the owners vote for it.

Deadskins wrote:

ACW wrote:(Though I DO believe I asked everyone to look at the rules before the draft...).

I did look at the scoring, and proposed changes, which you made. I didn't really look at the waiver/ FA thing though. I'm not sure I would have noticed the FA lock though, having never played the NFL's FF before. It's not too late to make the change if the majority of the owners vote for it.

Alright, let's vote. I'll put the poll up (keeping the no waivers though).

Jus keep it... Might as well get used to a different way of doing things I say