Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:14 pm
Like we do with yours.SkinsJock wrote:mostly, I just glance at it or speed read and confirm that it's the same drivel

Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Like we do with yours.SkinsJock wrote:mostly, I just glance at it or speed read and confirm that it's the same drivel
I also skip them. They are just a waste of electrons.langleyparkjoe wrote:Does anyone else just skip over that guy's postings or just me?
+1langleyparkjoe wrote:Does anyone else just skip over that guy's postings or just me?
The only difference is Mini Camp is mandatory and OTAs are not.SkinsJock wrote:thanks - for the record - what's the difference between OTAs & Minicamp?1niksder wrote:The last week of OTAs started today.... June 4-7andyjens89 wrote:Any more updates on OTAs or have they concluded?
Minicamp will be from June 11 to June 14
thankfully it's June already
http://seattle.sbnation.com/2012/4/16/2 ... nce-monday(iii) Phase Three. Phase Three shall consist of the next four weeks of the Club's offseason workout program ... during Phase Three each Club may conduct a total of ten days of organized team practice activity ("OTAs" or "OTA days") ... The Club may conduct a maximum of three days of OTAs during each of the first two weeks of Phase Three.
A maximum of four days of OTAs may be conducted during either the third week or the fourth week of Phase Three, with the Mandatory Veteran Minicamp (Article 22, Section 2) to be held during the other week. During weeks in which the Club conducts only three days of OTAs, the Club may also conduct a fourth day of non-OTA workouts ... During Phase Three, all coaches shall be allowed on the field.
No live contact is permitted. No one-on-one offense vs. defense drills are permitted (i.e., no offensive linemen vs. defensive linemen pass rush or pass protection drills, no wide receivers vs.defensive backs bump-and-run drills, and no one-on-one special teams drills involving both offense and defense are permitted). Special teams drills (e.g., kicking team vs. return team) are permitted, provided no live contact occurs. Team offense vs. team defense drills, including all drills listed in Appendix G to this Agreement, are permitted, provided no live contact occurs. Clubs may require players to wear helmets; no shells are permit ted during Phase Three of the Club's offseason workout program or any minicamp.
Countertrey wrote:You don't get it. She doesn't care. She doesn't care if you are an optimist. She doesn't care if you are a pessimist. She doesn't care about anything except getting a rise... from YOU... or anyone else. DFTTmarkshark84 wrote:I think that everyone on this site would not consider me a rose-colored glass fan -- far from it. But you are really just looking for stuff to complain about. Trust me, I hate Snyder. I wish he would sell the team. I can't express that enough. But, I'm not sure your facts are totally straight. In particular with Manning.the poster wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ear ... _blog.html
In terms of him doing what the customers want -- I wish that were true. For over a decade he has traded away picks for aging vets for huge contracts. I think that Snyder does what he wants while grossly lacking the football mind to do it -- and that is why we are in this mess.
As far as this offseason being similar to last years -- I don't agree. RGIII was drafted. Sure they traded picks away, but at least it was for picks and not aging vets as in the past. I can understand the similarity in that he traded away picks for something, but this is a very unique situation in that RGIII may very well be a franchise QB. Would you trade away 2 firsts and a second for a 23 year old Tom Brady???? I think everyone would -- and the skins are willing to trade it for the chance at that. It's a risk, but so is almost every pick in the draft. Do I think that they spent too much -- right now I do BUT if he works out as planned, it will be the steal of the draft.
As far as the whole next exciting thing -- that is WAY off. If he were to do that he wouldn't have drafted a rookie, a rookie that needs to be trained and will take time to develop. He would have gone out and gotten big name vet and not a rookie. Say what you want, but I honestly don't think our FO is being run by Snyder right now. I believe trade was completed by Allen and MS.
I consider myself a fairly big pessimist compared to most on this board, but you are at a whole different level. You're just a troll.
It's unfortunete but accurate. For example, the poster gives me 5 articles -- all of which come from the same verifiably inaccurate source. A source which has neither connections nor relationships with either organization. Additionally, the articles predate the one I provided (which have FIRST PERSON quotes). If the quote by Russell were remotely accurate Peyton wouldn't have gone to Denver (because it's cold), would have inevitably ended up in Miami (because that is where the "source" states his intentions are), and he wouldn't have met with MS in Denver 3 weeks after all of these articles were "published" (because MS wouldn't have wanted to waste his time).skinpride1 wrote:Countertrey wrote:You don't get it. She doesn't care. She doesn't care if you are an optimist. She doesn't care if you are a pessimist. She doesn't care about anything except getting a rise... from YOU... or anyone else. DFTTmarkshark84 wrote: I think that everyone on this site would not consider me a rose-colored glass fan -- far from it. But you are really just looking for stuff to complain about. Trust me, I hate Snyder. I wish he would sell the team. I can't express that enough. But, I'm not sure your facts are totally straight. In particular with Manning.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ear ... _blog.html
In terms of him doing what the customers want -- I wish that were true. For over a decade he has traded away picks for aging vets for huge contracts. I think that Snyder does what he wants while grossly lacking the football mind to do it -- and that is why we are in this mess.
As far as this offseason being similar to last years -- I don't agree. RGIII was drafted. Sure they traded picks away, but at least it was for picks and not aging vets as in the past. I can understand the similarity in that he traded away picks for something, but this is a very unique situation in that RGIII may very well be a franchise QB. Would you trade away 2 firsts and a second for a 23 year old Tom Brady???? I think everyone would -- and the skins are willing to trade it for the chance at that. It's a risk, but so is almost every pick in the draft. Do I think that they spent too much -- right now I do BUT if he works out as planned, it will be the steal of the draft.
As far as the whole next exciting thing -- that is WAY off. If he were to do that he wouldn't have drafted a rookie, a rookie that needs to be trained and will take time to develop. He would have gone out and gotten big name vet and not a rookie. Say what you want, but I honestly don't think our FO is being run by Snyder right now. I believe trade was completed by Allen and MS.
I consider myself a fairly big pessimist compared to most on this board, but you are at a whole different level. You're just a troll.
I have to give you some credit Countertrey...that was brillant !!!! I almost peed my pants when I seen the horse dung for a quote. I needed a good laugh for the day...thanks man.
Click through to read the full blog.Hightower is taking some handoffs and running and doing some cutting. He probably couldn't suit up today but he is looking pretty spry.
Hankerson running some patterns. Not quite in sync with RG3 on a few throws.
RG3 is occasionally double clutching, like he isn’t quite sure of what he’s seeing from the defense.
Hankerson was a spectator during 11 on 11.
Practice was stopped briefly after there were issues like jumping offside a few times in the course of several plays. All of the players huddled up in the middle of the field with Shanahan in the middle.
Rex heaved a wounded duck to Niles Paul, who was open down the sideline. Paul made the catch but a starting NFL defensive back would have knocked it down or picked it off.
With Graham Gano’s recovery from a back injury coming along well, the kicking duel started in earnest. Neil Rackers gets great height on his field goal attempts and it appears that Gano’s travel farther.
Kirk Cousins is showing some arm with a laser to a tight end over the middle.
If Rex does have to come in and play, the playbook will have to be tweaked substantially. He never looked very fast rolling out but after watching RG3 on the move and the watching him, well, they’re not on the same planet.
Have to say that with 90 players a lot of them do a lot of watching. Hard for a guy like Lance Lewis to get a good shot when he is spending so much time on the sideline.
NT Chris Baker shouts an expletive after missing a play. Again, guys like him get so few chances that one mistake can do substantial damage.
We get good Rex/bad Rex in practice, too. He had some great touch on a fade that dropped right into Paul’s arms in the end zone.
Who cares about hang time on a FG attempt?Neil Rackers gets great height on his field goal attempts and it appears that Gano’s travel farther.
I'm no expert on field goal kicking, but isn't height also associated with avoiding blocks?Deadskins wrote:Who cares about hang time on a FG attempt?Neil Rackers gets great height on his field goal attempts and it appears that Gano’s travel farther.
Irn-Bru wrote:I'm no expert on field goal kicking, but isn't height also associated with avoiding blocks?Deadskins wrote:Who cares about hang time on a FG attempt?Neil Rackers gets great height on his field goal attempts and it appears that Gano’s travel farther.
Do people still say, "WORD"?SkinsJock wrote:Accuracy is paramount for FGs
height/hang time plus accuracy would be good on kickoffs
I just love that we're having competition at this position - hopefully we get a better kicker out of it
Maybe in the first 6 feet. After that, it only has to clear the crossbar. I'll take the kicker who can kick the ball farther over one who kicks it higher.Irn-Bru wrote:I'm no expert on field goal kicking, but isn't height also associated with avoiding blocks?Deadskins wrote:Who cares about hang time on a FG attempt?Neil Rackers gets great height on his field goal attempts and it appears that Gano’s travel farther.
skinpride1 wrote:Did anyone catch this.....
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8 ... tl_sessler
The arm is rocking!!!!
And yet, you do it anyway?skinpride1 wrote:Sorry I don't want to play lets feed the troll.
Wrong.... I never answered his question or said his name. I only put the hammer down... that's not feeding, thats humilation of the troll. Some say ignore ...I say put them in there place.Deadskins wrote:And yet, you do it anyway?skinpride1 wrote:Sorry I don't want to play lets feed the troll.
skinpride1 wrote:Wrong.... I never answered his question or said his name. I only put the hammer down... that's not feeding, thats humilation of the troll. Some say ignore ...I say put them in there place.Deadskins wrote:And yet, you do it anyway?skinpride1 wrote:Sorry I don't want to play lets feed the troll.
Wow... guess you told her... she'll never come back now...skinpride1 wrote:Wrong.... I never answered his question or said his name. I only put the hammer down... that's not feeding, thats humilation of the troll. Some say ignore ...I say put them in there place.Deadskins wrote:And yet, you do it anyway?skinpride1 wrote:Sorry I don't want to play lets feed the troll.