Why Can't We Find Gems In The 3rd Round

[SkinsJock]

^^^ Just another man's opinion .... but


there is no way that Snyder is ANY part of all that is happening here

Snyder has shown how inept he is at managing - AND this has been VERY obvious for over 10 years

we are now in a position to draft, quite possibly, the best Redskins' QB ... EVER

THERE IS NO WAY that Snyder is any part of that process

[the poster]

Let me correct something. Of you give up a future 2nd round pick for a current year 3rd. The pick either cost you a 3rd or a future 2nd.

not surprising, but you're wrong. i clearly stated the redskins used two picks to draft cooley.

(1) the 2nd rounder they gave up to acquire (2) THE PICK THAT THEY USED TO TAKE COOLEY (3rd rounder, 2004).

[SkinsJock]

am I the only poster here that could give a rat's orifice about what this guy posts

what a load of BS

[the poster]

Bruce & Mike have made mistakes but they have put this franchise in a position to add a GREAT QB

interesting way to phrase that. and you're obviously allowing yourself to dream and take one liberty because apparently Rg3 is a "GREAT QB"

I know this is tough for redskin fans to hear, especially we're are smack in the middle of your favorite part of the year....but let's let him prove it on an NFL field first........

the other part though, "put this franchise in position"

Well, first of all, the only way the two of them could do that is by LOSING A LOT OF GAMES and being near the top of the draft......so kudos to allen and shanahan for their superior ability to field and command a losing team.

But beyond that.......put into position?

You know...you could "put your family into position" to own a Ferrari too, just take out a second mortage on the house. Thats what they've done....we'll see how this las vegas wager works out for them.....i know the skins history....we'll see.......

[emoses14]

am I the only poster here that could give a rat's orifice about what this guy posts

what a load of BS

No, you aren't.

[skinsfan#33]

Let me correct something. Of you give up a future 2nd round pick for a current year 3rd. The pick either cost you a 3rd or a future 2nd.

not surprising, but you're wrong. i clearly stated the redskins used two picks to draft cooley.

(1) the 2nd rounder they gave up to acquire (2) THE PICK THAT THEY USED TO TAKE COOLEY (3rd rounder, 2004).

Now you're flat out wrong. They used a 3rd rounder that they didn't have to get ey. To get that 3rd they had to give up a future second. So you can claim he cost a 3rd or a 2nd, but not both.

Think of of this way, if you go to Target in Cleveland to buy your adult diapers, but don't have the $10 dollars in your pocket you might use your credit card. The cost of your diapers right then is $10. If you can't pay your credit card until the following year because your welfare check doesn't give you enough money and you incur a total bill of $15 ($10 plus $5 in INT) you could claim your diapers cost you $10 OR $15, but you certainly can't say they cost $25!

THAT IS WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO, by saying ey cost is a third and second!

[Deadskins]

Code: Select all

         \|||/       
         (o o)       
,----ooO--(_)-------.
| Please            |
|   don't feed the  |
|     TROLL's !     |
'--------------Ooo--'
        |__|__|      
         || ||       
        ooO Ooo      

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No matter how witty your response is.

[the poster]

[quote="skinsfan#33]
Now you're flat out wrong. They used a 3rd rounder that they didn't have to get ey. To get that 3rd they had to give up a future second. So you can claim he cost a 3rd or a 2nd, but not both.[/quote]

what am I missing here? and like 99.999999 of people of message boards across the world, I admit when Im wrong, but Im struggling to see what you're saying.

So, like I said before, they ALLOCATED two draft picks to getting ey.

Same applies to modern times here with RG3. To get RG3 on their roster, they allocated four draft picks on him.

I UNDERSTAND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ACTUALLY USED TO LITERALLY SELECT HIM but the other 3 picks are required in order to be in a position to select him. Those picks are no longer the property of the redskins so, ergo, 4 draft picks are allocated to RG3.

same principle to Chris ey...yes, I know they actually physically drafted ey with a 3rd round pick but a 2nd round pick was USED UP in order to acquire the 3rd round pick to draft cooley.

If it wasnt, mister, then you would have had that second round pick to draft another guy in addition to cooley.

what am I missing here?

[1niksder]

[quote="skinsfan#33]
Now you're flat out wrong. They used a 3rd rounder that they didn't have to get ey. To get that 3rd they had to give up a future second. So you can claim he cost a 3rd or a 2nd, but not both.[/quote]

what am I missing here? and like 99.999999 of people of message boards across the world, I admit when Im wrong, but Im struggling to see what you're saying.

So, like I said before, they ALLOCATED two draft picks to getting ey.

Same applies to modern times here with RG3. To get RG3 on their roster, they allocated four draft picks on him.

I UNDERSTAND ONLY ONE OF THEM IS ACTUALLY USED TO LITERALLY SELECT HIM but the other 3 picks are required in order to be in a position to select him. Those picks are no longer the property of the redskins so, ergo, 4 draft picks are allocated to RG3.

same principle to Chris ey...yes, I know they actually physically drafted ey with a 3rd round pick but a 2nd round pick was USED UP in order to acquire the 3rd round pick to draft cooley.

If it wasnt, mister, then you would have had that second round pick to draft another guy in addition to cooley.

what am I missing here?[/QUOTE]

Other than the ability to properly quote? Let's see

ey was selected with a third round pick in a draft where the Redskins didn't have a third round pick. Washington gave up a future pick to get a pick they could use on ey, that's notusing two picks takes trade one pick for one pick. The GoDaHell hasn't come up with a way to charge the Skins two picks for one player yet. So it cost them a third round pick OR a future 2nd round pick to get him NOT both

[Irn-Bru]

Other than the ability to properly quote?

That ended up being a bit ironic.

[DarthMonk]

Other than the ability to properly quote?

That ended up being a bit ironic.

I took it as clever.

Let's see. Before the 'Skins picked ey they had a 2nd round pick. After they picked ey they didn't. Sounds like he cost them a 2nd rounder.

Now if they had traded a 2nd and 3rd for the pick they used to select him ...

poster: Your dog won't sit unless you give him a dog bone. You don't have one but you can buy one for a dollar. You buy one. Your dog sits. His sitting cost you a dollar.

If you can't understand that then your posts lose all credibility they never had.

DarthMonk

[Deadskins]

Other than the ability to properly quote?

That ended up being a bit ironic.

I was going to post something similar, but decided to give 1nik time to fix his own post, and didn't want to even acknowledge feeding of the troll.

[Irn-Bru]

Aha, but have you now acknowledged it? Only 3 degrees of separation!

[Deadskins]

No.

[DarthMonk]

No.

+ e to the (i)(pi) + 1



DarthMonk

[Deadskins]

Math majors. Sheesh!