Page 3 of 5
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:47 pm
by CanesSkins26
skinpride1 wrote:Sure seems the zebras always find a way to screw us. Didn't show the replay call on moss but I'm fine with that if refs call it fair on all teams but they don't
If anything, we got more favorable calls than the Pats. The roughing the passer call on Carter that negated a horrible int by Rex. The joke of an unnecessary roughness penalty on Wilfork. The refs were horrible yesterday but it was bad going both ways.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:57 pm
by CanesSkins26
What's frustrating about this game is our complete inability to play well in all facets at the same time. The offense, despite injuries and some dumb decisions by Rex, actually played very well. Yet with the offense playing well our defense literally threw up all over themselves.
Our secondary is god awful....Wilson has been rather disappointing, Hall is awful, Otogwe hasn't been anywhere near the play maker we expected.
And where is Orakpo? 1.5 sacks in the last 7 games. Other than the 2.5 sacks he had against the Rams he's been INVISIBLE this season and that's unacceptable for a player drafted in the top half of the first round in his 3rd season. He is literally getting worse as he goes along.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:17 pm
by PAPDOG67
CanesSkins26 wrote:What's frustrating about this game is our complete inability to play well in all facets at the same time. The offense, despite injuries and some dumb decisions by Rex, actually played very well. Yet with the offense playing well our defense literally threw up all over themselves.
Our secondary is god awful....Wilson has been rather disappointing, Hall is awful, Otogwe hasn't been anywhere near the play maker we expected.
And where is Orakpo? 1.5 sacks in the last 7 games. Other than the 2.5 sacks he had against the Rams he's been INVISIBLE this season and that's unacceptable for a player drafted in the top half of the first round in his 3rd season. He is literally getting worse as he goes along.
Well we know where Orakpo is...He's busy filming Geico commercials.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:45 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
tribeofjudah wrote:haven't read all the posts but Who was standing around why Gronk was shedding tackles on the sideline....???
PAAAAHHHHLEEEZZZZ.....give me a break. Gang tackle, everyone to the ball carrier.
That guy should be demoted.
In all honesty, the play looked over at that point. With the way the refs throw flags for Unnecessary Roughness, I can't get too upset with DHall for not wanting to pile on. Seriously, look at Fletcher's penalty. it was complete BS, but the refs favor certain teams. Had DHall put a shoulder into Gronk -- or better yet had LL been on the field and laid him out -- would we have gotten a flag? Who knows?
Look at the Brady scramble AFTER the Fletcher penalty. The league wants to hamstring defenses. It's pure BS.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 4:27 pm
by CanesSkins26
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:haven't read all the posts but Who was standing around why Gronk was shedding tackles on the sideline....???
PAAAAHHHHLEEEZZZZ.....give me a break. Gang tackle, everyone to the ball carrier.
That guy should be demoted.
In all honesty, the play looked over at that point. With the way the refs throw flags for Unnecessary Roughness, I can't get too upset with DHall for not wanting to pile on. Seriously, look at Fletcher's penalty. it was complete BS, but the refs favor certain teams. Had DHall put a shoulder into Gronk -- or better yet had LL been on the field and laid him out -- would we have gotten a flag? Who knows?
Look at the Brady scramble AFTER the Fletcher penalty. The league wants to hamstring defenses. It's pure BS.
Shanahan doesn't agree. He called that play "disappointing" and said that Hall was "embarrassed".
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:29 pm
by StorminMormon86
Redskins_Fanatic wrote:Yes, that WAS a terrible Patriots team they played yesterday. That team has ONE offensive weapon of any significance - #87 Gronkowski.
Are you forgetting about Wes Welker or Hernandez?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:34 pm
by Kilmer72
Irn-Bru wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:The INT I can't blame on Rex, but I don't understand why he was even throwing to Moss in the first place...he was 5 yards away from the endzone.
It was 2 down territory. Moss probably would have fallen at about the 4 from where he had his hands on the ball. An incomplete attempt into the end zone and it's 4th and goal from the . . . wherever we were, I think the 9 or 10?
But then again, we wouldn't have been pushed back if it weren't for Moss's stupid penalty in the endzone. EVERYONE stepped up on offense today. The defense, not so much. Can we fire DeAngelo Hall NOW?! He wears a big "C" on his jersey for a reason. He's supposed to be a leader, not a four year old immature thug. And why was he just standing there when Gomes and Doughty were struggling to tackle Gronkowski?
Agreed. Although I'm not so sure Moss's penalty was a stupid one. I didn't get to see a replay (thanks, CBS, for your awesome coverage of the game's pivotal moment!), but Moss was adamant after the game that there was nothing in it.
Obviously the player is going to see things from a more one-sided perspective, but until I can see the foul I'm going to give the Redskin the benefit of the doubt — especially on a penalty that is not called very often and is often highly questionable.
Here is the replay
http://www.twitvid.com/73GEZ
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:44 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
It was a flop on Edelman's part. Clear and simple.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 5:54 pm
by tribeofjudah
CanesSkins26 wrote:Burgundy&Wha? wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:haven't read all the posts but Who was standing around why Gronk was shedding tackles on the sideline....???
PAAAAHHHHLEEEZZZZ.....give me a break. Gang tackle, everyone to the ball carrier.
That guy should be demoted.
In all honesty, the play looked over at that point. With the way the refs throw flags for Unnecessary Roughness, I can't get too upset with DHall for not wanting to pile on. Seriously, look at Fletcher's penalty. it was complete BS, but the refs favor certain teams. Had DHall put a shoulder into Gronk -- or better yet had LL been on the field and laid him out -- would we have gotten a flag? Who knows?
Look at the Brady scramble AFTER the Fletcher penalty. The league wants to hamstring defenses. It's pure BS.
Shanahan doesn't agree. He called that play "disappointing" and said that Hall was "embarrassed".
Yup...don't have to pile on and hurt the guy....just wrap his legs or feet up or push him OUT....for crying out loud.....!!!
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:39 pm
by Red_One43
mastdark81 wrote:Red_One43 wrote:mastdark81 wrote:Red_One43 wrote:I was at the game so I am just now looking at the highlights on NFL.com.
On the Gronkowski long run that led to their second TD. Gomes and Doughty clearly blew that tackle, but Hall just stood there and didn't help and then he turned his back while Gomes and Doughty struggled to bring him down.
Not sure that guys with that kind of effort in a game need to be on the roster next year. Is that that kind of play we want from our veterans?
I think everyone in the game and everyone watching thought the guy was going to be tackled out of bounds. Its easy to look in hindsight and think he should have piled on. In fact you can pick every play of the game and see someone not piling on each play...fluke play with poor tackling.
Hall throwing the flag is what is unacceptable.
You go until the whistle is blown. THAT is fundamental football. Teams that when Super Bowls do not have their captains turning their backs on a live play.
"Piling on" are your words. No one said, "pile on," but you. Hall should have at least got in position should Gronk have gotten loose to tackle him or have done one of his patented ball strips - and speaking of ball strips? You have the question why this playmaking ball stripper didn't have the DESIRE to go after the ball on this play. YOU play to win the game! In Hall's case, it wasn't even "poor tackling" It was lack of effort. "Fluke" play? - poor tackling does not consitute a "fluke" play. It is what it is - poor tackling and that is not playing to win the game.
My point is anger should be directed to the two players that CAN'T TACKLE one guy then a guy that just happen to be standing near them. Thats a fluke play you don't see that too often happening in the NFL, can't blame Hall on that. I'm sure if he wasn't inches near the out of bounds line he would have helped tackle.
Where's the blame on Kerrigan for letting slow Tom Brady slip through his grasp and complete a big play? Or Logan Paulson's false start? Riiiiiight.
So if he would have dived onto the guy guess what probably would have been called in this day and age of football "LATE HIT". Then yall would be complaining that Hall had no reason to hit a guy as he was going out of bounds. Attacks on Hall have been little bit too much lately when you have an entire team that struggles. I think it is PERSONAL.
He made some big plays as well in the game and I remember him coming up and supporting the run a few times pretty good. Now if he could do it again I'm sure he would have helped out. The guy is just frustrated with losing like he should be. I'd rather see someone like that than a player that don't give 2 ish.
Just say you mad we lost the game and continue to be a losing team and you don't like HALL...instead of nitpicking every lil error he makes.
Collectively we haven't played well this year.
You play til the Whistle is blown!!! FUNDAMENTAL FOOTBALL whether your your name is Smith or Hall! That is what this is about!
But wait! Wasn't Shanny asked about this "fluke" play during his presser today? He could have declined to say anything about Hall, but he chose to say that he was disappointed that Hall walked away from a live play.
Defend Hall all you want. From your perspective, he doesn't derserve it and that is fine, but I perfer that the Redskin captains be guys like London Fletcher and guys like Kerrigan who at least tried to tackle Gronk instead of walking away. And do you know what, from what Shanny said today, I think that at the end of the season, he might be agreeing with me.
I leave you with this quote:
“I can’t point a finger at anybody but myself. The way I’m playing right now, they need to go and cut me, because I’m definitely not worth what I’m getting. It’s frustrating,”
Yeah, some angry guy said that! Some Angry guy named DeAngelo Hall That my friend, is PERSONAL!
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:04 pm
by CanesSkins26
It would be one thing if this was a one-time thing for Hall, but it's not. I can't remember what game it was last year, but he had a chance to put a hit on a player about to go into the end zone and didn't do it. This is also the same guy that got owned by Jake Delhomme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE7ZBTvrtIA
I don't think that he'll do it, but if I was Shanahan I would strip Hall of his captaincy and bench him for next week. Not only for that lack of effort, but for that idiotic penalty when he threw the referee's flag. This guy is a captain and more often than not he acts like a jerk on the field.
It would also be one thing if he was effective, but he's not. He's never been a good cover corner, but in the past he at least made big plays that made up for his shoddy coverage skills, but this year he isn't even doing that.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:16 pm
by Red_One43
CanesSkins26 wrote:It would be one thing if this was a one-time thing for Hall, but it's not. I can't remember what game it was last year, but he had a chance to put a hit on a player about to go into the end zone and didn't do it. This is also the same guy that got owned by Jake Delhomme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE7ZBTvrtIAI don't think that he'll do it, but if I was Shanahan I would strip Hall of his captaincy and bench him for next week. Not only for that lack of effort, but for that idiotic penalty when he three the referee's flag. This guy is a captain and more often than not he acts like a jerk on the field.
It would also be one thing if he was effective, but he's not. He's never been a good cover corner, but in the past he at least made big plays that made up for his shoddy coverage skills, but this year he isn't even doing that.
+1
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:21 pm
by Red_One43
tribeofjudah wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:Burgundy&Wha? wrote:tribeofjudah wrote:haven't read all the posts but Who was standing around why Gronk was shedding tackles on the sideline....???
PAAAAHHHHLEEEZZZZ.....give me a break. Gang tackle, everyone to the ball carrier.
That guy should be demoted.
In all honesty, the play looked over at that point. With the way the refs throw flags for Unnecessary Roughness, I can't get too upset with DHall for not wanting to pile on. Seriously, look at Fletcher's penalty. it was complete BS, but the refs favor certain teams. Had DHall put a shoulder into Gronk -- or better yet had LL been on the field and laid him out -- would we have gotten a flag? Who knows?
Look at the Brady scramble AFTER the Fletcher penalty. The league wants to hamstring defenses. It's pure BS.
Shanahan doesn't agree. He called that play "disappointing" and said that Hall was "embarrassed".
Yup...don't have to pile on and hurt the guy....just wrap his legs or feet up or push him OUT....for crying out loud.....!!!
Or do the famous Hall strip!!! Since when does Hall pile on?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:29 pm
by Red_One43
Kilmer72 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:The INT I can't blame on Rex, but I don't understand why he was even throwing to Moss in the first place...he was 5 yards away from the endzone.
It was 2 down territory. Moss probably would have fallen at about the 4 from where he had his hands on the ball. An incomplete attempt into the end zone and it's 4th and goal from the . . . wherever we were, I think the 9 or 10?
But then again, we wouldn't have been pushed back if it weren't for Moss's stupid penalty in the endzone. EVERYONE stepped up on offense today. The defense, not so much. Can we fire DeAngelo Hall NOW?! He wears a big "C" on his jersey for a reason. He's supposed to be a leader, not a four year old immature thug. And why was he just standing there when Gomes and Doughty were struggling to tackle Gronkowski?
Agreed. Although I'm not so sure Moss's penalty was a stupid one. I didn't get to see a replay (thanks, CBS, for your awesome coverage of the game's pivotal moment!), but Moss was adamant after the game that there was nothing in it.
Obviously the player is going to see things from a more one-sided perspective, but until I can see the foul I'm going to give the Redskin the benefit of the doubt — especially on a penalty that is not called very often and is often highly questionable.
Here is the replay
http://www.twitvid.com/73GEZ
Thanks for the clip.
Shanny called the call correct and by definition of the rule, it was a correct call. The question is how many times does a ref make that call. How often have we seen receivers push off and not get called? The problem for Moss is, he extended his arms - at that point, the ref can feel justified in making that call. Moss has to sell it better by not extending his arms.
Does anybody remember seeing a holding call made against the O line of the Pats? I sat in the end zone on the 200 level and saw plenty of blatant holds by the Pat line. The most memorable one was Carriker reaching out with one hand to sack Brady. Why only one hand? Hhis other arm was blatantly being pulled back by the lineman he had beaten. No way the ref misses that because he is looking at Brady as Carriker is desperately trying to grab him - finally Brady scrambles out of reach.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:16 pm
by Red_One43
Shanahan: Redskins “embarrassed” by failing to tackle GronkowskiPosted by Michael David Smith on December 12, 2011, 6:28 PM EST
Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski looked like a man playing against boys on Sunday against the Redskins, catching six passes for 160 yards and two touchdowns and brushing off tackles with ease. Redskins coach Mike Shanahan says no one in the locker room felt good about that.
In particular, Shanahan singled out Redskins cornerback DeAngelo Hall for standing there and watching while two of his teammates failed to bring Gronkowski down. Shanahan said today that Hall felt badly about that.
“I know he was embarrassed by it as was our whole football team,” Shanahan said, via Ryan O’Halloran of CSNWashington.com.
The Redskins should be embarrassed by that showing. On a day when they played a surprisingly competitive game with the Patriots, the secondary’s refusal to compete when Gronkowski had the ball may have been the difference between winning and losing.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ronkowski/
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:08 pm
by welch
Red_One43 wrote:Shanahan: Redskins “embarrassed” by failing to tackle GronkowskiPosted by Michael David Smith on December 12, 2011, 6:28 PM EST
Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski looked like a man playing against boys on Sunday against the Redskins, catching six passes for 160 yards and two touchdowns and brushing off tackles with ease. Redskins coach Mike Shanahan says no one in the locker room felt good about that.
In particular, Shanahan singled out Redskins cornerback DeAngelo Hall for standing there and watching while two of his teammates failed to bring Gronkowski down. Shanahan said today that Hall felt badly about that.
“I know he was embarrassed by it as was our whole football team,” Shanahan said, via Ryan O’Halloran of CSNWashington.com.
The Redskins should be embarrassed by that showing. On a day when they played a surprisingly competitive game with the Patriots, the secondary’s refusal to compete when Gronkowski had the ball may have been the difference between winning and losing.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ronkowski/
This is a pretty serious wack at Hall. "...as was our whole football team". That's rare for a coach.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:22 pm
by The Hogster
CanesSkins26 wrote:It would be one thing if this was a one-time thing for Hall, but it's not. I can't remember what game it was last year, but he had a chance to put a hit on a player about to go into the end zone and didn't do it. This is also the same guy that got owned by Jake Delhomme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE7ZBTvrtIAI don't think that he'll do it, but if I was Shanahan I would strip Hall of his captaincy and bench him for next week. Not only for that lack of effort, but for that idiotic penalty when he three the referee's flag. This guy is a captain and more often than not he acts like a jerk on the field.
It would also be one thing if he was effective, but he's not. He's never been a good cover corner, but in the past he at least made big plays that made up for his shoddy coverage skills, but this year he isn't even doing that.
That play on Delhomme looks worse than it is. That was a well timed bootleg that the whole team bit on. Hall was the only person who actually got over to Delhomme but he didn't have an angle, and did his best to get him down by the collar. Those are hard plays to make. Much harder than they look on TV. Hall probably ran 20 yards just to try and get to Delhomme.
Good play by the Panthers.
The play this week was inexcusable. The tackling of Doughty and Gomes was even worse. Bottom line, I agree with most of you on Hall. He's got to keep his head in the game and give max effort. He had been making strides in tackling, so I wouldn't be so fast to over react on him. He is what he is. A playmaking corner who plays best in off-man zone coverage. He's an average cover corner. But at the end of the day, he's the best corner we have, like it or not.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:58 pm
by Red_One43
^I hear ya on Hall being the best that we have and has improved on his tackling. I get why we didn't want to pay the big bucks to Rogers and passed on solid corners like Joseph and Asomugha, but can we afford, for year three, to pass up on drafting a cover corner or going after one in the FA market? Look at Houston's D going from 30th to 2nd in a one year's transition from 4-3 to 3-4. Cover corner Jonathan Joseph has played a big part in allowing Wade Phillips to do what he likes to do with his D. If year 3 is the year that Shanny plans to make a serious run for the division title, then year three is the year to dump Hall's cover corner salary and go get a real cover corner.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:16 pm
by Red_One43
welch wrote:Red_One43 wrote:Shanahan: Redskins “embarrassed” by failing to tackle GronkowskiPosted by Michael David Smith on December 12, 2011, 6:28 PM EST
Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski looked like a man playing against boys on Sunday against the Redskins, catching six passes for 160 yards and two touchdowns and brushing off tackles with ease. Redskins coach Mike Shanahan says no one in the locker room felt good about that.
In particular, Shanahan singled out Redskins cornerback DeAngelo Hall for standing there and watching while two of his teammates failed to bring Gronkowski down. Shanahan said today that Hall felt badly about that.
“I know he was embarrassed by it as was our whole football team,” Shanahan said, via Ryan O’Halloran of CSNWashington.com.
The Redskins should be embarrassed by that showing. On a day when they played a surprisingly competitive game with the Patriots, the secondary’s refusal to compete when Gronkowski had the ball may have been the difference between winning and losing.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ronkowski/
This is a pretty serious wack at Hall. "...as was our whole football team". That's rare for a coach.
Here's another rare one for a coach:
Did you hear Shanny's presser today? Question was words to the effect, Do you have any say in the decision on how we kick off or do you let Danny have total control. Shanny's answer, words to the effect, Did you see another kick like that. Does that answer your question. His tone was very stern. It sounds like there are going to be some big changes for year three. I think that that is part of the plan.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:24 pm
by SkinsJock
Get rid of EVERYONE - start with a clean slate
OR - just cut the guys that haven't made the sort of effort that the fans here expect
oh wait - there's nobody left - that's OK, there's only 3 games left - NOBODY really cares anymore
give me a break

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:30 pm
by SkinsJock
ref, Mike Shanahan's press conference
ANYBODY that thinks that Mike's words or implications heard at his press conference are even close to the truth is NOT paying attention
there's an old question - "when do you know that Mike's lying about something?" - ONLY when he opens his mouth

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:42 pm
by Redskins_Fanatic
StorminMormon86 wrote:Are you forgetting about Wes Welker or Hernandez?
Not at all. Neither Welker nor Hernandez are anywhere near the weapon that Gronkowski is. The Patriots fans will even admit that. The trick to dealing with Welker is to bump him at the LOS. Hernandez can be covered by a LB most of the time. Gronk just creates too many mismatches.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:48 pm
by Red_One43
SkinsJock wrote:ref, Mike Shanahan's press conference
ANYBODY that thinks that Mike's words or implications heard at his press conference are even close to the truth is NOT paying attention
there's an old question - "when do you know that Mike's lying about something?" - ONLY when he opens his mouth

Of course, Mike is always lying when he talks to the media. He is really happy that Hall walked away from that play and didn't try to make the tackle. That is exactly what he expects from his team captains.
Oh and when he told the media that Rex would start against the Cowboys, he was lying then even though Rex really did start against the Cowboys.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:55 pm
by Red_One43
Shanahan said the penalty would have been disappointing regardless of who committed it, but was especially disappointing because Hall is one of the team captains and is expected to set a good example. The coach said infractions like that test his patience.
“Especially when guys are in a leadership role, we understand that you have to keep your cool, regardless of if you like a call or don’t like a call,” Shanahan said. “That’s your job to handle yourself in a professional manner, and more importantly, not put your team in a hole by having a 15-yard penalty. That’s one of the things that I talked about to our football team. You make too many of those mistakes and you’re not with us.”
You can bet that Shanny is sending a message to Hall. Shanny rarely talks negative about a player in front of the media.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/foo ... #pagebreak
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:02 pm
by Red_One43
“Yeah, if I thought a person wasn’t a leader for one example or another, I wouldn’t revoke it. The players vote on the captain,” Shanahan said. “But I think people would lose confidence in the captain if he kept making bad choices and bad decisions. A captain is a player that you want to lead your football team and play at a very high level. That’s why he’s selected as a captain. Now, saying that, everybody makes mistakes. That’s part of the process. You’ve got to keep your cool, you’ve got to keep your poise. Just because somebody throws a flag doesn’t mean he’s a bad guy. It means you have to keep your poise and you can’t cost your team a 15-yard penalty. You’ve got to put your team first. … That’s the game, putting your team No. 1, you No. 2.”
Does anyone think that Hall is going to get this message? "Team No. 1, you No. 2."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/foo ... #pagebreak