Page 3 of 11

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:39 pm
by TCIYM
If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:43 pm
by SAP_Pete
Time to evaluate Beck.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:45 pm
by Skinsfan55
Still just a two score game.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:47 pm
by TCIYM
Skinsfan55 wrote:Still just a two score game.


:shock:

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:47 pm
by denverbrian
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:49 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Where's that good lookin long ball rexys got?

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:50 pm
by Countertrey
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.


Obviously, a member of the Shanahan clan... you are aware that Shanahan engineered the McNabb deal, right???? He pursued him... he gave away picks for him... then, he shafted him. Brilliant.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:51 pm
by TCIYM
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.


Shanahan didn't win jack. Elway and TD did. We see how successful he was in the playoffs without those two. Grossman blows goats. What is there to evaluate?

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:53 pm
by frankcal20
I really like the future of Armstrong. I don't see him being a game changer but if Kelly can do something, Armstrong could be our Lance Moore.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:55 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
What's the little wire Dmac has in his ear? Listening to the eagle game? Sponge bob?

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:55 pm
by CanesSkins26
Countertrey wrote:
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.


Obviously, a member of the Shanahan clan... you are aware that Shanahan engineered the McNabb deal, right???? He pursued him... he gave away picks for him... then, he shafted him. Brilliant.


The trade was terrible, no doubt about it. But I would rather that they acknowledge that it was a mistake and move forward instead of sticking with McNabb next season just to try and justify the trade.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:55 pm
by Skinsfan55
That's the way to lead a drive Rexy!

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:55 pm
by denverbrian
TCIYM wrote:
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.


Shanahan didn't win jack *sh$t*. Elway and TD did. We see how successful he was in the playoffs without those two. Grossman blows goats. What is there to evaluate?


So the coach has nothing to do with a teams success if they have good players? You must think that if he didn't do jack *sh$t* in Denver. If that's the case then you should not mind him here in DC if he ever got a good player.

The Redskins failures start with their O-line. Denver was fantastic at that position and 'till that gets fixed, Mike can't really do much.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:57 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
HAIL

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:57 pm
by SprintRightOption
Superbowl!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:58 pm
by Irn-Bru
TCIYM, please check your PMs. ;)

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:58 pm
by CanesSkins26
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:
denverbrian wrote:
TCIYM wrote:If I had to play for this idiot I'd want to be fired too.


This idiot won 3 superbowls, 2 as head coach and has been given crap including McNabb. It's obvious that an in division rival didn't think much about trading him to DC.

Got to see how he does next season to really pass judgment on how he will do in DC.


Shanahan didn't win jack *sh$t*. Elway and TD did. We see how successful he was in the playoffs without those two. Grossman blows goats. What is there to evaluate?


So the coach has nothing to do with a teams success if they have good players? You must think that if he didn't do jack *sh$t* in Denver. If that's the case then you should not mind him here in DC if he ever got a good player.

The Redskins failures start with their O-line. Denver was fantastic at that position and 'till that gets fixed, Mike can't really do much.


Since he is in charge of player personnel decisions it's Mike's job to fix the oline. And with the oline still a problem he should not have spent 2 picks on a 34-year old qb.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:58 pm
by denverbrian
Nice call on the screen pass MIKE!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:59 pm
by Skinsfan55
Yeah, not to mention that Shanahan won in Denver with Elway (inherited, but always a bridesmaid in Denver), TD (6th round pick), Eddie McCaffrey (trade, was an average role player before Denver) and Rod Smith (undrafted FA). Not to mention the other guys Shanny brought in. Winning back to back Super Bowls was a huge accomplishment and was done with Shanahan's handiwork.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:59 pm
by denverbrian
CanesSkins26 wrote:
Since he is in charge of player personnel decisions it's Mike's job to fix the oline. And with the oline still a problem he should not have spent 2 picks on a 34-year old qb.


Agree 100%. His drafting track record the last few years in Denver was not good either.

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:59 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Let's go SKINS

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:00 pm
by CanesSkins26
CRAZY stat...

Russellmania09

That is the #Redskins first OFFENSIVE TD against the #Cowboys since 2008. No TD's at all last year, TD in win was from @DHall23

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:04 pm
by redskins14ru
who was coverin on that play

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:05 pm
by CanesSkins26
our D is a joke

Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:06 pm
by denverbrian
redskins14ru wrote:who was coverin on that play


Coverage wasn't bad, a great throw.