Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:46 am
The leather jacket sealed his fate. 
The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.
He's doing his best Fonzi impression.
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Jay Cutler
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:08 am
He's doing his best Fonzi impression.
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 3:06 pm
The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.
Humph...I thought it was the fact that he apparently shares a plastic surgeon with Nancy Pelosi...
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:09 pm
Countertrey wrote:The Hogster wrote:The leather jacket sealed his fate.
Humph...I thought it was the fact that he apparently shares a plastic surgeon with Nancy Pelosi...
If I was Jerry I'd get a refund - the face lift made them look even worse than before - altho with Pelosi, who can look without gagging
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:50 pm
Wow, thanks Bears! I don't think he's worth that even if he didn't have a bad attitude. With a good attitude he'd be a good quarterback, not a great one. But I disagree the Bears offer was better because the two #1's were from us. Don't get me wrong, I'm optimistic, I always am. But going by history of us under Snyder...
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:52 pm
DarthMonk wrote:
SCHWEET! Rhymes with tweet!
DarthMonk
My favorite part was having the link....
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:55 pm
DarthMonk wrote:A clear reversal just occured. Hogster did not mock giving up a lot for Cutler. He mocked those who said giving up that much for Cutler was wise while those same people said we gave up too much for McNabb. I can see why it happened though. Hogter mocks sarcastically which can be mistaken for seriousness in his own position. But right before the sarcasm he calls Cutler a douche and right after he writes. Pretty clear.
Darthmonk
The incredible order of magnitude difference between two #1's and two #3's for one #2 and one #3 or #4 makes any comparison between those situations just silly to begin with whatever point he was making
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:04 pm
The Hogster wrote:Thanks Kazoo. May this thread serve as a monument to How Not To Use The Internet & Make a Jack Of Yourself.
I'm still in disbelief they took the Bears offer over ours considering the record of success of the Danster. Thank you Bears for bailing him out of that stupid offer.
BTW, did you hear about the terrorists who hijacked the plane of lawyers? They threatened to release one every hour until their demands were met.
But actually lawyers do serve one purpose. If it weren't for lawyers the only sleazy, crap eating, filth infested vermin we'd have would be rats, and that would be a tragedy...
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:28 am
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Wow, thanks Bears! I don't think he's worth that even if he didn't have a bad attitude. With a good attitude he'd be a good quarterback, not a great one. But I disagree the Bears offer was better because the two #1's were from us. Don't get me wrong, I'm optimistic, I always am. But going by history of us under Snyder...
Yeah, but it was all that and JC too, and Orton from Da Bears. And they still took Da Bears offer.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:39 pm
Kazzoo wrote:
I'm still in disbelief they took the Bears offer over ours considering the record of success of the Danster.
It's really not rocket science. They needed a starting caliber Quarterback to replace the starting caliber Quarterback that they traded away.
BTW, did you hear about the terrorists who hijacked the plane of lawyers? They threatened to release one every hour until their demands were met.
Actually, I did hear that one. I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.
As you say "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance" there's always a lawyer joke. 
But actually lawyers do serve one purpose. If it weren't for lawyers the only sleazy, crap eating, filth infested vermin we'd have would be rats, and that would be a tragedy..
Stay classy Kazoo.
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 2:28 pm
The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.
The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:04 pm
It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.KazooSkinsFan wrote:The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.
The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:00 pm
It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.
I apologize for my comments which violated the rules. Dealing with this particular poster has been known to cause several adverse side effects. I will avoid further contact.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:59 am
1niksder wrote:It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.KazooSkinsFan wrote:The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.
The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
BUMPED Per Kazoo's request.
Enjoy your fail Kazoo.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:45 pm
Seriously????
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:25 pm
The Hogster wrote:1niksder wrote:It's pretty obvious in this case... They DID offer what was said they offered... Two 2s and two 3s ARE more than a two and a 3 or 4... The most obvious of it all is TWO LONGTIME BOARD MEMBERS continue to ATTACK THE POSTER instead of the post.KazooSkinsFan wrote:The Hogster wrote:I heard you say it in another thread in which I embarrassed you in a similar manner as was done in this one.
The need to continually state one's prowess is not driven by personal security. The need to feel it needs to be repeatedly stated shows that even to the claimer it's not obvious...
BUMPED Per Kazoo's request.
Enjoy your fail Kazoo.
Set up...like a bowling pin...knocked down...gets to wearing thin...
The fail is you, my man. Here is the statement you made.
The Hogster wrote:In 2008, the Redskins under the direction of Vinny Cerrato OFFERED 2 FIRST ROUND Picks AND TWO THIRD ROUND PICKS for Jay Cutler
I said BS to this. You never supported the two third round picks at all. You also never supported there was an "offer" of two first round picks, only reports in the media we were "willing" to part with two first round picks.
You declared victory. That you declared victory is the only part of the story you remember right. When you can prove your claim, let me know. You haven't so far.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:42 pm
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:06 pm
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Set up...like a bowling pin...knocked down...gets to wearing thin...
Whoa, whoa, whoa there Kazoo. A Dead reference? You just blew my mind.
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:30 pm
The quotes not in that link. I find sheftner annoying as snot, but that doesn't make him wrong. So OK, Cerrato is that dumb. I'm glad that trade didn't happen.
And thanks for the compliment. Not only do you equate my just saying "Cerrato isn't that stupid" with disagreements of knowledge with other posters, but you listed me above them. When all you got me on is Cerrato IS that stupid.
Wow, I'm #1 with a bullet. I only enjoy that because I bother you so much.