Page 3 of 6
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:56 pm
by Californiaskin
wow........last year we lost to the rams......you guys are so negative
I agree we need to put up more points and that the red zone o lacks creativity but we won.......JC played well.....Team just needs to get better at putting up points and well be ok
Id hate to see this discussion if wed lost!
U guys r way to brutal!
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:01 pm
by Skinsfan55
How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:01 pm
by Californiaskin
Randy Thomas out for the season
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:15 pm
by Deadskins
SkinsFreak wrote:SCSkinsFan wrote:At least Z is taking responsibility and the blame for not scoring in the Red Zone on the postgame.
Good, because it's on him.
Now, I don't expect every short coming to be fixed in one week, but save for the horrible red zone play calling, the offense did look a lot better this week moving the ball. That's at least somewhat encouraging.
Against the
Rams.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:23 pm
by brad7686
Skinsfan55 wrote:I said in the offseason that if Mark Sanchez turned out to be a franchise QB then it wouldn't even matter what a team gave up to get him, the value of a franchise QB is so great that you would trade your whole draft and best player for one...
The Jets traded 3 spare parts and a second round pick for Mark Sanchez... it's early yet but he's 2-0 and just took down the mighty Patriots.
Personally, the Redskins are such a mess I wouldn't be upset at all if the Redskins traded
ey (a great player, but you don't build a team around a TE), Moss, Portis, Landry, McIntosh, or anyone who might bring back draft picks.
Sanchez threw for like 160 yards. The Jets won because they kept the pats off the board, not because of Sanchez.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:32 pm
by crazyhorse1
Chris Luva Luva wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:I disagree there slightly regarding the intermediate passes. No QB throws a perfect pass every time. But JC hits a lot of those and hits them in stride. If you re-watch the game, I think you'll see that. Save for the pathetic red zone play calling, JC moved the ball up and down the field all day long, and there was an emphasis placed on the intermediate passing game today. But I completely agree with you on the deep passes... no accuracy whatsoever.
I am prolly being a bit hard on him on the intermediate passes.
Campbell is a fine intermediate passer so we should use him as such. Imtermediate passers have won superbowls. The only thing wrong right now with Campbell as a QB is that he has a moronic idiot calling plays for him in the red zone. Good play calling could have beaten the Giants, even, if you think about it. There are now only two elements keeping us from being among the best:
We can not run the ball unless special conditions prevail. which they never do in the red zone. We can not run in the red zone and should immediately stop trying to, not even with a yard to go. We do not have the line for it.
Our Coach is a idiot, especially in the red zone.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:42 pm
by SnyderSucks
Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Campbell didn't drop an on the money TD pass. Campbell didn't fumble away on another drive. Campbell wasn't calling those terrible plays. The play wasn't "great", but the list of problems today didn't include him.
After two games, I think they should look at running the shotgun as their primary formation. Campbell is much better at it, and good teams play to their players strengths.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:43 pm
by crazyhorse1
Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
You're over the top and off track. Campbell did play great today-- the Rams never stopped him. That we left for Zorn to do, and he did it with his red zone playcalling. Are the you blaming Campbell for Zorn, or for Sellers, who flat out dropped a perfect TD pass.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:46 pm
by MDSKINSFAN
I was pleased with all the players except D-Hall today. He continues to shy away from contact and was getting beat by average receivers. The cushions given to average receivers on defense was really frustrating just like it has been for the last year.
Orakpo was a force when put at DE. Thats where he should be the entire game.
JC,
ey, and ARE all looked good. The only thing that held this offense back was the pathetic playcalling especially in the red zone. Someone needs to wake up Zorn and let him know he doesn't know how to call a game. His terrible playcalling hasn't gotten better since last year. He looks lost on the sideline. He is in way over his head.
I'm glad we won but we looked like crap. Make that our offense looked like crap in the red zone.
8 quarters with 1 offensive TD is just pathetic. Zorn should be embarrassed. That has to be the worst in the league.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:54 pm
by Deadskins
SnyderSucks wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Campbell didn't drop an on the money TD pass. Campbell didn't fumble away on another drive. Campbell wasn't calling those terrible plays. The play wasn't "great", but the list of problems today didn't include him.
After two games, I think they should look at running the shotgun as their primary formation. Campbell is much better at it, and good teams play to their players strengths.
I think we would be better served running a no-huddle offense than running shotgun full-time. Zorn's play calling might even get a boost because teams wouldn't have a chance to anticipate what he is going to do. Campbell seems to play better when he has some urgency as well.
Re: well
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:54 pm
by RayNAustin
cleg wrote:Well, having some time to reflect (drink more) I have come to the realization that winning, no matter how ugly, feels better than losing. So, yeah (I guess). What I did learn today though was that 1) Zorn, not JC is the problem and 2) to walk around Philly in my LL30 jersey would be more fun if we had scored TD.
Doctor Ray says, drink some more, and reflect some more. Zorn was no where around in 2007.
Pay no attention to the prolific offensive production between the 20's. Most of them are 5 yard passes with a lot of YAC. Inside the 30, Campbell is a deer in headlights, and Zorn .... ole Zorny is trying to pull rabbits out of hats.
Take the freaking sunglasses off ... bench Campbell, and stop running the offense like you're playing a pick up game with 40 year old hippies
Then ... maybe this team can stop embarrassing themselves, the city, and the fans across the nation.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:55 pm
by markshark84
SkinsFreak wrote:markshark84 wrote:Zorn's playcalling in the red zone is what killed this offense.
Completely agree.
markshark84 wrote: We didn't have a play bigger than 25 yards. The dinking and dunking needs to go. Not sure if this is a result of the play calling or JC, but it needs to end.
I thought you had all this experience and were some sort of expert? This post clearly shows a complete lack of knowledge about the offensive system. First of all, it's not dinking and dunking... that's what MB04 did years ago with passes behind the line of scrimmage and others that didn't go beyond 4 yards. The WCO encompasses an
intermediate passing game that relies on receivers making yards after the catch, much like ARE did last week with his 7 catches for 98 yards. How many passes did JC throw short of 5 yards? Few... if any. They did in fact take some shots downfield, it's just that JC struggles with accuracy on the long passes.
No, I have more experience than you. And I guess you are still stuck on that. And do you really think that I don't understand the WCO? The fact is that the skins "WCO offense" --- is NOT a pure WCO, so maybe you should understand that......the skins had 3 passes for over 20 yards today --- only ONE of which had YAC attached to it --- one by Betts. It was atrocious. And yes, JC did have issues with his accuracy on longer throws. But hey, if you are happy with this "WCO Offense" be my guest --- it sounds like you are. I am not, I am not happy with the dinking and dunking going on with this offense and their point production. Call it what you want, but I take it for what it is.
I understand that you are going to take any shot you can at me from now on because I called you out, but you have to NOT put words in my mouth in an attempt to do so --- which you did in this post. This offense is not a pure WCO offense like the ones seen in SF under Walsh.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:59 pm
by PulpExposure
markshark84 wrote:No, I have more experience than you.
Please explain?
Re: well
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:59 pm
by Deadskins
RayNAustin wrote:stop running the offense like you're playing a pick up game with 40 year old hippies
Lay off the 40-year old hippies, Ray.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:00 pm
by markshark84
Skinsfan55 wrote:I said in the offseason that if Mark Sanchez turned out to be a franchise QB then it wouldn't even matter what a team gave up to get him, the value of a franchise QB is so great that you would trade your whole draft and best player for one...
The Jets traded 3 spare parts and a second round pick for Mark Sanchez... it's early yet but he's 2-0 and just took down the mighty Patriots.
Personally, the Redskins are such a mess I wouldn't be upset at all if the Redskins traded
ey (a great player, but you don't build a team around a TE), Moss, Portis, Landry, McIntosh, or anyone who might bring back draft picks.
One caveat -- Dan Snyder and Vinny would be the ones making those picks.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:01 pm
by markshark84
PulpExposure wrote:markshark84 wrote:No, I have more experience than you.
Please explain?
Was said during the game thread. Stupid thing to say by me, but I was mad and in a horrible mood about the game and his post.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:20 pm
by grampi
SnyderSucks wrote:grampi wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:Why didn't we see this coming? The Redskins tried like hell to get a QB this offseason and I brushed it off as media speculation, the season before last they hired Jim Zorn as the OC with no head coach in place. Due to fan pressure they promoted Zorn to HC and waved bye bye to Jim Fassel (a fine coach)...
Obviously, the two most important factors for a football team, HC and QB were in serious disarray this season and I remained optimistic. I feel like a dope.
The Redskins are awful right now, and their youngest, best player is probably Orakpo without a whole lot of competition. The line is old, and most of the core (Cooley, Portis, Moss, and others) are seeing their primes flash before their eyes with no hope of a competitive season in the near future. This team needs a new QB, a younger RB, smarter, quicker wideouts, a younger offensive and defensive line, better linebackers, and a tougher secondary. Seriously, can even the biggest Redskins homer see anything to look forward to in the future? The Skins have been mismanaged since 1992... they've been on 5 or 6 different 5 year plans since the last time they won the Superbowl and they have been practically incompetent in free agency and the draft for at least that long.
In 1999/2000 the Redskins had their best chance at winning, Champ Bailey, Jon Jansen, Chris Samuels, Stephen Davis, Albert Connell, Stephen Alexander, Mike Sellers, Sam Shade, LaVar Arrington, Derek Smith, Dan Wilkinson... you don't get a young core like that very often. All those guys were good to star level and 27 or under. We were led by a star QB in Brad Johnson who made the probowl and we went to the playoffs in 1999.
In 2000, what did we do?
Dan Snyder came in and meddled. He screwed with a star like Johnson (someone who won a Superbowl later and had at least 3 more high quality years left) and brought in a malcontent like Jeff George. An older QB who was out of the league within two years. Snyder added pieces without the approval of the coach (like George, Larry Centers, etc.) and then fired him when things didn't work out. He fired Schottenheimer one year into his three year plan, Spurrier was a spectacular failure and Joe Gibbs ran for cover 4 years into a 5 year contract because he saw the futility in trying to win with the Redskins. (Incidentally, Gibbs had groomed Gregg Williams as his successor but he was fired almost immediately after Joe Gibbs left.)
I mean, what a horrible mess the franchise is in right now, and I don't see it getting any better. It would just be a miracle for a young coach to take control next season and draft a QB high (I like Colt McCoy) so we can hope for some Flacco or Ryan like success... but that's all we have... hope. There's no evidence the Redskins will do any of that.
Instead the evidence suggests that Snyder will gas up Redskins One and meet with Cowher or Shannahan offering millions and millions for another spectacular failure.
Didn't I recently hear some rumors floating around that John Kent Cooke may try to buy this team back? That could be the best thing that could happen to this team since it left the Cooke family. Danny Boy is the worst owner in the NFL.
John Kent Cooke? How is he an improvement over Snyder? His father was a great owner, but he was terrible.
How do you know? John didn't own the team long enough to find out. The team was sold almost immediately after Jack died. Besides, NO ONE could be as bad as Danny Boy.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:23 pm
by grampi
SnyderSucks wrote:grampi wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:Why didn't we see this coming? The Redskins tried like hell to get a QB this offseason and I brushed it off as media speculation, the season before last they hired Jim Zorn as the OC with no head coach in place. Due to fan pressure they promoted Zorn to HC and waved bye bye to Jim Fassel (a fine coach)...
Obviously, the two most important factors for a football team, HC and QB were in serious disarray this season and I remained optimistic. I feel like a dope.
The Redskins are awful right now, and their youngest, best player is probably Orakpo without a whole lot of competition. The line is old, and most of the core (Cooley, Portis, Moss, and others) are seeing their primes flash before their eyes with no hope of a competitive season in the near future. This team needs a new QB, a younger RB, smarter, quicker wideouts, a younger offensive and defensive line, better linebackers, and a tougher secondary. Seriously, can even the biggest Redskins homer see anything to look forward to in the future? The Skins have been mismanaged since 1992... they've been on 5 or 6 different 5 year plans since the last time they won the Superbowl and they have been practically incompetent in free agency and the draft for at least that long.
In 1999/2000 the Redskins had their best chance at winning, Champ Bailey, Jon Jansen, Chris Samuels, Stephen Davis, Albert Connell, Stephen Alexander, Mike Sellers, Sam Shade, LaVar Arrington, Derek Smith, Dan Wilkinson... you don't get a young core like that very often. All those guys were good to star level and 27 or under. We were led by a star QB in Brad Johnson who made the probowl and we went to the playoffs in 1999.
In 2000, what did we do?
Dan Snyder came in and meddled. He screwed with a star like Johnson (someone who won a Superbowl later and had at least 3 more high quality years left) and brought in a malcontent like Jeff George. An older QB who was out of the league within two years. Snyder added pieces without the approval of the coach (like George, Larry Centers, etc.) and then fired him when things didn't work out. He fired Schottenheimer one year into his three year plan, Spurrier was a spectacular failure and Joe Gibbs ran for cover 4 years into a 5 year contract because he saw the futility in trying to win with the Redskins. (Incidentally, Gibbs had groomed Gregg Williams as his successor but he was fired almost immediately after Joe Gibbs left.)
I mean, what a horrible mess the franchise is in right now, and I don't see it getting any better. It would just be a miracle for a young coach to take control next season and draft a QB high (I like Colt McCoy) so we can hope for some Flacco or Ryan like success... but that's all we have... hope. There's no evidence the Redskins will do any of that.
Instead the evidence suggests that Snyder will gas up Redskins One and meet with Cowher or Shannahan offering millions and millions for another spectacular failure.
Didn't I recently hear some rumors floating around that John Kent Cooke may try to buy this team back? That could be the best thing that could happen to this team since it left the Cooke family. Danny Boy is the worst owner in the NFL.
John Kent Cooke? How is he an improvement over Snyder? His father was a great owner, but he was terrible.
How do you know? John didn't own the team long enough to find out. The team was sold almost immediately after Jack died. Besides, NO ONE could be as bad as Danny Boy.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:35 pm
by SnyderSucks
Deadskins wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Campbell didn't drop an on the money TD pass. Campbell didn't fumble away on another drive. Campbell wasn't calling those terrible plays. The play wasn't "great", but the list of problems today didn't include him.
After two games, I think they should look at running the shotgun as their primary formation. Campbell is much better at it, and good teams play to their players strengths.
I think we would be better served running a no-huddle offense than running shotgun full-time. Zorn's play calling might even get a boost because teams wouldn't have a chance to anticipate what he is going to do. Campbell seems to play better when he has some urgency as well.
My only fear with the no huddle is wearing out our defense. If the no-huddle doesn't score, it gives the other team a lot of possessions.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:40 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
SnyderSucks wrote:Deadskins wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Campbell didn't drop an on the money TD pass. Campbell didn't fumble away on another drive. Campbell wasn't calling those terrible plays. The play wasn't "great", but the list of problems today didn't include him.
After two games, I think they should look at running the shotgun as their primary formation. Campbell is much better at it, and good teams play to their players strengths.
I think we would be better served running a no-huddle offense than running shotgun full-time. Zorn's play calling might even get a boost because teams wouldn't have a chance to anticipate what he is going to do. Campbell seems to play better when he has some urgency as well.
My only fear with the no huddle is wearing out our defense. If the no-huddle doesn't score, it gives the other team a lot of possessions.
LMAO like we weren't going 3 and out quickly anyway...
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:45 pm
by SnyderSucks
grampi wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:grampi wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:Why didn't we see this coming? The Redskins tried like hell to get a QB this offseason and I brushed it off as media speculation, the season before last they hired Jim Zorn as the OC with no head coach in place. Due to fan pressure they promoted Zorn to HC and waved bye bye to Jim Fassel (a fine coach)...
Obviously, the two most important factors for a football team, HC and QB were in serious disarray this season and I remained optimistic. I feel like a dope.
The Redskins are awful right now, and their youngest, best player is probably Orakpo without a whole lot of competition. The line is old, and most of the core (Cooley, Portis, Moss, and others) are seeing their primes flash before their eyes with no hope of a competitive season in the near future. This team needs a new QB, a younger RB, smarter, quicker wideouts, a younger offensive and defensive line, better linebackers, and a tougher secondary. Seriously, can even the biggest Redskins homer see anything to look forward to in the future? The Skins have been mismanaged since 1992... they've been on 5 or 6 different 5 year plans since the last time they won the Superbowl and they have been practically incompetent in free agency and the draft for at least that long.
In 1999/2000 the Redskins had their best chance at winning, Champ Bailey, Jon Jansen, Chris Samuels, Stephen Davis, Albert Connell, Stephen Alexander, Mike Sellers, Sam Shade, LaVar Arrington, Derek Smith, Dan Wilkinson... you don't get a young core like that very often. All those guys were good to star level and 27 or under. We were led by a star QB in Brad Johnson who made the probowl and we went to the playoffs in 1999.
In 2000, what did we do?
Dan Snyder came in and meddled. He screwed with a star like Johnson (someone who won a Superbowl later and had at least 3 more high quality years left) and brought in a malcontent like Jeff George. An older QB who was out of the league within two years. Snyder added pieces without the approval of the coach (like George, Larry Centers, etc.) and then fired him when things didn't work out. He fired Schottenheimer one year into his three year plan, Spurrier was a spectacular failure and Joe Gibbs ran for cover 4 years into a 5 year contract because he saw the futility in trying to win with the Redskins. (Incidentally, Gibbs had groomed Gregg Williams as his successor but he was fired almost immediately after Joe Gibbs left.)
I mean, what a horrible mess the franchise is in right now, and I don't see it getting any better. It would just be a miracle for a young coach to take control next season and draft a QB high (I like Colt McCoy) so we can hope for some Flacco or Ryan like success... but that's all we have... hope. There's no evidence the Redskins will do any of that.
Instead the evidence suggests that Snyder will gas up Redskins One and meet with Cowher or Shannahan offering millions and millions for another spectacular failure.
Didn't I recently hear some rumors floating around that John Kent Cooke may try to buy this team back? That could be the best thing that could happen to this team since it left the Cooke family. Danny Boy is the worst owner in the NFL.
John Kent Cooke? How is he an improvement over Snyder? His father was a great owner, but he was terrible.
How do you know? John didn't own the team long enough to find out. The team was sold almost immediately after Jack died. Besides, NO ONE could be as bad as Danny Boy.
He was in charge prior to his fathers death, then two more after. He had several years to fire Turner and never did. That in itself is enough to show he wasn't a good owner.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:51 pm
by Irn-Bru
As for worse owners than Dan Snyder. . .talk about hyperbole. I guess the cities of Oakland, Detroit, and Dallas must not exist. Not to mention a truck-load of owners from the past.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:57 pm
by SnyderSucks
Chris Luva Luva wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Deadskins wrote:SnyderSucks wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
Campbell didn't drop an on the money TD pass. Campbell didn't fumble away on another drive. Campbell wasn't calling those terrible plays. The play wasn't "great", but the list of problems today didn't include him.
After two games, I think they should look at running the shotgun as their primary formation. Campbell is much better at it, and good teams play to their players strengths.
I think we would be better served running a no-huddle offense than running shotgun full-time. Zorn's play calling might even get a boost because teams wouldn't have a chance to anticipate what he is going to do. Campbell seems to play better when he has some urgency as well.
My only fear with the no huddle is wearing out our defense. If the no-huddle doesn't score, it gives the other team a lot of possessions.
LMAO like we weren't going 3 and out quickly anyway...
Twice today. Zorns playcalling leads to too many third downs. He's calling plays to get to a manageable third down instead of calling plays to get a first before third down.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:08 pm
by RayNAustin
crazyhorse1 wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:How could you possibly say he played "great"? We did not even score a touchdown!!
Jason Campbell played well enough to score 9 points... against a team that's picked second overall for the last two years. The Redskins offense was pathetic today... but fortunately (or unfortunately depending on who you want next April) for us the Rams offense was worse.
You're over the top and off track. Campbell did play great today-- the Rams never stopped him. That we left for Zorn to do, and he did it with his red zone playcalling. Are the you blaming Campbell for Zorn, or for Sellers, who flat out dropped a perfect TD pass.
Campbell played "great" today?
Look, Campbell threw a bunch of 5-7 yard passes against a pretty poor team, and they moved the ball at will between the 20's. That pads the stats once again, but the results are the same as the pathetic second half of last year. 9 points.
Yes Sellers dropped a TD ... but Campbell overthrew Kelly on the first play with no one between him and the end zone. 7 points missed right out of the blocks, and the result was a 3 and out instead of 7 Zip.
There's blame all around on this pathetic offense. Moss's fumble, Sellers drop, and Jason's inability to complete passes down field. All of it combines to produce this type of outcome. But let's be realistic here. No team can fail to score a TD or go 0 for 5 in the Red Zone against a team like the Rams and say the QB played great. Let's get that straight.
IF you really want to know what is wrong with the Redskins offense, just listen to Zorn and Campbell's post game.
Zorn, who should be embarrassed was in fact rather giddy and pleased with the win, and thought they did a lot of good things today. This clown should be run out of town. His offense sucks. His play calling is inconceivable to the human mind, and his lackadaisical Napa Valley attitude is showing up in an offense that seems to have no clue, and worse ... no hope.
Campbell's presser is vintage Campbell ... saying that 2 TDs were dropped and that hurt. He never mentioned the plays HE missed or the TD HE MISSED on the opening drive. Of course, he has never taken responsibility for the lack of production on offense, so that's no surprise.
This game, and the post game interview with Zorn portends bad things.
Zorn should be disgusted with himself and this pathetic excuse for a Professional Football offense, but he isn't. So I don't know what it would take to disgust him.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:21 pm
by CanesSkins26
Campbell's presser is vintage Campbell ... saying that 2 TDs were dropped and that hurt. He never mentioned the plays HE missed or the TD HE MISSED on the opening drive. Of course, he has never taken responsibility for the lack of production on offense, so that's no surprise.
QFT. Campbell has NEVER as a Redskin taken responsibility for his struggles.